Commit Graph

124 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
sahil839 6657cddd7a refractor: Move get_visible_email from popovers.js to people.js.
This commit moves the get_visible_email function to people.js
as this function will be used in other places and people.js seems
relevant file for this.

Tests are added to get full coverage.
2020-04-20 20:48:47 -07:00
Rohitt Vashishtha c8b0627ffe zblueslip: Run blueslip.reset after each test.
This simplifies the blueslip interface to just declaring expected
errors and calling the code to test.
2020-04-20 08:17:20 -04:00
Steve Howell e64059de79 node tests: Remove most test_log length assertions.
For all the places where we just make zero or one
blueslip call, asserting for length is either
unnecessary or overkill.
2020-04-08 11:37:27 -04:00
Steve Howell f7b432afec node tests: Auto-include zblueslip for node tests.
We already use blueslip stubs in ~45 tests, so we
may as well just auto-include it.
2020-04-03 12:56:49 -04:00
Steve Howell df84c52a7f zblueslip: Change API to expect/reset.
The `set_test_data` never made complete sense to
me, since it wasn't really data that we were
setting.
2020-04-03 12:56:49 -04:00
Stefan Weil d2fa058cc1
text: Fix some typos (most of them found and fixed by codespell).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
2020-03-27 17:25:56 -07:00
Steve Howell 58b72a2194 refactor: Make bot owner hovers more robust.
This is code simplification motivated
by a recent bug that we fixed with some
server changes, but which was really
caused in some sense by our client code
using an overly finicky
condition to check falsiness.

For cross-realm bots, the value of
`user.bot_owner_id` may be `null`, or it
may simply be `undefined`, depending
on whether the server passes `None`
or simply omits the field.

We don't want out client code to be
coupled to that rather arbitrary
decision.

We were doing a `!== null` check instead
of checking for falsiness, which led to
blueslip errors in the past.  Because a
bot owner id could be plausibly 0, a falsiness
check would be brittle in a different way.

Now we avoid that ugliness by calling
`get_bot_owner_user`, which either returns
an object or `undefined`.

And then the caller can just do a concise
check for whether `bot_owner` exists.

And we also fix up the crufty code that
was putting `bot_owner_full_name` on to
the object instead of using a local.

We have a bug report for this again, although
it might be on an old branch.

Fixes #13621.
2020-03-24 20:40:19 -07:00
Steve Howell f0c99b42ec Rename people.add_in_realm to people.add().
We had this API:

    people.add_in_realm = full-fledged user
    people.add = not necessarily in realm

Now the API is this:

    people.add = full-fledged user
    people._add_user = internal API for cross-realm bots
        and deactivated users

I think in most of our tests the distinction between
people.add() and people.add_in_realm() was just an
accident of history and didn't reflect any real intention.

And if I had to guess the intention in 99% of the cases,
folks probably thought they were just creating ordinary,
active users in the current realm.

In places where the distinction was obviously important
(because a test failed), I deactivated the user via
`people.deactivate`.

For the 'basics' test in the people test suite, I clean
up the test setup for Isaac.  Before this commit I was
adding him first as a non-realm user then as a full-fledged
user, but this was contrived and confusing, and we
didn't really need it for test coverage purposes.
2020-03-22 10:55:11 -07:00
Steve Howell 25d2e2e122 Rename get_realm_persons() to get_realm_users().
The function's name was misleading, since it includes
any bots in your realm.
2020-03-22 10:55:11 -07:00
Steve Howell 7ac5d0602b minor: Rename function to get_active_humans().
Saying `human_persons` is a bit redundant (although
kind of an artifact of our legacy use of `person`
when we really mean `user`.)
2020-03-22 10:55:11 -07:00
Steve Howell 7088d09094 presence/people: Use people.get_active_human_count().
Before this commit, presence used get_realm_count()
to determine whether a realm was "small" (and thus
should show all human users in the buddy list, even
humans that had not been active in a while).

The `get_realm_count` function--despite a very wrong,
misleading comment--was including bots in its count.

The new function truly counts only active humans
(and no bots).

Because we were overcounting users before this change,
we should technically adjust `BIG_REALM_COUNT` down
by some amount to reflect our original intention there
on the parameter.  I'm leaving it alone for now, though,
since we've improved the performance of the buddy list
over time, and it's probably fine if a few "big" realms
get re-classified as small realms (and show more users)
by virtue of this change.

