This adds the fields `trigger` and `service_email`
to each message event dispatched by outgoing webhook bots.
`trigger` will be used by the Botserver to determine if
a bot is mentioned in the message.
`service_email` will be used by the Botserver to determine
by which outgoing webhook bot the message should be handled.
This should make it easier for us to iterate on a less-dense Zulip.
We create two classes on body, less_dense_mode and more_dense_mode, so
that it's easy as we refactor to separate the two concepts from things
like colors that are independent.
API users, particularly bots, can now send a field
called "widget_content" that will be turned into
a submessage for the web app to look at. (Other
clients can still rely on "content" to be there,
although it's up to the bot author to make the
experience good for those clients as well.)
Right now widget_content will be a JSON string that
encodes a "zform" widget with "choices." Our first
example will be a trivia bot, where users will see
something like this:
Which fruit is orange in color?
[A] orange
[B] blackberry
[C] strawberry
The letters will be turned into buttons on the webapp
and have canned replies.
This commit has a few parts:
- receive widget_content in the request (simply
validating that it's a string)
- parse the JSON in check_message and deeply
validate its structure
- turn it into a submessage in widget.py
This commit adds a view which will be used to process login requests,
adds an AuthenticationTokenForm so that we can use TextField widget for
tokens, and activates two factor authentication code path whenever user
tries to login.
This should significantly improve the user experience for creating
additional accounts on zulipchat.com.
Currently, disabled in production pending some work on visual styling.
This is intended to support our upcoming feature to support copying a
user's customization settings from an existing account that user owns
in another organization.
We essentially stop running create_realm_internal_bots during
every provisioing and move its operations to run from populate db.
In fact to speed things up a bit we actually make populate db call the
funcs which create_realm_internal_bots calls behind the scenes.
Fixes: #9467.
We extract the entire operations of the management command to a
function create_if_missing_realm_internal_bots in the
zerver/lib/onboarding.py. The logic for determining if there are any realm
internal bots which have not been created is extracted to a function
missing_any_realm_internal_bots in actions.py.
This isn't a complete long-term fix, in that ideally we'd be doing
this check at the view layer, but various structural things make that
annoying, and we'll want this test either way.
This improves test coverage for a lot of our webhooks that relied
on ad-hoc methods to handle unexpected event types.
Note that I have deliberately skipped github_legacy, it isn't
advertised and is officially deprecated.
Also, I have refrained from making further changes to Trello, I
believe further improvements to test coverage should be covered
in separate per-webhook commits/PRs.
UnexpectedWebhookEventType is a generic exception that we may
now raise when we encounter a webhook event that is new or one
that we simply aren't aware of.
We've had this sort of logic for GCM for a long time; it's worth
adding for APNS as well.
Writing this is a bit of a reminder that I'm not a fan of how our unit
tests for push notifications work.
We add conditional infinite sleep to this delivery job as a means to
handle case of multiple servers in service to a realm running this
job. In such a scenerio race conditions might arise leading to
multiple deliveries for same message. This way we try to match the
behaviour of what other jobs do in such a case.
Note: We should eventually do something to make such jobs work
while being running on multiple servers.
This revised GitHub auth backend test is inspired by the end-to-end
flow model of the Google auth backend test. My hope is that we will
be able to migrate the rest of the important cases in the GitHub auth
backend tests to this model and then delete what is now
GitHubAuthBackendLegacyTest.
The next step after that will be to merge the GitHub and Google auth
tests (since actually, the actual test functions are basically
identical between the two).
Apparently, the bug here was that we were aliasing the user_profile
variable, so that the results depended on what the last iteration in
the loop landed on.
Since this is a logged-out view, need to actually write code for the
case of deactivated realms.
The change to get_active_user is more for clarity; the Django password
reset form already checks for whether the user is active earlier.
If a user's account has been deactivated, we want to provide a special
error message that makes clear what's going on.
Future work is to provide some administrative controls on whether a
user should be able to re-activate their account.
This query was incorreclty not checking whether a user was deactivated
before managing their subscriptions.
This isn't an important bug, but should prevent some weird corner
cases (like trying to send a notification PM to a deactivated user,
which fails).
Yago González
Tim Abbott
Robert Hönig
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu Ks
Steve Howell
Shubham Dhama
Umair Khan
Rhea Parekh
Aditya Bansal
Michael J. Sullivan