Updates the HTML docs to match changes to the Desk.com website,
including all new screenshots for the custom action workflow.
Tests four types of messages that could be sent as notifications from
Desk.com. Desk.com allows an account administrator to send any text
in a custom action, so there isn't a standard format.
Custom actions send URL-encoded POST data, the test fixtures contain
URL-encoded text like what could be sent by a custom action configured
as described in the Zulip Integrations documentation to post a new
message to a stream. (See also #2169, errors in this documentation.)
New zerver.tests.webhooks.test_deskdotcom.DeskDotComHookTests:
* Static text: minimal plain text string
* Case updated: activity alert with link to a Desk.com case and message
* Unicode text Italian: activity alert with message in Italian
* Unicode text Japanese: activity alert with message in Japanese
Each posts a new message in the deskdotcom stream.
Tested on Ubuntu 14.04. I created the fixtures with Emacs, I would
appreciate if someone can check that the Italian and Japanese messages
look ok. I used the same text for a live test and it displayed correctly.
Fixes#2031
Add is_truncated param for cases when we know that there were more commits
but we dont know actual number and want just inform about existing of the rest.
bulk_create.bulk_create_users is only called by initialize_voyager_db.py and
populate_db.py, both of which only have realms with single domains.
Part of a larger project to remove the Realm.domain field.
No change in behavior. The for_you block had already been removed in
portico.html long ago in a6889080ce. The
contents of the block are still present in the non-portico 404.html
and 5xx.html error pages.
Currently refactoring the Realm and RealmAlias portions of models.py to no
longer use Realm.domain. Move various functions related and not-related to
the two model objects to more conventional places in the file.
No change to behavior.
Previously, if a new message arrived between when a user is subscribed
to the default streams and when the user's initial messages are
queried, we would try to create two UserMessage rows for the same
Message, resulting in an IntegrityError crash. We fix this and add a
test for that race condition.
This migration ensures that all historically uploaded files from
before we started tracking files in the Zulip database via the
Attachment model have Attachment objects.
This has been tested by tabbott against a production server to ensure
that it results in all old uploaded files having corresponding
attachment objects.
Merging this change is a key prerequisite for making our adding
attachment access controls in an enforcing fashion.
In Django 1.10, the get_token function returns a salted version of
csrf token which changes whenever get_token is called. This gives
us wrong result when we compare the state after returning from
Google authentication servers. The solution is to unsalt the token
and use that token to find the HMAC so that we get the same value
as long as t he token is same.
Needed in case the user was allowed to join the realm when they got the
confirmation email, but is no longer allowed to do so. Check was previously
applied to invited users (those with a prereg_user.referred_by), and is now
applied regardless of how they get to accounts_register.
Does change/fix behavior in various corner cases when the domain passed in
to HomepageForm and subdomain passed in to HomepageForm correspond to
different realms.
If the user comes in to HomepageForm with a set subdomain, use that to
determine the signup realm instead of the email address.
In the non-REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS case, still allow using the email address
if no subdomain is passed.
Ensure domain and subdomain correspond to the same realm when being passed
to forms.HomepageForm. Previously this was not the case when e.g. we got
here via the /register/<domain> endpoint.
This also effectively disables the register/<domain> endpoint when
REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS, or rather, foo.server.org/register/bar.com will try
to register you for the realm with string_id foo rather than realm with
domain bar.com.
`django.contrib.auth.get_user` function is updated in Django 1.10, due to
which everytime we update the password of the user the password hash changes.
This causes authentication failure. Previously, our code worked correctly
because we use our own session middleware and the `get_user` code had a
conditional statement which allowed our code to bypass the authentication
code.
Previously, the way that render_messages was calling bugdown meant
that the preview feature didn't have access to realm data like the
list of users or streams, resulting in previews for those elements
being wrong.
Now render_message_backend uses zerver.lib.render_markdown to render
messages correctly.
[Commit message tweaked and test added by tabbott]
No change to behavior. non_mit_mailing_list never returned False, so it was
never possible to reach the line "Otherwise, the user is an MIT mailing
list, and .."
send_event() expects a list of user ids (ints) except for the special case
of messages. This commit:
1. Fixes this in the call to send_event() in do_send_typing_notification()
2. Renames the variables in do_send_typing_notification() to better reflect
their content (for example, recipient_ids instead of recipients).
3. Renames the id field in the dicts sent in the typing event body (sender,
recipients) to user_id.
4. Adds assertions to the tests to verify that the tornado event user ids
are the same as the recipients in the event body.
5. Adds assertions to the tests to verify that the tornado event user
ids and the recipient user ids (in the event body) are the same as the
expected user ids (obtained from the emails using
get_user_profile_by_email)
6. Changes all assertTrues to assertEquals in the tests
This fixes#2151.
This makes it possible to configure only certain authentication
methods to be enabled on a per-realm basis.
Note that the authentication_methods_dict function (which checks what
backends are supported on the realm) requires an in function import
due to a circular dependency.
