Change the condition for allowing failed validation to the condition
that `if the test fails, response status code begins with 4`. Also
add `intentionally_undocumented` argument in `validate_request` for
allowing passing of tests which return `200` responses but fail
validation due to some intentionally undocumented feature in
OpenAPI specification.
Added order_by("id") clause in query for RealmAuditLog
for consistent output.
It was causing zerver.tests.test_audit_log.TestRealmAuditLog
to fail due to order mismatch.
Clock time checks lead to tests that nondeterministically fail when
the CI container is super slow, and there's no good reason this test
in particular needs to do that sort of test in addition to our
standard database query count check (which is already does).
Now when you are reading a single test, you can
explicitly see that the event and service handler
are tied to your bot, which is our test bot
for outgoing webhooks.
Decorating an entire test with a mock makes it
hard to ascertain where the actual mock behavior
is expected to happen, plus it clutters up
the parameter list.
In fact, we remove a dubious re-assertion here that
a mock was called. The assertion that a mock was
called was true, but it was misleading to think
the code right before it had invoked the mock.
We also have the caller pass in the property name for an
additional sanity check.
Note that we don't yet handle the possibility of extra_data;
that will be a subsequent commit.
Also, the stream_id fields aren't in Realm.property_types,
so we specify their types in the checker.
This a pretty big commit, but I really wanted it
to be atomic.
All realm_user/update events look the same from
the top:
_check_realm_user_update = check_events_dict(
required_keys=[
("type", equals("realm_user")),
("op", equals("update")),
("person", _check_realm_user_person),
]
)
And then we have a bunch of fields for person that
are optional, and we usually only send user_id plus
one other field, with the exception of avatar-related
events:
_check_realm_user_person = check_dict_only(
required_keys=[
# vertical formatting
("user_id", check_int),
],
optional_keys=[
("avatar_source", check_string),
("avatar_url", check_none_or(check_string)),
("avatar_url_medium", check_none_or(check_string)),
("avatar_version", check_int),
("bot_owner_id", check_int),
("custom_profile_field", _check_custom_profile_field),
("delivery_email", check_string),
("full_name", check_string),
("role", check_int_in(UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES)),
("email", check_string),
("user_id", check_int),
("timezone", check_string),
],
)
I would start the code review by just skimming the changes
to event_schema.py, to get the big picture of the complexity
here. Basically the schema is just the combined superset of
all the individual schemas that we remove from test_events.
Then I would read test_events.py.
The simplest diffs are basically of this form:
- schema_checker = check_events_dict([
- ('type', equals('realm_user')),
- ('op', equals('update')),
- ('person', check_dict_only([
- ('role', check_int_in(UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES)),
- ('user_id', check_int),
- ])),
- ])
# ...
- schema_checker('events[0]', events[0])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], {'role'})
Instead of a custom schema checker, we use the "superset"
schema checker, but then we pass in the set of fields that we
expect to be there. Note that 'user_id' is always there.
So most of the heavy lifting happens in this new function
in event_schema.py:
def check_realm_user_update(
var_name: str, event: Dict[str, Any], optional_fields: Set[str],
) -> None:
_check_realm_user_update(var_name, event)
keys = set(event["person"].keys()) - {"user_id"}
assert optional_fields == keys
But we still do some more custom checks in test_events.py.
custom profile fields: check keys of custom_profile_field
def test_custom_profile_field_data_events(self) -> None:
+ self.assertEqual(
+ events[0]['person']['custom_profile_field'].keys(),
+ {"id", "value", "rendered_value"}
+ )
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], {"custom_profile_field"})
+ self.assertEqual(
+ events[0]['person']['custom_profile_field'].keys(),
+ {"id", "value"}
+ )
avatar fields: check more specific types, since the superset
schema has check_none_or(check_string)
def test_change_avatar_fields(self) -> None:
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], avatar_fields)
+ assert isinstance(events[0]['person']['avatar_url'], str)
+ assert isinstance(events[0]['person']['avatar_url_medium'], str)
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], avatar_fields)
+ self.assertEqual(events[0]['person']['avatar_url'], None)
+ self.assertEqual(events[0]['person']['avatar_url_medium'], None)
Also note that avatar_fields is a set of four fields that
are set in event_schema.
full name: no extra work!
def test_change_full_name(self) -> None:
- schema_checker('events[0]', events[0])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], {'full_name'})
test_change_user_delivery_email_email_address_visibilty_admins:
no extra work for delivery_email
check avatar fields more directly
roles (several examples) -- actually check the specific role
def test_change_realm_authentication_methods(self) -> None:
- schema_checker('events[0]', events[0])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[0]', events[0], {'role'})
+ self.assertEqual(events[0]['person']['role'], role)
bot_owner_id: no extra work!
