Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This changes the payload that is used
to populate `page_params` for the webapp,
as well as responses to the once-every-50-seconds
presence pings.
Now our dictionary of users only has these
two fields in the value:
- activity_timestamp
- idle_timestamp
Example data:
{
6: Object { idle_timestamp: 1585746028 },
7: Object { active_timestamp: 1585745774 },
8: Object { active_timestamp: 1585745578,
idle_timestamp: 1585745400}
}
We only send the slimmer type of payload
to clients that have set `slim_presence`
to True.
Note that this commit does not change the format
of the event data, which still looks like this:
{
website: {
client: 'website',
pushable: false,
status: 'active',
timestamp: 1585745225
}
}
We try to use the correct variation of `email`
or `delivery_email`, even though in some
databases they are the same.
(To find the differences, I temporarily hacked
populate_db to use different values for email
and delivery_email, and reduced email visibility
in the zulip realm to admins only.)
In places where we want the "normal" realm
behavior of showing emails (and having `email`
be the same as `delivery_email`), we use
the new `reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` helper.
A couple random things:
- I fixed any error messages that were leaking
the wrong email
- a test that claimed to rely on the order
of emails no longer does (we sort user_ids
instead)
- we now use user_ids in some place where we used
to use emails
- for IRC mirrors I just punted and used
`reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` in most places
- for MIT-related tests, I didn't fix email
vs. delivery_email unless it was obvious
I also explicitly reset the realm to a "normal"
realm for a couple tests that I frankly just didn't
have the energy to debug. (Also, we do want some
coverage on the normal case, even though it is
"easier" for tests to pass if you mix up `email`
and `delivery_email`.)
In particular, I just reset data for the analytics
and corporate tests.
We now have this API...
If you really just need to log in
and not do anything with the actual
user:
self.login('hamlet')
If you're gonna use the user in the
rest of the test:
hamlet = self.example_user('hamlet')
self.login_user(hamlet)
If you are specifically testing
email/password logins (used only in 4 places):
self.login_by_email(email, password)
And for failures uses this (used twice):
self.assert_login_failure(email)
This reduces query counts in some cases, since
we no longer need to look up the user again. In
particular, it reduces some noise when we
count queries for O(N)-related tests.
The query count is usually reduced by 2 per
API call. We no longer need to look up Realm
and UserProfile. In most cases we are saving
these lookups for the whole tests, since we
usually already have the `user` objects for
other reasons. In a few places we are simply
moving where that query happens within the
test.
In some places I shorten names like `test_user`
or `user_profile` to just be `user`.
This flag affects page_params and the
payload you get back from POSTs to this
url:
users/me/presence
The flag does not yet affect the
presence events that get sent to a
client.
Previously, if the user had interacted with the Zulip mobile app in
the last ~140 seconds, it's likely the mobile app had sent presence
data to the Zulip server, which in turns means that the Zulip server
might not send that user mobile push notifications (or email
notifications) about new messages for the next few minutes.
The email notifications behavior is potentially desirable, but the
push notifications behavior is definitely not -- a private message
reply to something you sent 2 minutes ago is definitely something you
want a push notification for.
This commit partially addresses that issue, by ignoring presence data
from the ZulipMobile client when determining whether the user is
currently engaging with a Zulip client (essentially, we're only
considering desktop activity as something that predicts the user is
likely to see a desktop notification or is otherwise "online").
Previously, we had some expensive-to-calculate keys in
zulip_default_context, especially around enabled authentication
backends, which in total were a significant contributor to the
performance of various logged-out pages. Now, these keys are only
computed for the login/registration pages where they are needed.
This is a moderate performance optimization for the loading time of
many logged-out pages.
Closes#11929.
This is a major rewrite of the billing system. It moves subscription
information off of stripe Subscriptions and into a local CustomerPlan
table.
To keep this manageable, it leaves several things unimplemented
(downgrading, etc), and a variety of other TODOs in the code. There are also
some known regressions, e.g. error-handling on /upgrade is broken.
Before, presence information for an entire realm could only be queried via
the `POST /api/v1/users/me/presence` endpoint. However, this endpoint also
updates the presence information for the user making the request. Therefore,
bot users are not allowed to access this endpoint because they don't have
any presence data.
This commit adds a new endpoint `GET /api/v1/realm/presence` that just
returns the presence information for the realm of the caller.
Fixes#10651.
Apparently, the bug here was that we were aliasing the user_profile
variable, so that the results depended on what the last iteration in
the loop landed on.
While maybe these don't all belong in this test file, the overall
effect is that we now have quite good test coverage on
analytics/views.py.
It'd be nice to add some more assert statements for specific values
being present in the pages, but since we're not really working on that
part of the product, it's not a priority yet.
This system was written years ago and has been working well the whole
time, but having unit tests for it will help future developers in
understanding what the intent is.
This fixes an unpleasant regression in
f5edeb01ae, where we stopped correctly
filtering users who have an open browser session that's idle. These
users are tagged as "UserPresence.IDLE" with an current timestamp in
the database, and should be treated as idle for presence purposes.
As a result, if you had an open Zulip browser session, you incorrectly
wouldn't get missed-message emails for PMs and mentions before this fix.
We don't have our linter checking test files due to ultra-long strings
that are often present in test output that we verify. But it's worth
at least cleaning out all the ultra-long def lines.
This fixes most cases where we were assigning a user to
the var email and then calling get_user_profile_by_email with
that var.
(This was fixed mostly with a script.)
The example_user() function is specifically designed for
AARON, hamlet, cordelia, and friends, and it allows a concise
way of using their built-in user profiles. Eventually, the
widespread use of example_user() should help us with refactorings
such as moving the tests users out of the "zulip.com" realm
and deprecating get_user_profile_by_email.
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Wyatt Hoodes
Hemanth V. Alluri
Anders Kaseorg
Rishi Gupta
Vishnu Ks
Kevin Lin
Rhea Parekh
Alena Volkova
rht
Umair Khan
Vishnu Ks
Steve Howell