(Also note that this cutoff value only affects the
"normal" view of the buddy list; both small realms
and large realms will show long-inactive users if you
do searches.)

Fixes #14215
2020-03-22 10:55:11 -07:00
Steve Howell 979dcfe85b refactor: Extract settings_data.py.
This extracts a new module with three
functions, which we will test with 100%
line coverage:

    - show_email
    - email_for_user_settings
    - get_time_preferences

The first two break several dependencies
in the codebase on `settings_org.js`.  The
`get_time_preferences` breaks an annoying
dependency on `page_params` within people.

The module is pretty cohesive, in terms that
all three functions are just light wrappers
around `page_params` and/or `settings_config`.

Now all the modules that want to call show_email()
only have to require `settings_data`, instead of
having a dependency on the much heavier
`settings_org.js` module.

I also make some of the unit tests here be more
full-stack, where instead of stubbing show_email,
I basically just toggle `page_params.is_admin`.
2020-02-28 17:11:24 -08:00
Steve Howell b994889315 node tests: Just set i18n every time.
Explicitly stubbing i18n in 48 different files
is mostly busy work at this point, and it doesn't
provide much signal, since often it's invoked
only to satisfy transitive dependencies.
2020-02-28 17:11:24 -08:00
Steve Howell da79fd206a ui_init: Handle page_params more cleanly.
This cleans up the handoff of page_params
data between ui_init and modules that
take over ownership of page_params-derived
data.

Read the long comment in ui_init for a bit
more context.

Most of this diff is actually test cleanup.
And a lot of the diff to "real" code is
just glorified `s/page_params/params/`
in the `initialize` functions.

One little oddity is that we don't actually
surrender ownership of `page_params.user_id`
to `people.js`.  We could plausibly sweep
the rest of the codebase to just use
`people.my_user_id()` consistently, but it's
not a super high priority thing to fix,
since the value never changes.

The stream_data situation is a bit messy,
since we consume `page_params` data in the
initialize() function in addition to the
`params` data we "own".  I added a comment
there and intend to follow up.  I tried
to mostly avoid the "word soup" by extracting
three locals at the top.

Finally, I don't touch `alert_words` yet,
despite it also doing the delete-page-params-data
dance.  The problem is that `alert_words`
doesn't have a proper `initialize()`.  We
should clean that up and have it use a
`Map` internally, too.
2020-02-26 13:14:09 -08:00
Steve Howell d2a62d2055 node tests: Fix dead code in people tests. 2020-02-26 07:19:00 -05:00
Steve Howell e8de4abb0e markdown: Clean up userMentionHandler().
This mostly moves logic into people.js.
The people functions added here are glorified
two-liners.

One thing that changes here is that we
are a bit more rigorous about duplicate
names.

The code is slightly awkward, because this
commit preserves the strange behavior
that if 'alice|42' doesn't match on
the user with the name "alice" and user_id
"42", we instead look for a user whose
name is "alice|42".  That seems like a
misfeature to me, but there's a test for
it, so I want to check with Tim that it's not
intentional behavior before I simplify
the code.
2020-02-18 16:04:12 -08:00
Steve Howell 9ab07d1038 util.js: Remove util from window.
We now treat util like a leaf module and
use "require" to import it everywhere it's used.

An earlier version of this commit moved
util into our "shared" library, but we
decided to wait on that.  Once we're ready
to do that, we should only need to do a
simple search/replace on various
require/zrequire statements plus a small
tweak to one of the custom linter checks.

It turns out we don't really need util.js
for our most immediate code-sharing goal,
which is to reuse our markdown code on
mobile.  There's a little bit of cleanup
still remaining to break the dependency,
but it's minor.

The util module still calls the global
blueslip module in one place, but that
code is about to be removed in the next
few commits.

I am pretty confident that once we start
sharing things like the typeahead code
more aggressively, we'll start having
dependencies on util.  The module is barely
more than 300 lines long, so we'll probably
just move the whole thing into shared
rather than break it apart.  Also, we
can continue to nibble away at the
cruftier parts of the module.
2020-02-15 12:20:20 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 050915c46c js: Convert _.size(a) to a.length.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-02-10 14:08:12 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 4948240619 js: Convert _.filter(a, …) to a.filter(…).
And convert the corresponding function expressions to arrow style
while we’re here.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-02-10 14:08:12 -08:00
Steve Howell e9c6653852 node tests: Always enforce blueslip warn/error/fatal.
We now require all of our unit tests to handle
blueslip errors for warn/error/fatal.  This
simplifies the zblueslip code to not have any
options passed in.

