When quoting a message with fenced code blocks without a language,
we used to have ambiguity in which '```' fence terminates the quote.
This commit adds explicitly non-interfering fences, which fixes the
above issue as well as makes the raw message easier to quickly read.
Fixes#12446.
In e42c3f7418, we made the assumption
that compose_pm_pill.get_recipient() would return no users for stream
messages. It turns out, due to the confusing name of
compose_state.recipient (which we just renamed to
compose_state.private_message_recipient), this assumption was wrong.
As a result, when composing a stream message using the reply hotkeys,
we'd end up sending typing notiifcations to the person who sent the
message we're replying to as though a PM was being composed.
We fix this by avoiding passing an (expected to be unused) value for
private_message_recipient to compose_state.start.
The compose_state.recipient field was only actually the recipient for
the message if it was a private_message_recipient (in the sense of
other code); we store the stream in compose_state.stream instead.
As a result, the name was quite confusing, resulting in the
possibility of problematic correctness bugs where code assumes this
field has a valid value for stream messages. Fix this by changing it
to compose_state.private_message_recipient for clarity.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Because of the separate declarations, ESLint would convert them to
`let` and then trigger the `prefer-const` error.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
When you just sent a large message, our logic for "you need to scroll"
notifications did not correctly take into account the height of the
compose box. This was easily reproduced when sending very long
messages. The correct solution requires a bit of math to compute what
the visible area will look like after the compose box is closed.
This should be the final fix to #11138.
We had a bug where if you started typing a message
and then used quote/reply (after the fact), we
would overwrite the user's original message.
The bug was kind of subtle--the internal call
to "respond" to the message would select the message
text, and then `smart_insert` would replace the
selection, unless it was Firefox.
Note that we now also allow you to cross-post
replies, which is a plausible scenario, although
possibly unintentional at times, too. I'm erring
on the side of giving the user control here, but
I'll add a warning in the next commit. Our compose
fade feature should also prevent unintentional
mixes here, too.
We often need to go to the server to get raw content.
The exceptions are messages for which we've already
fetched the raw content for some other reason (maybe
a previous quote-and-reply) or which are locally echoed.
Whether we can get the raw content locally or from
the server, the replace_content() logic is the same.
Apparently, we didn't have one of these, and thus had a moderate
number of generally very old violations in the codebase. Fix this and
clear the ones that exist..
The `replying_to_message` field was used in some
early versions of compose fade, but it has no more
use in the current code.
The drafts implementation didn't really make any sense,
anyway, as we were claiming to reply to the same
message we were drafting.
The stream/topic edit areas now have these ids:
#stream_message_recipient_stream
#stream_message_recipient_topic
They are pretty verbose, but being able to grep
for these without noise does have some value.
Also adds relevant tests and documentation. We currently
do not narrow to a new topic, and instead just narrow to
the stream. Similarly, we do not narrow to a PM if any of
the recipients are invalid.
This is a nice performance optimization for the rare case where the
user does quote-and-reply on a message, aborts the compose, and then
re-does the quote-and-reply.
Use the placeholder `[Quoting…]` when quoting and replying before the
quote has been added to the message. Also, add tests to the
`compose_actions` Node tests for the new behavior.
Fix#10705.
When we nudge up the feed to prevent the compose box
from obscuring it, we now have 20 pixels of separation
instead of 5. Before this fix, it was hard for users
to know whether they had any messages being covered.
We now have a callback for whenever the compose
box gets autosized by our old vendored version
of the autosize widget. It calls code to
scroll up the message feed if we are newly
covering it.
This is part of work to break some of our
nastier circular dependencies in preparation
for our es6 migration.
This commit should facilitate loading leaf-like
modules such as people.js before all of the things
that reload.js depends on.
We now use narrow_state.filter() everywhere. The
two functions did the same thing, and I slightly
prefer the concise name, which was already in use
in lots of places.
This commit prepares the frontend code to be consumed by webpack.
It is a hack: In theory, modules should be declaring and importing the
modules they depend on and the globals they expose directly.
However, that requires significant per-module work, which we don't
really want to block moving our toolchain to webpack on.
So we expose the modules by setting window.varName = varName; as
needed in the js files.
If atleast one of the private_message_recipients is invalid, compose
box will not be opened.
Thanks to Aastha Gupta <aastha.gupta4104@gmail.com> for some preliminary
work on this.
This is preparation for enabling an eslint indentation configuration.
90% of these changes are just fixes for indentation errors that have
snuck into the codebase over the years; the others are more
significant reformatting to make eslint happy (that are not otherwise
actually improvements).
The one area that we do not attempt to work on here is the
"switch/case" indentation.
This fixes an issue where with very tall messages (more than about a
screen in height), one would end up scrolled to the bottom of the
message if you clicked on it, which usually felt annoying.
Fixes#8941.
This tweak to our compose on-topic-narrow logic may help make it a bit
easier to do quick replies without needing to re-open compose. I'm
not 100% confident this actually makes Zulip better, but it's worth
testing and getting some feedback.
Fixes#6473.
For a non-empty compose box, we previously considered closing the
compose box when switching topic narrows with content in the compose
box; now we leave it open unconditionally.
Part of #6473.
Fixes#8965.
Mark_message(s)_as_read is used in marking a message as having been
read by the browser, rename it to notify_server_message(s)_read to
avoid any confusion.
If we're entering a topic narrow, and the compose topic is the same as
narrowed topic, then leave the compose box open.
This is important if you open compose in a topic narrow, click on a
narrow, and then use the back button to return to that original
narrow. Before this change, we'd close the compose box for no reason.
Fixes#6510.
@brockwhittaker wrote the original prototype for having
pills in the recipient box when users compose PMs (either
1:1 or huddle). The prototype was test deloyed on our
main realm for several weeks.
This commit includes all the original CSS and HTML from
the prototype.
After some things changed with the codebase after the initial
test deployment, I made the following changes:
* In prior commits I refactored out a module called
`user_pill.js` that implemented some common functions
against a more streamlined version of `input_pill.js`,
and this commit largely integrates with that.
* I made changes in a prior commit to handle Zephyr
semantics (emails don't get validated) and tested
this commit with zephyr.
* I fixed a reload bug by extracting code out to
`compose_pm_pill.js` and re-ordering some
calls to `initialize`.
There are still two flaws related to un-pill-ified text in the
input:
* We could be more aggressive about trying to pill-ify
emails when you blur or tab away.
* We only look at the pills when you send the message,
instead of complaining about the un-pill-ified text.
(Some folks may consider that a feature, but it's
probably surprising to others.)
Use compose_ui.insert_syntax_and_focus() when we need to insert text
inline-ly followed by the focus to compose textarea because it does
this job more smartly(it take cares of spaces).
Steve Howell
Rohitt Vashishtha
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
YashRE42
Vinit Singh
Mohit Gupta
Rishi Gupta
Marco Burstein
Armaan Ahluwalia
Shubham Dhama
Shubham Padia
Balaji2198
Anurag Sharma
Aastha Gupta