A missed message email notification, where the message is the welcome
message sent by the welcome bot on account creation, get sent when
the user somehow not focuses the browser tab during account creation.
No missed message email or push notifications should be sent for the
messages generated by the welcome bot.
'internal_send_private_message' accepts a parameter
'disable_external_notifications' and is set to 'True' when the sender
is 'welcome bot'.
A check is introduced in `trivially_should_not_notify`, not to notify
if `disable_external_notifications` is true.
TestCases are updated to include the `disable_external_notifications`
check in the early (False) return patterns of `is_push_notifiable` and
`is_email_notifiable`.
One query reduced for both `test_create_user_with_multiple_streams`
and `test_register`.
Reason: When welcome bot sends message after user creation
`do_send_messages` calls `get_active_presence_idle_user_ids`,
`user_ids` in `get_active_presence_idle_user_ids` remains empty if
`disable_external_notifications` is true because `is_notifiable` returns
false.
`get_active_presence_idle_user_ids` calls `filter_presence_idle_user_ids`
and since the `user_ids` is empty, the query inside the function doesn't
get executed.
MissedMessageHookTest updated.
Fixes: #22884
Doing rapid pace mark-as-unread in the Zulip web application, one
observed assertion failures showing that the server would send an
event containing multiple message IDs but only one of the messages
present in the message_details side data structure.
The cause of this was the "virtual events" compression system; two
flags/remove/read events were being combined by simply concatenating
the lists of events, without any attempt to merge the
`message_details` field on those objects.
The immediate fix is to disable virtual events compression for this
event class, but it's not unlikely we'll need to just eliminate the
virtual_events system entirely, because it seems difficult to make it
soundly handle a message whose state for a given flag changes back and
forth while the client is offline.
But we'll leave that for later, since removing that optimization
deserves more discussion than fixing this event corruption bug.
return inside finally blocks causes exceptions to be silenced.
Although these blocks follow blanket ‘except Exception’ handlers, they
do not seem to have a goal of silencing BaseException and exceptions
thrown by the exception handler, so rewrite them to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Mobile clients older than v27.192 do not support PRONOUNS type
custom profile fields, so we instead change the type of it to
SHORT_TEXT in the data sent with register response and also in
the events sent to those clients.
We now send a new user_topic event while muting and unmuting topics.
fetch_initial_state_data now returns an additional user_topics array to
the client that will maintain the user-topic relationship data.
This will support any future addition of new features to modify the
relationship between a user-topic pair.
This commit adds the relevent backend code and schema for the new
event.
This was for the old /messages/latest API that was removed in commit
e06722657a.
If we wanted a new check like this, it shouldn’t go in zulip_finish,
because that only runs when the client gets an asynchronous response
from polling an initially-empty queue, and not when the client gets a
synchronous response from polling a nonempty queue.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
For the same reason as `handler_id` has, we define `_request`
as an attribute. Note that the name `request` is already taken.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We previously forked tornado.autoreload to work around a problem where
it would crash if you introduce a syntax error and not recover if you
fix it (https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/issues/2398).
A much more maintainable workaround for that issue, at least in
current Tornado, is to use tornado.autoreload as the main module.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
When `update_message` events were updated to have a consistent
format for both normal message updates/edits and special
rendering preview updates, the logic used in the tornado event
queue processor to identify the special events for sending
notifications no longer applied.
Updates that logic to use the `rendering_only` flag (if present)
that was added to the `update_message` event format to identify
if the event processor should potentially send notifications to
users.
For upgrade compatibility, if `rendering_only` flag is not present,
uses previous event structure and checks for the absence of the
`user_id` property, which indicated the special rendering preview
updates.
Fixes#16022.
`cachify` is essentially caching the return value of a function using only
the non-keyword-only arguments as the key.
The use case of the function in the backend can be sufficiently covered by
`functools.lru_cache` as an unbound cache. There is no signficant difference
apart from `cachify` overlooking keyword-only arguments, and
`functools.lru_cache` being conveniently typed.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <359101898@qq.com>
This replaces the temporary (and testless) fix in
24b1439e93 with a more permanent
fix.
Instead of checking if the user is a bot just before
sending the notifications, we now just don't enqueue
notifications for bots. This is done by sending a list
of bot IDs to the event_queue code, just like other
lists which are used for creating NotificationData objects.
Credit @andersk for the test code in `test_notification_data.py`.