Most of the places changed here fell into two
categories:

    - We were just missing a random piece of
      setup data in a happy path test.

    - We were testing error handling in just
      a lazy way to ensure 100% coverage.  Often
      these error codepaths were fairly
      contrived.

The one place where we especially lazy was
the stream_data tests, and those are now
more thorough.
2020-02-07 14:15:44 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 02511bff1c js: Automatically convert _.each to for…of.
This commit was automatically generated by the following script,
followed by lint --fix and a few small manual lint-related cleanups.

import * as babelParser from "recast/parsers/babel";
import * as recast from "recast";
import * as tsParser from "recast/parsers/typescript";
import { builders as b, namedTypes as n } from "ast-types";
import { Context } from "ast-types/lib/path-visitor";
import K from "ast-types/gen/kinds";
import { NodePath } from "ast-types/lib/node-path";
import assert from "assert";
import fs from "fs";
import path from "path";
import process from "process";

const checkExpression = (node: n.Node): node is K.ExpressionKind =>
  n.Expression.check(node);
const checkStatement = (node: n.Node): node is K.StatementKind =>
  n.Statement.check(node);

for (const file of process.argv.slice(2)) {
  console.log("Parsing", file);
  const ast = recast.parse(fs.readFileSync(file, { encoding: "utf8" }), {
    parser: path.extname(file) === ".ts" ? tsParser : babelParser,
  });
  let changed = false;
  let inLoop = false;
  let replaceReturn = false;

  const visitLoop = (...args: string[]) =>
    function(this: Context, path: NodePath) {
      for (const arg of args) {
        this.visit(path.get(arg));
      }
      const old = { inLoop };
      inLoop = true;
      this.visit(path.get("body"));
      inLoop = old.inLoop;
      return false;
    };

  recast.visit(ast, {
    visitDoWhileStatement: visitLoop("test"),

    visitExpressionStatement(path) {
      const { expression, comments } = path.node;
      let valueOnly;
      if (
        n.CallExpression.check(expression) &&
        n.MemberExpression.check(expression.callee) &&
        !expression.callee.computed &&
        n.Identifier.check(expression.callee.object) &&
        expression.callee.object.name === "_" &&
        n.Identifier.check(expression.callee.property) &&
        ["each", "forEach"].includes(expression.callee.property.name) &&
        [2, 3].includes(expression.arguments.length) &&
        checkExpression(expression.arguments[0]) &&
        (n.FunctionExpression.check(expression.arguments[1]) ||
          n.ArrowFunctionExpression.check(expression.arguments[1])) &&
        [1, 2].includes(expression.arguments[1].params.length) &&
        n.Identifier.check(expression.arguments[1].params[0]) &&
        ((valueOnly = expression.arguments[1].params[1] === undefined) ||
          n.Identifier.check(expression.arguments[1].params[1])) &&
        (expression.arguments[2] === undefined ||
          n.ThisExpression.check(expression.arguments[2]))
      ) {
        const old = { inLoop, replaceReturn };
        inLoop = false;
        replaceReturn = true;
        this.visit(
          path
            .get("expression")
            .get("arguments")
            .get(1)
            .get("body")
        );
        inLoop = old.inLoop;
        replaceReturn = old.replaceReturn;

        const [right, { body, params }] = expression.arguments;
        const loop = b.forOfStatement(
          b.variableDeclaration("let", [
            b.variableDeclarator(
              valueOnly ? params[0] : b.arrayPattern([params[1], params[0]])
            ),
          ]),
          valueOnly
            ? right
            : b.callExpression(
                b.memberExpression(right, b.identifier("entries")),
                []
              ),
          checkStatement(body) ? body : b.expressionStatement(body)
        );
        loop.comments = comments;
        path.replace(loop);
        changed = true;
      }
      this.traverse(path);
    },

    visitForStatement: visitLoop("init", "test", "update"),

    visitForInStatement: visitLoop("left", "right"),

    visitForOfStatement: visitLoop("left", "right"),

    visitFunction(path) {
      this.visit(path.get("params"));
      const old = { replaceReturn };
      replaceReturn = false;
      this.visit(path.get("body"));
      replaceReturn = old.replaceReturn;
      return false;
    },

