This fixes a bug with the group pm section of our
buddy list. It wasn't updating when you fetched
old private messages.
We had been calling activity.process_loaded_messages() as
part of message_store.do_unread_count_updates(), which was
called sometimes unnecessarily and sometime not called when
we needed to get huddle info.
Now we call it when we need it most, which is when you
click on "Private Messages".
If I try to send a message to an unknown user (which is possible
for some types of realms), then I simply ignore them during the
send codepath, so that I don't later need to patch up their attributes.
We no longer store pm_recipient_count on person objects, but we
instead use a Dict to store them. Then the new API is this:
people.get_recipient_count()
people.incr_recipient_count()
This is controlled through the admin tab and a new field in the Realms
table. This mirrors the behavior of the old hardcoded setting
feature_flags.disable_message_editing. Partially resolves#903.
Previously, we were checking if a particular user was the current user
in dozens of places in the codebase, and correct case-insensitive
checks were not used consistently, leading to bugs like #502.
Move recenter_pointer_on_display, suppress_scroll_pointer_update,
fast_forward_pointer, furthest_read, and server_furthest_read to
a new pointer module in pointer.js.
Like the Stream Subject lists, Private messages are now shown
when the user clicks on the "Private message" link. User can drill in
to get more than 5 conversations. Selecting PMs from the user or group
PM lists on the right sidebar also opens the list & highlights the
selected conversation.
[Edited by tabbott@mit.edu to fix some small bugs.]
add_messages is a good entrypoint for this, since it gets called by:
1) get_old_messages
2) get_events_success (for new messages, via insert_new_messages)
which is all the places that rewrites should happen, but nowhere
where extra work is being done.
(imported from commit 844c33bc32d35aa39c9cdacf42eb7e8ddf5ae63c)
Closing the edit box earlier will make future changes less brittle,
when we, for example, re-narrow based on topic edits.
(imported from commit 36219c5129153beebfefe443932825fdf74abc43)
If we get a topic change, we can change the subject outside the
loop, since we are passed in event.orig_subject. Doing it inside
the loop was mostly harmless, since after you encountered the first
message with the old topic, the condition to change the subject
evaluated to false, but it was still technically O(N), and it was
kind of confusing.
This commit changes behavior in the edge case that you have the
compose box open for a changing subject, but you are in a narrow
that does not have any of the affected messages. After this commit,
the topic in the compose box will still change, which I believe
is the correct behavior.
(imported from commit 2363e432ebe7ae8e07379324ee0bfb52051428e6)
This doesn't affect code when not in testing. It shaves 7 seconds off of casper
test time on my machine.
(imported from commit 7e27fa781bcf16f36d9c8f058427ba57c41068bd)
This experiment has been disabled for everyone for a while: if we
bring something like this back, it is not likely to be exactly the same,
and will be different enough to require a different implementation.
As it is, the summarization code was making a few code paths (rendering
especially) more complex, and is worth removing for simplicity's sake.
(imported from commit 6ac8cdc9f7077a5a1da01ab4268aba3db0bc43f8)
This reverts commit 64aced74012101f3bdbd3a4e6066b46ad8e1f4ea,
which was always intended as temporary code until we upgraded
the back end to support dictionary-style narrow operators.
(imported from commit b8d3a19f3aad3d9d6a26b9dcc07f502c55b18edd)
Chrome was showing a memory leak after many auto-reloads. Emptying the
the collections and removing the event listeners reduces the severity.
Before this change 40 reloads would would grow to about 140MB, now it
stays around 50MB.
(imported from commit 55fbeff9bdd0363bb95929f2981a2de238ff35d8)