The intention was to continue the outer ‘for’ loop, not the inner one
(but Python doesn’t have labelled ‘continue’).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This allows us to revoke MultiUseInvites by changing their .status
instead of deleting them (which has been deleting the helpful tracking
information on PreregistrationUsers about which MultiUseInvite they came
from).
This guarantees that the Realm is always non-None when we hit the
codepath is_static_or_current_realm_url via
do_change_stream_description, so that we can properly skip rewritting
some images.
Fixes#19405
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We followed a same approach as in #22611 to mark migrations as noops. We
might eventually squash them.
Migration operations that only change the validators should be removed
as they are essentially noops that do not affect the database schema.
However, ./manage.py makemigration still generates a new migration for
validators change regardless. So we still have to keep one migration
that updates the validators to the latest state. We prefer to keep the
earliest one for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit adds the OPTIONAL .realm attribute to Message
(and ArchivedMessage), with the server changes for making new Messages
have this set. Old Messages still have to be migrated to backfill this,
before it can be non-nullable.
Appropriate test changes to correctly set .realm for Messages the tests
manually create are included here as well.
zerver/migrations/0240_usermessage_migrate_bigint_id_into_id.py needs
to be updated to account for Django 4.1 creating AutoField as an
identity column rather than a serial column.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The sequence value should reflect the last id, not the next id, to
avoid leaving a gap of 1. Also, it should take ArchivedUserMessage.id
into account to avoid collisions during future archiving.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
SCIMClient is a type-unsafe workaround for django-scim2’s conflation
of SCIM users with Django users. Given that a SCIMClient is not a
UserProfile, it might as well not be a model at all, since it’s only
used to satisfy django-scim2’s request.user.is_authenticated queries.
This doesn’t solve the type safety issue with assigning a SCIMClient
to request.user, nor the performance issue with running the SCIM
middleware on non-SCIM requests. But it reduces the risk of potential
consequences worse than crashing, since there’s no longer a
request.user.id for Django to confuse with the ID of an actual
UserProfile.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We are no longer writing to or reading the UserStatus.status field,
so we delete that from the model.
Fifth step in making user status `away` a deprecated way to access
`presence_enabled` for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
Now that user status updates with `away=True|False` also update the
user's presence_enabled setting, we do a migration so that users with
`UserStatus.status=AWAY` also have the presence_enabled setting as
False (`away=!presence_enabled`).
Second step in making user status away a deprecated way to access
presence_enabled for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
To allow `custom_profile_field` to display in user profile popover,
added new boolean field "display_in_profile_summary" in its model class.
In `custom_profile_fields.py`, functions are edited as per conditions,
like currently we can display max 2 `custom_profile_fields` except
`LONG_TEXT` and `USER` type fields.
Default external account custom profile fields made updatable for only
this new field, as previous they were not updatable.
Fixes part of: #21215
Updates the two UserProfile foreign key fields to have a backward
relation in the MutedUser model by changing the `related_name`
property.
This is a prep commit for removing users with a muted relationship
to the current user from read receipts.
This commit udpates can_remove_subscribers_group to be not null.
We already added a migration to set the value of this field for
existing streams and also added a commit to set this field to
admins system group for now while creating streams.
This migration sets can_remove_subscribers_group value to admins system
group for all the existing streams. In further commit we would change
can_remove_subscribers_group to be not null and thus we add this migration
to ensure all existing streams have this setting value set.
Added a user_list_style personal user setting to the bottom of
Settings > Display settings > Theme section which controls the look
of the right sidebar user list.
The radio button UI includes a preview of what the styles look like.
The setting is intended to eventually have 3 possible values: COMPACT,
WITH_STATUS and WITH_AVATAR; the final value is not yet implemented.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This also allows us to remove some assertions as we now know that
AVATAR_SALT will never be None.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit changes the code to consider zero as an invalid value for
message_content_edit_time_limit_seconds. Now to represent the setting that
user can edit the message anytime, the setting value will be "None" in
database and "unlimited" will be passed to API from clients.