    visitReturnStatement(path) {
      if (replaceReturn) {
        assert(!inLoop); // could use labeled continue if this ever fires
        const { argument, comments } = path.node;
        if (argument === null) {
          const s = b.continueStatement();
          s.comments = comments;
          path.replace(s);
        } else {
          const s = b.expressionStatement(argument);
          s.comments = comments;
          path.replace(s, b.continueStatement());
        }
        return false;
      }
      this.traverse(path);
    },

    visitWhileStatement: visitLoop("test"),
  });

  if (changed) {
    console.log("Writing", file);
    fs.writeFileSync(file, recast.print(ast).code, { encoding: "utf8" });
  }
}

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-02-07 14:09:47 -08:00
Steve Howell b8f01f9cda people: Rename method to get_by_user_id().
This name is consistent with:

    get_by_email()
    get_by_name()
2020-02-05 12:04:56 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 60fac80c8e dict, lazy_set: Replace num_items method with size property.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-02-04 12:22:03 -08:00
Steve Howell 890a4b1247 refactor: Add filterer for user settings.
This change sets us up to optimize how we
filter users in the admin user settings.
See #13554 for more context on the user
facing issues.

This fix is basically three related things:

    - Add filterer options to list_render.
    - Add helper method to people.js.
    - Use filterer in settings_users.js.
2020-01-14 22:43:08 -08:00
Steve Howell bc5589c2a7 people: Clean up recip.id code.
When we are pulling data from message.display_recipient
for private messages, the user_id field is always
called 'id', not 'user_id', so we can simplify
some defensive code.
2020-01-05 12:27:30 -08:00
Steve Howell 26168eaa98 search: Optimize search bar suggestions for large realms.
We only ever show 3 or 4 people in search suggestions
(possibly w/a couple variations, like pm-with/sender/etc.),
so we can try to search a smaller subset of people
before going through the entire realm.

We use message_store.user_ids() for this, since you
typically want to search messages for people that
have sent messages recently, and we already sort
based on PM conversations.
2020-01-04 12:58:00 -08:00
Steve Howell d87c5d7b1f search: Use people.filter_all_persons() in search.
This should avoid some memory allocations.

We also use build_person_matcher to avoid
repeating the same logic over and over
again to process the query into termlets.

We also remove people.get_all_persons() and
people.person_matches_query().
2020-01-04 12:53:32 -08:00
Steve Howell 7229a943f0 tests: Use add_in_realm for "me" in people tests.
This is more realistic for testing.
2020-01-02 12:03:04 -08:00
Steve Howell 54cb857fee refactor: Rename people.get_rest_of_realm().
We want to mostly deprecate this function (see
the comment I added), so I gave it a more specific
name.

Ideally I'd just fix `stream_create`, but it does
use this function in a couple places, and it's helpful
to reuse the same sort here.  In one place stream_create
actually unshifts the "me" user back to the top of the
list, which makes sense for its use case.
2020-01-02 12:03:04 -08:00
Steve Howell 70470dea1c settings: Use correct email when searching users.
If we aren't showing users emails, then we don't
want to use emails in the search.

And if we are showing users emails, we want to
search on the email that's displayed to them.
For admins this will be delivery_email.

For regular users we arguably shouldn't search
on emails either, since it mostly causes confusion,
but this commit just preserves the current
behavior for those users (unless `show_email` is
false).
2019-12-30 09:43:24 -08:00
Steve Howell 3e4326afda refactor: Extract email_for_user_settings.
We want to be able to unit test this value,
since it's conditional on several factors:

    - am I an admin?
    - can non-admins view emails?
    - do we have delivery_email for the user?

I'm mocking show_email in the tests, since the
show_email code is in `settings_org` and
kind of hard to unit test.  It's not impossible,
but it's too much for this commit.  (Either
we need to extract it out to a nice file or
deal with mocking jQuery.  That module is
mostly data-oriented, so it would be nice
to have something like `settings_config` that
is actually pure data.)
2019-12-28 11:22:24 -08:00
Steve Howell 3a95be2f2f refactor: Extract matches_user_settings_search.
This was duplicate code.  I'm moving it to people
for pragmatic reasons--it's hard to unit test stuff
in settings_users.js due to all the jQuery.

