Since the bots list breaks at 625px with left col of settings
hidden and at 850px with left col of settings visible
without this media query,
having this media query trigger at 991px shouldn't produce
any problems.
This media query aligns filter buttons on tablets. Since tablets
range are usually less than 991px in width, this breakpoint makes
more sense. Also, the filter buttons looks nice between 1033px
and 991px.
Instead of adjusting the width of settings container at
1130px, we adjust it at 991px which is the standard for smaller
screens. Adjusting it 1200px(xl) didn't make sense, so the
next reasonable breakpoint was used.
Since alert-box has size of 900px on large devices, we had to
reduce its size for devices less than 900px. Setting this
breakpoint to 991px, shouldn't break anything.
The changes were not live tested since search pill is not enabled.
However, this should look fine since the properties changed
were not depended upon 500px.
We use 767px for hiding left column.
The components changed here were tested to be working fine.
This change is not likely to introduce any regression as the
calculations in the components here were not dependent upon the
breakpoint being at 775px.
We use 1199px for hiding right column.
The components changed here were tested to be working fine.
This change is not likely to introduce any regression as the
calculations in the components here were not dependent upon the
breakpoint being at 1165px.
This code was intended to hide the stream description on stream
settings overlay on display <350px; but, the css selector for
should be `.stream-row` instead of `.stream_row`. Anyway, the
overlay looks fine on small devices with stream description.
Hence, we just remove this dead code.
'>' and 'e' are added as hotkey hints for 'Quote and
reply or forward' and 'View source / Edit topic' options
in actions popover, to help make these hotkeys more discoverable.
This commit updates the Zulip User-Agent to
'Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ZulipURLPreview/{version}; +{external_host})'
as the older User-Agent was rendering Markdown YouTube titles as
'YouTube - YouTube'.
Fixes#16970.
c2526844e9 removed the `signups` queue
worker, and the command-line tool that enqueues to it -- but not the
automated process that enqueues during signups itself.
Remove the signup, since it is no longer in use.
Previously, the data type of parameters wasn't displayed in the API
Documentation, even though that OpenAPI data is carefully validated
against the implementation. Here we add a recursive function to
render the data types visibly in the API documentation.
This only covers the request parameters; we'll want to do something
similar for response parameters in a follow-up PR.
Fixes part of #15967.
While adding custom emojis, when a user clicks on the submit
button without providing a name to the emoji, the submit button
becomes unresponsive. This commit fixes that.
Fixes#16921
When we were getting an apply_event call for
a subscription/add event, we were trying not to
mutate the event itself, but this clumsy code
was still mutating the actual event:
# Avoid letting 'subscribers' entries end up in the list
for i, sub in enumerate(event['subscriptions']):
event['subscriptions'][i] = \
copy.deepcopy(event['subscriptions'][i])
del event['subscriptions'][i]['subscribers']
This is only a theoretical bug.
The only person who receives a subscription/add
event is the current user.
And it wouldn't have affected the current user,
since the apply_event was correctly updating the
state, and we wouldn't actually deliver the event
to the client (because the whole point of apply_event
is to prevent us from having to piggyback the
super-recent events on to our payload or put
them into the event queue and possibly race).
The new code just cleanly makes a copy of each
sub, if necessary, as we add them to state["subscriptions"].
And I updated the event schemas to reflect that
subscribers is always present in subscription/add
event.
Long term we should probably avoid sending subscribers
on this event when the clients don't set something
like include_subscribers. That's a fairly complicated
fix that involves passing in flags to ClientDescriptor.
Alternatively, we could just say that our policy is
that we never send subscribers there, but we instead
use peer_add events. See issue #17089 for more
details.
It's always cleaner to work in id space. It probably
would have required a perfect storm to have broken
the existing code, but using ids is obviously more
robust in theory, and just as simple.
We now require keywords, so that there is no
pitfall for mixing up boolean parameters.
Positional parameters are basically evil
when you have a bunch of bools.
I also make user_profile the first argument.
Finally, the code is more diff-friendly.
I eliminate the defaults, since the existing code
was already specificying values for most things.
I move all the booleans to the bottom for both
parameters and arguments.
I require explicit keywords for everything but
user_profile (which is now first).
And, finally, I format the code in a more
diff-friendly manner.
We eliminate some redundant checks.
We also consistently provide a `subscribers` field
in our stream data with `[]`, even if our users
can't access subscribers. We therefore bump
the API version and tweak the docs. (See further
down for a detailed justification of the change.)
Even though it is sometimes fine to have redundant code
that is defensive in nature, some upcoming changes are gonna
move subscriber-related logic out of build_stream_dict_for_sub
for certain codepaths as part of our effort to streamline
the payload for subscribers within page_params.
So we can't rely on the code that I removed here
inside of build_stream_dict_for_sub.
Anyway, it makes more sense to do these checks explicitly
in the validate function.
The code in build_stream_dict_for_sub was almost effectively
a noop, since the validation function was already preventing
us from getting subscriber info. The only difference it
made was sometimes converting `[]` to `None`, and then
subsequently omitting the subscribers field.
Neither ZT nor the webapp make any distinction between
`[]` or <missing key> for the `subscribers` data in
`page_params`.
The webapp has had this code for a long time (and now
equivalent code elsewhere in this PR):
if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(sub, "subscribers")) {
sub.subscribers = new LazySet([]);
}
The webapp calculates access based on booleans, anyway:
sub.can_access_subscribers =
page_params.is_admin || sub.subscribed ||
(!page_params.is_guest && !sub.invite_only);
And ZT would choke if `subscribers` were missing, except that
it never gets to the relevant code due to other checks:
def get_other_subscribers_in_stream(<snip>):
assert stream_id is not None or stream_name is not None
if stream_id:
assert self.is_user_subscribed_to_stream(stream_id)
return [sub
for sub in self.stream_dict[stream_id]['subscribers']
if sub != self.user_id]
else:
return [sub
for _, stream in self.stream_dict.items()
for sub in stream['subscribers']
if stream['name'] == stream_name
if sub != self.user_id]
You could make a semantic argument that we should prefer
<missing key> to `[]` when subscribers aren't even available, but
we have precedent from the way that `bulk_get_subscriber_user_ids`
has traditionally populated its result:
result: Dict[int, List[int]] =
{stream["id"]: [] for stream in stream_dicts}
If we changed `stream_dicts` to `target_stream_dicts` we
would faciliate a move toward `None`, but it would just cause
headaches for other server code as well as the frontends
(which, to reiterate, already prefer the empty array
for convenience).
As my comment indicates, I would prefer to handle
this explicitly by raising JsonableError in an
else statement here, but it's not a big deal.
This function can probably be simplified with a
bit of work, mostly on the testing side to make
sure we are covering all edge cases, but that
is out of the scope of my current PR.
Aman Agrawal
Akshat
akshatdalton
Alex Vandiver
Ganesh Pawar
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Steve Howell
Nikhil Maske