Since validators do not affect the database, this migration is a noop.
Removing the migration fails check-database-compatibility. We might
eventually delete it when Django supports a cleaner method for deletion.
TODO:
Remove the type annotation when django-stubs is integrated.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
There may be some internal realms which were created after applying
"0382_create_role_based_system_groups.py" migration and this migration
is used to create system groups for those realms.
Because Django's ContentType objects are, by default, created lazily
when an actual object is created that will use them, this migration
would fail on any server that actually had RealmReactivationStatus
objects already, and had not yet created the ContentType for them.
ContentType objects are very simple:
zulip=> select * from django_content_type where model = 'realmreactivationstatus';
id | app_label | model
----+-----------+-------------------------
85 | zerver | realmreactivationstatus
So we can simply patch this by using get_or_create.
We now send a new user_topic event while muting and unmuting topics.
fetch_initial_state_data now returns an additional user_topics array to
the client that will maintain the user-topic relationship data.
This will support any future addition of new features to modify the
relationship between a user-topic pair.
This commit adds the relevent backend code and schema for the new
event.
Now that we can assume Python 3.6+, we can use the
email.headerregistry module to replace hacky manual email address
parsing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A user ran into an issue while upgrading where
ContentType.objects.get(model="realmreactivationstatus",
app_label="zerver") fails due to the object being missing. The reason
for that is to be yet figured out, but the immediate solution is clear
in the sense that the migration can just quit early
if not Confirmation.objects.filter(type=REALM_REACTIVATION).exists() and
that'll effectively skip it for almost all servers (because realm
reactivations links are something that's really only useful on Zulip
Cloud).
Fixes#21266.
We want to tie the prereg_user to the MultiUseInvite directly rather
than to the MultiUserInvite's confirmation object, because the latter is
not possible. This is because the flow is that after going through the
multiuse invite link, the PreregistrationUser is created together with a
Confirmation object, creating a confirmation link (via
create_confirmation_link) to which then the user is redirected to finish
account creation. This means that the PreregistrationUser is already
tied to a Confirmation, so that attribute is occupied.
PostgreSQL's `default_statistics_target` is used to track how many
"most common values" ("MCVs") for a column when performing an
`ANALYZE`. For `tsvector` columns, the number of values is actually
10x this number, because each row contains multiple values for the
column[1]. The `default_statistics_target` defaults to 100[2], and
Zulip does not adjust this at the server level.
This translates to 1000 entries in the MCV for tsvectors. For
large tables like `zerver_messages`, a too-small value can cause
mis-planned query plans. The query planner assumes that any
entry *not* found in the MCV list is *half* as likely as the
least-likely value in it. If the table is large, and the MCV list is
too short (as 1000 values is for large deployments), arbitrary
no-in-the-MCV words will often be estimated by the query planner to
occur comparatively quite frequently in the index. Based on this, the
planner will instead choose to scan all messages accessible by the
user, filtering by word in tsvector, instead of using the tsvector
index and filtering by being accessible to the user. This results in
degraded performance for word searching.
However, PostgreSQL allows adjustment of this value on a per-column
basis. Add a migration to adjust the value up to 10k for
`search_tsvector` on `zerver_message`, which results in 100k entries
in that MCV list.
PostgreSQL's documentation says[3]:
> Raising the limit might allow more accurate planner estimates to be
> made, particularly for columns with irregular data distributions, at
> the price of consuming more space in `pg_statistic` and slightly
> more time to compute the estimates.
These costs seem adequate for the utility of having better search.
In the event that the pgroonga backend is in use, these larger index
statistics are simply wasted space and `VACUUM` computational time,
but the costs are likely still reasonable -- even 100k values are
dwarfed by the size of the database needed to generate 100k unique
entries in tsvectors.
[1]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_14_4/src/backend/utils/adt/array_typanalyze.c#L261-L267
[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-DEFAULT-STATISTICS-TARGET
[3]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/planner-stats.html#id-1.5.13.5.3