It's also nice to have all people-related search
code in one place, just for auditing purposes.
2019-12-28 11:22:24 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 428956c086 zjsunit: Remove set_global side effect from zrequire.
ES6 and TS modules don’t insert themselves into `window`, so our tests
shouldn’t insert them either.  Since the test `window` behaves like
`global` now, we can rely on legacy modules that do insert themselves
to do it themselves.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2019-11-13 14:29:17 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 28f3dfa284 js: Automatically convert var to let and const in most files.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`.  It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2019-11-03 12:42:39 -08:00
Priyank Patel 73b19672c3 message_fetch: Use user IDs for supported operators.
The approach taken here is basically use user IDs in operator that
support it when sending the request for fetching the messages
(see comments in code for more details).
2019-07-13 11:35:37 -07:00
Hemanth V. Alluri 34db469700 org_settings: Fix error with undefined profile_field in bot settings.
This is a small patch to fix the error message an admin would receive if
they tried to change bot info and owner from the "bots" setting of the
organization settings panel.
2019-04-25 15:56:44 -07:00
Rohitt Vashishtha 5c2e64d6a2 tests: Fix accidental uses of assert() -> assert.equal(). 2019-02-20 10:41:42 -08:00
Hemanth V. Alluri e3aed0f7bc custom profile fields: Markdown rendering for custom profile field values.
This makes it possible it include our standard markdown formatting in
one's custom profile fields, allowing for links, emphasis, emoji, etc.

Fixes #10131.
2019-01-01 21:06:21 -08:00
Hemanth V. Alluri 28d344b4b5 custom profile fields: Pass value as part of a dictionary.
While we're at it, we remove the JSON parsing that was part of the
user field code path, since this function isn't responsible for
rendering user fields.
2019-01-01 21:05:28 -08:00
Yashashvi Dave 53201c5411 statis/js/people.js: Add function `get_user_type`.
Add function `get_user_type`, which returns user
type-"Administrator", "Guest", "Bot" or "Member"
depending on what they are.
2018-11-12 14:57:32 -08:00
Tim Abbott deb29749c2 people: Add a CSS class to label guest users.
This doesn't do anything yet, since we still need to add the actual
CSS, but it should make it easy for someone to just do the design
work.
2018-10-31 10:15:49 -07:00
Steve Howell adf616d3f1 Add pm_perma_link helper. 2018-10-22 12:22:26 -07:00
Rohitt Vashishtha b18f9def06 people.js: Add get_mention_syntax to conditionally get @user|id syntax.
This is intended to replace all function calls for generating mention
syntax for a target user.
2018-10-13 16:42:34 -07:00
Cynthia Lin a11c56f02a people: Format times without leading zeroes. 2018-10-04 17:02:09 -07:00
Rohitt Vashishtha e497816a42 people: Track users with same full names.
This commit exposes the function is_duplicate_full_name()
that can be used to discern if we cannot identify a user
just by their full name in the interface and have to use
his user id as well to distinguish them from other users.
2018-08-31 14:16:47 -07:00
Shubham Dhama 16357fc84a people: Add common function for getting active human users. 2018-07-30 13:48:36 -07:00
Shubham Dhama dcb6254a4e eslint: Enable `no-extra-parens` rule.
Following sub-configuration is disabled:
                "nestedBinaryExpressions": false,
2018-06-11 07:51:24 -04:00
Shubham Padia 0ffcb7fccf search: Remove blueslip warnings for invalid emails in 'pm-with' filter.
Fixes #3380.
The blueslip warning mentioned in #3380 were from paths ending at
people.email_list_to_user_ids_string. Some additional blueslip warnings
were raised after using that function.
Although we can put a validation check somewhere in the call stack of
people.email_list_to_user_ids_string, this function itself is used to
validate the operand by the higher order functions, so it wouldn't make
sense to put a validation check before that. Instead, removing the
blueslip warning altogether was chosen.
people.email_list_to_user_ids_string was replaced by
people.reply_to_to_user_ids_string which is a blueslip-free version
of the same. Other blueslip warnings were removed.
2018-05-30 07:49:59 -04:00
Shubham Padia d9b0ab2ae7 narrow: Show non-existing user message for invalid emails.
Also adds people.is_valid_bulk_emails_for_compose and refactors
narrow_state.set_compose_defaults to use it.
2018-05-28 10:45:42 -07:00
Steve Howell e3b119c010 Add people.safe_full_names. 2018-05-16 09:30:49 -07:00