In fe1ba6f3eb, we change our auth
decorators etc. to use request.POST/request.GET rather than the (now
removed request.REQUEST). This broke sending messages via our
websockets codepath, because we failed to update the artificial
requests we generate to use request._post as well.
We recently made it so that a cross-realm bot can only send
messages to one realm at a time. (It can send to a realm
outside of its offical realm, but only one of them.) This
test adds coverage for that.
Disallow Realm.string_id's like "streams", "about", and several hundred
others. Also restrict string_id's to be at least 3 characters long, and only
use characters in [a-z0-9-].
Does not restrict realms created by the create_realm.py management command.
Previously realm_name and realm_subdomain defalted to None, which when
posted to /accounts/register, are submitted as u'None'. "None" is an invalid
Realm.subdomain, since subdomains can't have capital letters.
Before it was in UserSignUpTest, now it is in RealmCreationTest. The diff
makes it look like test_user_default_language is the target of the move,
but it isn't.
If a stream is public, we now send notifications to all realm users
if the name or description of the stream changes. For private
streams, the behavior remains the same.
We do this by introducing a method called
can_access_stream_user_ids().
(showell helped with this fix)
Fixes#2195
We use the queries_captured() context manager in our tests
to capture queries that happen during certain actions. Usually
we use the list of queries to validate that we're not doing
too many database calls.
For most tests the database calls are fairly deterministic,
but SAVEPOINT-related things seem to be more random, and the
number of savepoints is usually not relevant to what the test
is trying to prevent, which is more serious problems like
O(N) database fetches.
This (1) removes the check on whether the domain of the email matches
the Realm.domain of an existing realm and (2) avoids setting `realm =
get_realm(domain)` in the realm creation flow, which would cause the
wrong code path to be followed in the event that the domain in a
user's email address happens to match a deactivated realm.
Removes the uniqueness constraint on RealmAlias.domain, and adds a function
can_add_alias that checks for uniqueness conditional on
settings.REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS.
Previously, we set restrict_to_domain and invite_required differently
depending on whether we were setting up a community or a corporate
realm. Setting restrict_to_domain requires validation on the domain of the
user's email, which is messy in the web realm creation flow, since we
validate the user's email before knowing whether the user intends to set up
a corporate or community realm. The simplest solution is to have the realm
creation flow impose as few restrictions as possible (community defaults),
and then worry about restrict_to_domain etc. after the user is already in.
We set the test suite to explictly use the old defaults, since several of
the tests depend on the old defaults.
This commit adds a database migration.
This test seems intended to verify registration in the case of a
unique completely open domain; but because of the mit.edu realm, it
instead tested that a logic bug in the non-subdomains case was
present.
We now send dictionaries for cross-realm bots. This led to the
following changes:
* Create get_cross_realm_dicts() in actions.py.
* Rename the page_params field to cross_realm_bots.
* Fix some back end tests.
* Add cross_realm_dict to people.js.
* Call people.add for cross-realm bots (if they are not already part of the realm).
* Remove hack to add in feedback@zulip.com on the client side.
* Add people.is_cross_realm_email() and use it in compose.js.
* Remove util.string_in_list_case_insensitive().
In preparation for a change to do_create_realm where we will use the
database default for restricted_to_domain rather than computing it within
do_create_realm, and due to which do_create_realm will no longer know
whether we are creating an open realm or not.
Step 0 of a two step process:
1. Replace all occurances of get_realm(domain) with
get_realm_by_string_id(string_id)
2. Rename get_realm_by_string_id to get_realm.
Adds a database migration, adds a new string_id argument to the management
realm creation command, and adds a short name field to the web realm
creation form when REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS is False.
Does a database migration to rename Realm.subdomain to
Realm.string_id, and makes Realm.subdomain a property. Eventually,
Realm.string_id will replace Realm.domain as the handle by which we
retrieve Realm objects.
We now simply exclude all cross-realm bots from the set of emails
under consideration, and then if the remaining emails are all in
the same realm, we're good.
This fix changes two behaviors:
* You can no longer send a PM to an ordinary user in another realm
by piggy-backing a cross-realm bot on to the message. (This was
basically a bug, but it would never manifest under current
configurations.)
* You will be able to send PMs to multiple cross-realm bots at once.
(This was an arbitrary restriction. We don't really care about this
scenario much yet, and it fell out of the new implementation.)
We can currently send a PM to a user in another realm, as long
as we copy a cross-realm bot from the same realm. This loophole
doesn't yet affect us in practice--all cross-realm bots are
generally configured for the "admin" realm like the old zulip.com--
but we should lock it down in a subsequent commit.
Having each condition in a separate test was confusing to read,
especially since the tests were doing inconsistent setup, sometimes
calling user2 the user from 2.example.com realm and other times
calling user2 the cross-bot realm, etc.
Umair Khan
hackerkid
Steve Howell
Feorlen
Tomasz Kolek
Rishi Gupta
Tim Abbott
sinwar
Igor Tokarev
paxapy
Mohsen Ibrahim
Arpith Siromoney
Meena Rajan
umkay
Kevin Chen
K.Kanakhin