type().__name__ is sufficient, and much readable than type(), so it's
better to use the former for keys.
We also make the classes consistent in forming the keys in the format
type(self).__name__:identifier and adjust logger.warning and statsd to
take advantage of that and simply log the key().
This commit mostly makes our tests less
noisy, since emails are no longer an important
detail of sending messages (they're not even
really used in the API).
It also sets us up to have more scrutiny
on delivery_email/email in the future
for things that actually matter. (This is
a prep commit for something along those
lines, kind of hard to explain the full
plan.)
Note that while the test mocks the actual message
send, we now have a `get_stream` call in the queue
worker, so we have to set up a real stream for
testing (or we could have mocked that as well, but
it didn't seem necessary). The setup queries add
to the amount of queries reported by the test,
plus the `get_stream` call. I just made the
query count a digits regex, which is a little bit
lame, but I don't think it's worth risking test
flakes for this.
QueueProcessingWorker and LoopQueueProcessingWorker are abstract classes
meant to be subclassed by a class that will define its own consume()
or consume_batch() method. ABCs are suited for that and we can tag
consume/consume_batch with the @abstractmethod wrapper which will
prevent subclasses that don't define these methods properly to be
impossible to even instantiate (as opposed to only crashing once
consume() is called). It's also nicely detected by mypy, which will
throw errors such as this on invalid use:
error: Only concrete class can be given where "Type[TestWorker]" is
expected
error: Cannot instantiate abstract class 'TestWorker' with abstract
attribute 'consume'
Due to it being detected by mypy, we can remove the test
test_worker_noconsume which just tested the old version of this -
raising an exception when the unimplemented consume() gets called. Now
it can be handled already on the linter level.
LoopQueueProcessingWorker can handle exceptions inside consume_batch in
a similar manner to how QueueProcessingWorker handles exceptions inside
consume.
We add PushNotificationBouncerRetryLaterError as an exception to signal
an error occurred when trying to communicate with the bouncer and it
should be retried. We use JsonableError as the base class, because this
signal will need to work in two roles:
1. When the push notification was being issued by the queue worker
PushNotificationsWorker, it will signal to the worker to requeue the
event and try again later.
2. The exception will also possibly be raised (this will be added in the
next commit) on codepaths coming from a request to an API endpoint (for
example to add a token, to users/me/apns_device_token). In that case,
it'll be needed to provide a good error to the API user - and basing
this exception on JsonableError will allow that.
A confirmation object is already created when
do_send_confirmation_email is called just above.
Tweaked by tabbott to remove an unnecessary somewhat hacky database
query.
This should dramatically improve the queue processor's performance in
cases where there's a very high volume of requests on a given endpoint
by a given user, as described in the new docstring.
Until we test this more broadly in production, we won't know if this
is a full solution to the problem, but I think it's likely. We've
never seen the UserActivityInterval worker end up backlogged without a
total queue processor outage, and it should have a similar workload.
Fixes#13180.
Instead of just mocking some fake events, we use the code
path that generates slow query events and publishes them
to SlowQueryWorker.
This test improvement would have got a recent potential regression
caught in code review.
Previous cleanups (mostly the removals of Python __future__ imports)
were done in a way that introduced leading newlines. Delete leading
newlines from all files, except static/assets/zulip-emoji/NOTICE,
which is a verbatim copy of the Apache 2.0 license.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We were seeing errors when pubishing typical events in the form of
`Dict[str, Any]` as the expected type to be a `Union`. So we instead
change the only non-dictionary call, to pass a dict instead of `str`.
These functions don't really belong in actions.py, so we move them out,
into email_mirror_helpers.py. They can't go directly into
email_mirror.py or we'd get circular imports resulting in ImportError.
Closes#2420
We add rate limiting (max X emails withing Y seconds per realm) to the
email mirror. By creating RateLimitedRealmMirror class, inheriting from
RateLimitedObject, and rate_limit_mirror_by_realm function, following a
mechanism used by rate_limit_user, we're able to have this
implementation mostly rely on the already existing, and proven over
time, rate_limiter.py code. The rules are configurable in settings.py in
RATE_LIMITING_MIRROR_REALM_RULES, analogically to RATE_LIMITING_RULES.
Rate limit verification happens in the MirrorWorker in
queue_processors.py. We don't rate limit missed message emails, as due
to using one time addresses, they're not a spam threat.
test_mirror_worker is adapted to the altered MirrorWorker code and a new
test - test_mirror_worker_rate_limiting is added in test_queue_worker.py
to provide coverage for these changes.
We clean up test_mirror_worker for more readability, as well as make it
verify that mirror_email gets called the correct amount of times and use
a correct rcpt_to address, so that the test doesn't fail when some
verification of the address is added in the following commits
implementing rate limiting in the email mirror.
This adds a function that sends provided email to all administrators
of a realm, but in a single email. As a result, send_email now takes
arguments to_user_ids and to_emails instead of to_user_id and
to_email.
We adjust other APIs to match, but note that send_future_email does
not yet support the multiple recipients model for good reasons.
Tweaked by tabbott to modify `manage.py deliver_email` to handle
backwards-compatibily for any ScheduledEmail objects already in the
database.
Fixes#10896.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes#6839.
Because in upcoming commits, we'll want to pass additional per-message
data into do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip, we need to
expand the format for how we represent messages to account for that.
If an exception was thrown inside `send_email` resulting in a retry,
we would include the `failed_tries` data in the event, which turned
out to thrown an exception itself.
This fixes that flow, including deepening the test so that it would
fail if we didn't have the new logic.
This commit just copies all the code from MissedMessageSendingWorker
class to a new EmailSendingWorker class. All the logic to send an email
through a queue was already there. This commit only makes the logic
generic. It does so by creating a special purpose queue called
'email_senders' to send any type of email. To make
MissedMessageSendingWorker still work we derive it from
EmailSendingWorker. All the tests that were testing
MissedMessageSendingWorker now run against EmailSendingWorker.
The original logic is buggy now that emails can belong to (and be
invited to) multiple realms.
The new logic in the `invites` queue worker also avoids the bug where
when the PreregistrationUser was gone by the time the queue worker got
to the invite (e.g., because it'd been revoked), we threw an exception.
[greg: fix upgrade-compatibility logic; add test; explain
revoked-invite race above]
This fixes a regression in 25c669df52.
We were draining the queue in both the superclass and the subclass,
so by the time the subclass started processing events, there were
no events to process. Now the subclass properly uses the events
passed in from the superclass.
Mateusz Mandera
Steve Howell
Ryan Rehman
Vishnu KS
Tim Abbott
Wyatt Hoodes
Anders Kaseorg
Anders Kaseorg
Pragati Agrawal
Raymond Akornor
Robert Hönig
Umair Khan
Rohitt Vashishtha
Rishi Gupta
Greg Price
rht
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Lech Kaiel