We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
* Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the
dataclass introduced in 951b49c048.
* The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way
which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've
earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e.
So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts
which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion.
* We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message
message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style.
* There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests.
Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted
(5a642cea11).
With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods.
So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was
muted, and the test needs to be updated.
* In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which
generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls,
we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments,
so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives.
* Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events,
we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment
there.
This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into
our new `notification_data` module.
Earlier, the notification-blocking for messages from muted senders
was a side-effect of we never sending notifications for messages
with the "read" flag.
This commit decouples these two things, as a prep for having new
settings which will allow users to **always** receive email
notifications, including when/if they read the message during the
time the notifications is in the queue.
We still mark muted-sender messages as "read" when they are sent,
because that's desirable anyways.
When a user is muted, in the same request,
we mark any existing unreads from that user
as read.
This is done for all types of messages
(PM/huddle/stream) and regardless of whether
the user was mentioned in them.
This will not break the unread count logic
of the web frontend, because that algorithm
decides which messages to mark as read based
only on the pointer location and the whitespace
at the bottom, not on what messages have already
been marked as read.
Messages sent by muted users are marked as read
as soon as they are sent (or, more accurately,
while creating the database entries itself), regardless
of type (stream/huddle/PM).
ede73ee4cd, makes it easy to
pass a list to `do_send_messages` containing user-ids for
whom the message should be marked as read.
We add the contents of this list to the set of muter IDs,
and then pass it on to `create_user_messages`.
This benefits from the caching behaviour of `get_muting_users`
and should not cause performance issues long term.
The consequence is that messages sent by muted users will
not contribute to unread counts and notifications.
This commit does not affect the unread messages
(if any) present just before muting, but only handles
subsequent messages. Old unreads will be handled in
further commits.
This commit defines a new function `get_muting_users`
which will return a list of IDs of users who have muted
a given user.
Whenever someone mutes/unmutes a user, the cache will be
flushed, and subsequently when that user sends a message,
the cache will be populated with the list of people who
have muted them (maybe empty).
This data is a good candidate for caching because-
1. The function will later be called from the message send
codepath, and we try to minimize database queries there.
2. The entries will be pretty tiny.
3. The entries won't churn too much. An average user will
send messages much more frequently than get muted/unmuted,
and the first time penalty of hitting the db and populating
the cache should ideally get amortized by avoiding several
DB lookups on subsequent message sends.
The actual code to call this function will be written in
further commits.
This makes it so that RealmAuditLog entries are
created when a user mutes/unmutes someone.
We don't really need to store the time, but we
do so anyways, because the `event_time` field
is currently a non-nullable one in the `RealmAuditLog`
model, and making it nullable would risk allowing
not specifying the time in other more important
code which also creates `RealmAuditLog` entries.
This also fixes an incorrect test of successfully
unmuting with the API. Earlier it did not mock
the time in the `views/muting.py` code to return
`mute_time`.
Previously, when unmuting a user, we used to make
two database fetches - one to verify that the user
is has been muted before, and one while actually
unmuting the user.
This reduces that to one, by passing around the
`MutedUser` object fetched in the first round.
Since the new function returns `Optional[MutedUser]`,
we need to use a hack for events tests, because
mypy does not yet use the type inferred from
`assert foo is not None` in nested functions like lambdas.
See python/mypy@8780d45507.
Instead of using internal functions for data setup,
we use the API so that these tests are more
end-to-end.
This commit also removes a now unnecessary
`if date_muted is None` check.
This cleans up some code added in 3bfcaa3968.
Also fixes some indentation to be more readable:
- `mock.patch` is in a single line.
- Dictionaries are one field per line.
Adds backend code for the mute users feature.
This is just infrastructure work (database
interactions, helpers, tests, events, API docs
etc) and does not involve any behavioral/semantic
aspects of muted users.
Adds POST and DELETE endpoints, to keep the
URL scheme mostly consistent in terms of `users/me`.
TODOs:
1. Add tests for exporting `zulip_muteduser` database table.
2. Add dedicated methods to python-zulip-api to be used
in place of the current `client.call_endpoint` implementation.
Steve Howell
rht
Anders Kaseorg
Ganesh Pawar
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas