This commit adds the following:
1. A reaction model that consists of a user, a message and an emoji that
are unique together (a user cannot react to a particular message more
than once with the same emoji)
2. A reaction event that looks like:
{
'type': 'reaction',
'op': 'add',
'message_id': 3,
'emoji_name': 'doge',
'user': {
'user_id': 1,
'email': 'hamlet@zulip.com',
'full_name': 'King Hamlet'
}
}
3. A new API endpoint, /reactions, that accepts POST requests to add a
reaction to a message
4. A migration to add the new model to the database
5. Tests that check that
(a) Invalid requests cannot be made
(b) The reaction event body contains all the info
(c) The reaction event is sent to the appropriate users
(d) Reacting more than once fails
It is still missing important features like removing emoji and
fetching them alongside messages.
Refactor list_to_streams and create_streams_if_needed to take a list
of dictionaries, instead of a list of stream names. This is
preparation for being able to pass additional arguments into the
stream creation process.
An important note: This removes a set of validation code from the
start of add_subscriptions_backend; doing so is correct because
list_to_streams has that same validation code already.
[with some tweaks by tabbott for clarity]
Previously, we rejected the HEAD requests that the trello integration
uses to check if the server accepts the integration.
Add decorator for returning 200 status code if request is HEAD.
Fixes: #2311.
No change in behavior. The for_you block had already been removed in
portico.html long ago in a6889080ce. The
contents of the block are still present in the non-portico 404.html
and 5xx.html error pages.
In Django 1.10, the get_token function returns a salted version of
csrf token which changes whenever get_token is called. This gives
us wrong result when we compare the state after returning from
Google authentication servers. The solution is to unsalt the token
and use that token to find the HMAC so that we get the same value
as long as t he token is same.
Needed in case the user was allowed to join the realm when they got the
confirmation email, but is no longer allowed to do so. Check was previously
applied to invited users (those with a prereg_user.referred_by), and is now
applied regardless of how they get to accounts_register.
Ensure domain and subdomain correspond to the same realm when being passed
to forms.HomepageForm. Previously this was not the case when e.g. we got
here via the /register/<domain> endpoint.
This also effectively disables the register/<domain> endpoint when
REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS, or rather, foo.server.org/register/bar.com will try
to register you for the realm with string_id foo rather than realm with
domain bar.com.
Previously, the way that render_messages was calling bugdown meant
that the preview feature didn't have access to realm data like the
list of users or streams, resulting in previews for those elements
being wrong.
Now render_message_backend uses zerver.lib.render_markdown to render
messages correctly.
[Commit message tweaked and test added by tabbott]
This (1) removes the check on whether the domain of the email matches
the Realm.domain of an existing realm and (2) avoids setting `realm =
get_realm(domain)` in the realm creation flow, which would cause the
wrong code path to be followed in the event that the domain in a
user's email address happens to match a deactivated realm.
We now send dictionaries for cross-realm bots. This led to the
following changes:
* Create get_cross_realm_dicts() in actions.py.
* Rename the page_params field to cross_realm_bots.
* Fix some back end tests.
* Add cross_realm_dict to people.js.
* Call people.add for cross-realm bots (if they are not already part of the realm).
* Remove hack to add in feedback@zulip.com on the client side.
* Add people.is_cross_realm_email() and use it in compose.js.
* Remove util.string_in_list_case_insensitive().
Adds a database migration, adds a new string_id argument to the management
realm creation command, and adds a short name field to the web realm
creation form when REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS is False.
Does a database migration to rename Realm.subdomain to
Realm.string_id, and makes Realm.subdomain a property. Eventually,
Realm.string_id will replace Realm.domain as the handle by which we
retrieve Realm objects.