We recently ran into a payload in production that didn't contain
an event type at all. A payload where we can't figure out the event
type is quite rare. Instead of letting these payloads run amok, we
should raise a more informative exception for such unusual payloads.
If we encounter too many of these, then we can choose to conduct a
deeper investigation on a case-by-case basis.
With some changes by Tim Abbott.
We add discussion id and url in the comments and highlighted title to
the body of disscussion message to make it more meaningful and accessible.
Fixes#19938.
We aim to use Zulip topics thoughtfully in displaying messages from
discussions, as well as linking to the discussion in every message so
that it's easy to view them.
Fixes#19938.
This utilizes the generic `BaseNotes` we added for multipurpose
patching. With this migration as an example, we can further support
more types of notes to replace the monkey-patching approach we have used
throughout the codebase for type safety.
9ac55a8cf6 introduced support for
batch updates to stories. However, that commit didn't skip label
removals, as we already do in non-batch story payloads. This led
to an exception for batch story update payloads where labels were
removed but none were added.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This concludes the HttpRequest migration to eliminate arbitrary
attributes (except private ones that are belong to django) attached
to the request object during runtime and migrated them to a
separate data structure dedicated for the purpose of adding
information (so called notes) to a HttpRequest.
The reason for this bug is because of different striping
processes in the backend and frontend, i.e The frontend
checks if the message's `raw_content` has changed to
decide if the `content` of the message should be sent in
the request to the backend, or not. So, it removes the
leading new line ('\n') from the message `raw_content`
when checking it, which is causing the "Error saving edit:
You don't have permission to edit this message" error.
This commit fixes it by removing the leading new line
when cleaning message content.
The bug was explained by @punchagan and its solution
by @timabbott.
This change allow check_webhook to raise an error when a message is
sent and vice versa. This is useful when one payload is not expecting
any output messages.
In addition to event filtering, we add support for registering supported
events for a webhook integration using the webhook_view decorator.
The event types are stored in the view function directly as a function
attribute, and can be later accessed via the module path and the view
function name are given (which is already specified the integrations.py)
Note that the WebhookTestCase doesn't know the name of the view function
and the module of the webhook. WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME needs to be overridden
if we want exceptions to raised when one of our test functions triggered
a unspecified event, but this practice is not enforced.
all_event_type does not need to be given even if event filters are used
in the webhook. But if a list of event types is given, it will be possible
for us to include it in the documentation while ensuring that all the
tested events are included (but not vice versa at the current stage, as
we yet not required all the events included in the list to be tested)
This guarantees that we can always access the list of all the tested
events of a webhook. This feature will be later plumbed to marcos to
display all event types dynamically in doc.md.
JsonableError has two major benefits over json_error:
* It can be raised from anywhere in the codebase, rather than
being a return value, which is much more convenient for refactoring,
as one doesn't potentially need to change error handling style when
extracting a bit of view code to a function.
* It is guaranteed to contain the `code` property, which is helpful
for API consistency.
Various stragglers are not updated because JsonableError requires
subclassing in order to specify custom data or HTTP status codes.
We modify check_send_webhook_message to make it accept three new
parameters: only_events and exclude_events that are retrieved using REQ,
and complete_event_type, which is passed by the incoming webhook view
that is filtered according to the former two parameters.
Part of #18525.
Since FIXTURE_DIR_NAME is the name of the folder that contains the view
and tests modules of the webhook and another folder called "fixtures" that
store the fixtures, it is more appropriate to call it WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME,
especially when we want to refer to the view module using this variable.
We convert the `clean-unused-caches` script to a
python file so we can run it in provision by importing it
instead of running the script, hence saving some time.
Because the payload of V3 will no longer include the description,
We replace the ":" by "." in the message and create the new string
template for trigger messages.
Having the alert state in the message body is useful when alert topics
are not defined by alert description but encoded in the url.
E.g. in large environments having a topic for each alert [alerting] and [ok] would
make it harder to properly track if an alert has been resolved.
When each alert is in a single topic, so far, the alert state has been missing.
This change will add the current alert state and a fitting icon in front
of the alert name.(Similar to the prometheus alertmanager integration)
The test cases have been amended to cover all possible alert states, even
though realistically grafana only fires the ok and alerting states via
webhook.
The screenshot generating mechanism doesn't work for newrelic and
causes error because its configuration file doesn't exist. This
commit fixes the configuration and re-generate the screenshots.
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver
Shlok Patel
PIG208
tushar912
Lefteris Kyriazanos
Mateusz Mandera
Riken Shah
akshatdalton
Tim Abbott
Adam Birds
AdamVB