This ensures that we exercise the fact that the Zulip installer may be
unpacked to a directory that may not be world-readable.
bc45525369 fixed a recent regression in
this behavior that would have been caught by this commit.
Thumbor and tc-aws have been dragging their feet on Python 3 support
for years, and even the alphas and unofficial forks we’ve been running
don’t seem to be maintained anymore. Depending on these projects is
no longer viable for us.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We had used 2>&1 to redirect stderr to stdout so it could be piped
into ts, but commit dd3cdd6ec5 (#17611)
removed ts, so we no longer need the redirection.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We support Debian as an OS for setting up the Zulip server. But the CI
does not run on pull request to test the setting up of the server on
Debian. Hence, add the check to CI.
Timestamps are logged automatically by GitHub Actions and can be
made visible using log settings easily. Hence we remove the
unnecessary timestamps here to make the logs look much cleaner.
This prevents Zulip CI from eventually consuming large amounts of
storage on one's GitHub account.
I picked a longer retention period for the Puppeteer artifacts because
humans look at those; the production tarballs are unlikely to be used
10 minutes after the run completes as they are just for the next stage
fo the build; certainly 14 days seems ample for any debugging.
The hash keys were missing hash for package.json and yarn.lock
because they were not present since we don't do a full checkout
in this job. We fix this by sending over those files and generating
hashes from them.
I usally verify these cache keys by clicking the Restore <cache>
step dropdown menu and then clicking the Run ... dropdown menu again
to see the generated hash.
All the steps are same from circleci except two steps:
1. The 'Add permissions ...' step is Actions specific as explained
in comments.
2. The step that used upload-artifacts is Actions verison of
presist_to_workspace.
Finally, I should note the duplication in this and zulip-ci
workflow. There are three reason this is not a problem:
1. It will be messy to mush this into zulip-ci workflow only for
benefit of un-duplicating the env and cache restore steps.
2. We needs this on its own workflow if we want to only run it
when production related dependencies are updated.
3. I don't see us updating the duplicated steps between both
workflow. Circle CI config is prefect example for this; nothing
is changed except for adding or updating steps which are not
duplicated.
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Gaurav Pandey
Alex Vandiver
Aman Agrawal
Priyank Patel