A SIGTERM can show up at any point in the ioloop, even in places which
are not prepared to handle it. This results in the process ignoring
the `sys.exit` which the SIGTERM handler calls, with an uncaught
SystemExit exception:
```
2021-11-09 15:37:49.368 ERR [tornado.application:9803] Uncaught exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/http1connection.py", line 238, in _read_message
delegate.finish()
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/httpserver.py", line 314, in finish
self.delegate.finish()
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/routing.py", line 251, in finish
self.delegate.finish()
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/web.py", line 2097, in finish
self.execute()
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/web.py", line 2130, in execute
**self.path_kwargs)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/gen.py", line 307, in wrapper
yielded = next(result)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tornado/web.py", line 1510, in _execute
result = method(*self.path_args, **self.path_kwargs)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zerver/tornado/handlers.py", line 150, in get
request = self.convert_tornado_request_to_django_request()
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zerver/tornado/handlers.py", line 113, in convert_tornado_request_to_django_request
request = WSGIRequest(environ)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/wsgi.py", line 66, in __init__
script_name = get_script_name(environ)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2021-11-08-05-10-23/zerver/tornado/event_queue.py", line 611, in <lambda>
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, lambda signum, stack: sys.exit(1))
SystemExit: 1
```
Supervisor then terminates the process with a SIGKILL, which results
in dropping data held in the tornado process, as it does not dump its
queue.
The only command which is safe to run in the signal handler is
`ioloop.add_callback_from_signal`, which schedules the callback to run
during the course of the normal ioloop. This callbacks does an
orderly shutdown of the server and the ioloop before exiting.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This fixes a bug where email notifications were sent for wildcard
mentions even if the `enable_offline_email_notifications` setting was
turned off.
This was because the `notification_data` class incorrectly considered
`wildcard_mentions_notify` as an indeoendent setting, instead of a wrapper
around `enable_offline_email_notifications` and `enable_offline_push_notifications`.
Also add a test for this case.
This commit adds "user_settings_object" field to
client_capabilities which will be used to determine
if the client needs 'update_display_settings' and
'update_global_notifications' event.
Return zulip_merge_base alongside zulip_version
in `/register`, `/event` and `/server_settings`
endpoint so that the value can be used by other
clients.
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
* `stream_name`: This field is actually redundant. The email/push
notifications handlers don't use that field from the dict, and they
anyways query for the message, so we're safe in deleting this field,
even if in the future we end up needing the stream name.
* `timestamp`: This is totally unused by the email/push notification
handlers, and aren't sent to push clients either.
* `type` is used only for the push notifications handler, since only
push notifications can be revoked, so we move them to only run there.
We will later use this data to include text like:
`<sender> mentioned @<user_group>` instead of the current
`<sender> mentioned you` when someone mentions a user group
the current user is a part of in email/push notification.
Part of #13080.
This removes some complexity from the event_queue module.
To avoid code duplication, we reduce the `is_notifiable` methods to
internally just call the `trigger` methods and check their return value.
* Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the
dataclass introduced in 951b49c048.
* The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way
which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've
earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e.
So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts
which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion.
* We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message
message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style.
* There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests.
Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted
(5a642cea11).
With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods.
So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was
muted, and the test needs to be updated.
* In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which
generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls,
we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments,
so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives.
* Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events,
we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment
there.
This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into
our new `notification_data` module.
We already have this data in the `flags` for each user, so no need to
send this set/list in the event dictionary.
The `flags` in the event dict represent the after-message-update state,
so we can't avoid sending `prior_mention_user_ids`.
Since `flags` here could be iterated through multiple times
(to check for push/email notifiability), we use `Collection`.
Inspired by 871e73ab8f.
The other change here in the `event_queue` code is prep for using
the `UserMessageNotificationsData` class there.
This is separate from the next commit for ease of testing.
To verify that the compatibility code works correctly, all message send
and event_queue tests from our test suite should pass on just this commit.
Unlike `receiver_is_off_zulip`, fetching from a dict is pretty cheap,
so we can calculate `online_push_enabled` along with the other
variables.
This is a prep change to start using the dataclass introduced in the
earlier commit in this code.
This gives us a single place where all user data for the message
send event is calculated, and is a prep change for introducing
a TypedDict or dataclass to keep this data toghether.
We have already calculated these values, so storing them should not cause
significant performance degradation.
This is a prep chenge for sending a few more flags through internal_data,
namely if `sender_is_muted`.
* In `event_queue.py`, only the sender and recipient users who have muted
the sender will have the "read" flag set.
* We already skip enqueueing notifications for users who've muted the sender
after 58da384da3.
* The queue consume functions for email and push notifications already
check filter messages which have been read before sending notifications.
* So, the "read" logic in `event_queue.py` is unnecessary, and the
processing power saved from not enqueueing notifications for a single
user should be insignificant, so we remove these checks all toghether.
Prakhar Pratyush
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Sahil Batra
Kartik Srivastava
Zixuan James Li
Lauryn Menard
Zixuan James Li
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Alex Vandiver
rht
Gaurav Pandey