This adds a new endpoint /jwt/fetch_api_key that accepts a JWT and can
be used to fetch API keys for a certain user. The target realm is
inferred from the request and the user email is part of the JWT.
A JSON containing an user API key, delivery email and (optionally)
raw user profile data is returned in response.
The profile data in the response is optional and can be retrieved by
setting the POST param "include_profile" to "true" (default=false).
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
This will be useful for re-use for implementation of an endpoint for
obtaining the API by submitting a JWT in the next commits.
It's not a pure refactor, as it requires some tweaks to remote_user_jwt
behavior:
1. The expected format of the request is changed a bit. It used to
expect "user" and "realm" keys, from which the intended email was
just generated by joining with @. Now it just expects "email"
straight-up. The prior design was a bt strange to begin with, so this
might be an improvement actually.
2. In the case of the codepath of new user signup, this will no longer
pre-populate the Full Name in the registration form with the value
from the "user" key. This should be a very minor lost of
functionality, because the "user" value was not going to be a proper
Full Name anyway. This functionality can be restored in a future
commit if desired.
This is an API change, but this endpoint is nearly unused as far as
we're aware.
There was the following bug here:
1. Send an email invite to a user.
2. Have the user sign up via social auth without going through that
invite, meaning either going via a multiuse invite link or just
straight-up Sign up if the org permissions allow.
That resulted in the PreregistrationUser that got generated in step (1)
having 2 Confirmations tied to it - because maybe_send_to_registration
grabbed the object and created a new confirmation link for it. That is a
corrupted state, Confirmation is supposed to be unique.
One could try to do fancy things with checking whether a
PreregistrationUser already have a Confirmation link, but to avoid races
between ConfirmationEmailWorker and maybe_send_to_registration, this
would require taking locks and so on - which gets needlessly
complicated. It's simpler to not have them compete for the same object.
The point of the PreregistrationUser re-use in
maybe_send_to_registration is that if an admin invites a user, setting
their initial streams and role, it'd be an annoying experience if the
user ends up signing up not via the invite and those initial streams
streams etc. don't get set up. But to handle this, we can just copy the
relevant values from the pre-existing prereg_user, rather than re-using
the object itself.
This line was added in 94e099eaab,
presumably because of the
del request.session["multiuse_object_key"]
line that was just above it.
Looks like it should have been removed in
868a763cec, which eliminated that `del`
operation.
This removes ViewFuncT and all the associated type casts with ParamSpec
and Concatenate. This provides more accurate type annotation for
decorators at the cost of making the concatenated parameters
positional-only. This change does not intend to introduce any other
behavioral difference. Note that we retype args in process_view as
List[object] because the view functions can not only be called with
arguments of type str.
Note that the first argument of rest_dispatch needs to be made
positional-only because of the presence of **kwargs.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This modifies the QueryDict when it is mutable, and assign it to `.POST`
after it is turned immutable, as required by django-stubs for this
attribute.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This makes `has_request_variables` more generic, in the sense of the return
value, and also makes it more accurate, in the sense of requiring the
first parameter of the decorated function to be `HttpRequest`, and
preserving the function signature without using `cast`.
This affects some callers of `has_request_variables` or the callers of its
decoratedfunctions in the following manners:
- Decorated non-view functions called directly in other functions cannot
use `request` as a keyword argument. Becasue `Concatenate` turns the
concatenated parameters (`request: HttpRequest` in this case) into
positional-only parameters. Callers of `get_chart_data` are thus
refactored.
- Functions to be decorated that accept variadic keyword arguments must
define `request: HttpRequest` as positional-only. Mypy in strict mode
rejects such functions otherwise because it is possible for the caller to
pass a keyword argument that has the same name as `request` for `**kwargs`.
No defining `request: HttpRequest` as positional-only breaks type safety
because function with positional-or-keyword parameters cannot be considered
a subtype of a function with the same parameters in which some of them are
positional-only.
Consider `f(x: int, /, **kwargs: object) -> int` and `g(x: int,
**kwargs: object) -> int`. `f(12, x="asd")` is valid but `g(12, x="asd")`
is not.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Now that we can assume Python 3.6+, we can use the
email.headerregistry module to replace hacky manual email address
parsing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We can express the same idea more simply by not passing `user` in
cases where it isn't valid for UserActivity.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This makes it mandatory to narrow the type of the user to `UserProfile`
before calling this helper.
This effectively removes the `request.user` check. We do not call login_page
anywhere else without getting through the authentication middleware.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Fixes#21266.
We want to tie the prereg_user to the MultiUseInvite directly rather
than to the MultiUserInvite's confirmation object, because the latter is
not possible. This is because the flow is that after going through the
multiuse invite link, the PreregistrationUser is created together with a
Confirmation object, creating a confirmation link (via
create_confirmation_link) to which then the user is redirected to finish
account creation. This means that the PreregistrationUser is already
tied to a Confirmation, so that attribute is occupied.
This replaces user.is_verified with is_2fa_verified.
The helper does extra checks such that the user being checked for 2fa
authentication status is valid.
`request.user.is_verified` is functionally the same as `is_verified`
from `django_otp.middleware`, except that the former is monkey-patched
onto the user object by the 2FA middleware. We use the latter wrapped
in `is_2fa_verified` instead to avoid accessing the patched attribute.
See also: 6b24d56e59/docs/source/overview.rst (authentication-and-verification)
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
TestMaybeSendToRegistration needs tweaking here, because it wasn't
setting the subdomain for the dummy request, so
maybe_send_to_registration was actually running with realm=None, which
is not right for these tests.
Also, test_sso_only_when_preregistration_user_exists was creating
PreregistrationUser without setting the realm, which was also incorrect.
create_preregistration_user is a footgun, because it takes the realm
from the request. The calling code is supposed to validate that
registration for the realm is allowed
first, but can sometimes do that on "realm" taken from something else
than the request - and later on calls create_preregistration_user, thus
leading to prereg user creation on unvalidated request.realm.
It's safer, and makes more sense, for this function to take the intended
realm as argument, instead of taking the entire request. It follows that
the same should be done for prepare_activation_url.
The codepaths for joining an organization via a multi-use invitation
(accounts_home_from_multiuse_invite and maybe_send_to_registration)
weren't validating whether
the organization the invite was generated for matches the organization
the user attempts to join - potentially allowing an attacker with access
to organization A to generate a multi-use invite and use it to join
organization B within the same deployment, that they shouldn't have
access to.
Adds `realm_web_public_access_enabled` as a realm-specific server
setting potentially returned by the `/get-server-settings` endpoint
so that clients that support browsing of web-public stream content
without an account can generate a login page that supports that
type of access.
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
Fixes “DeprecationWarning: 'jinja2.Markup' is deprecated and will be
removed in Jinja 3.1. Import 'markupsafe.Markup' instead.”
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The user id is a very useful piece of information that the mobile
client should have access to - instead of only getting the email. This
makes it much simpler to impleent clients that might be robust to
changes in email address.
SOCIAL_AUTH_SUBDOMAIN was potentially very confusing when opened by a
user, as it had various Login/Signup buttons as if there was a realm on
it. Instead, we want to display a more informative page to the user
telling them they shouldn't even be there. If possible, we just redirect
them to the realm they most likely came from.
To make this possible, we have to exclude the subdomain from
ROOT_SUBDOMAIN_ALIASES - so that we can give it special behavior.
This utilizes the generic `BaseNotes` we added for multipurpose
patching. With this migration as an example, we can further support
more types of notes to replace the monkey-patching approach we have used
throughout the codebase for type safety.
Alessandro Toppi
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
Zixuan James Li
Lauryn Menard
jai2201
Alex Vandiver
Mateusz Mandera
Vishnu KS