- change_bot_owner_checker_user('events[1]', events[1])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[1]', events[1], {"bot_owner_id"})
- change_bot_owner_checker_user('events[1]', events[1])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[1]', events[1], {"bot_owner_id"})
- change_bot_owner_checker_user('events[1]', events[1])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[1]', events[1], {"bot_owner_id"})
timezone: no extra work!
- timezone_schema_checker('events[1]', events[1])
+ check_realm_user_update('events[1]', events[1], {"email", "timezone"})
Obviously, this file will soon grow--this
was the easiest way to start without introducing
noise into other commits.
It will soon be structurally similar
to frontend_tests/node_tests/lib/events.js--I
have some ideas there. But this should also
help for things like API docs.
We add the ability to supply optional_keys,
and we don't mutate the list of required
keys that gets passed into us.
We also enforce that there is a "type"
field.
(We will use optional_keys soon.)
This change makes our handling of youtube-url previews consistent
with how we handle our inline images. This allows the previews to
render next to the paragraph that links to the youtube video.
Follow-up to PR #15773.
In particular importing gitter data leads to having accounts with these
noreply github emails. We generally only want users to have emails that
we can actually send messages to, so we'll keep the old behavior of
disallowing sign up with such an email address. However, if an account
of this type already exists, we should allow the user to have access to
it.
This commit rewrites the way addresses are collected. If
the header with the address is not an AddressHeader (for instance,
Delivered-To and Envelope-To), we take its string representation.
Fixes: #15864 ("Error in email_mirror - _UnstructuredHeader has no attribute addresses").
Zulip converts :) to the 1F642 Unicode emoji and promotes the same emoji
in the popular section of the emoji picker.
Previously Zulip has labeled 1F642 as "slight smile". While that name
conforms to the Unicode standard (which describes the code point as
SLIGHTLY SMILING FACE), it didn't match our use case of the emoji.
If a user types :) or selects the first smile in the emoji picker they
probably mean to express a regular "smile" and not a "slight smile",
which raises the question why they are only smiling slightly.
This commit relabels 1F642 as 😄 and our previous 😄 263A as
:smiling_face:. Note that 263A looks different in our three supported
emoji sets, so it is not suited to be our "default smile".
This change does not require a migration since our emoji system stores
both unicode points and names and handles name changes transparently.
ERROR_BOT setting is not None during testing, so running
test_report_error without making errors stream was causing exception.
This commit make a stream name errors thus removes exception and error
log spam caused by it in ./tools/test-backend output.
This commit verify that error logging while testing data export in
test_notify_realm_export_on_failure using assertLogs so that the logs
do not spam test output.
This commit tests if error logs are logged when an error occurs during
testing of check_send_webhook_fixture_message using assertlogs. Using
assertlogs ensure logs are not printed as spam in test output.
This commit verify warning logs while testing validate_api_key and
profile is incoming webhook but is_webhook is not set to True.
Verification is done using assertLogs so that logs does not cause spam
by printing in the test output.
This commit verify error logs printed during testing of log_and report
function using assertLogs without printing it in test output and hence
avoiding spam.
A few major themes here:
- We remove short_name from UserProfile
and add the appropriate migration.
- We remove short_name from various
cache-related lists of fields.
- We allow import tools to continue to
write short_name to their export files,
and then we simply ignore the field
at import time.
- We change functions like do_create_user,
create_user_profile, etc.
- We keep short_name in the /json/bots
API. (It actually gets turned into
an email.)
- We don't modify our LDAP code much
here.
When you post to /json/users, we no longer
require or look at the short_name parameter,
since we don't use it in any meaningful way.
An upcoming commit will eliminate it from the
database.
This fixes up some complex helpers that may
have had some value before f-strings come along,
but they mostly obscured the logic for
people reading the tests.
We still keep really simple helpers for the
common cases, but there are no optional
parameters for them.
One goal of this fix is to remove the
short_name concept, and we just explicitly
set senders everywhere we need them.
We also now have each test just explicitly set
its reaction_type.
For cases where we have custom message ids
or senders, we just inline the simple call
to api_post.
We generally want to avoid having two sibling test
suites depend on each other, unless there's a real
compelling reason to share code. (And if there is
code to share, we can usually promote it to either
test_helpers or ZulipTestCase, as I did here.)
This commit is also prep for the next commit, where
I try to simplify all of the helpers in EmojiReactionBase.
Especially now that we have f-strings, it is usually
better to just call api_post explicitly than to
obscure the mechanism with thin wrappers around
api_post. Our url schemes are pretty stable, so it's
unlikely that the helpers are actually gonna prevent
future busywork.
It's not clear to me why these passed mypy
before, given this:
def assert_realm_values(f: Callable[[Realm], Any], ...
But this is clearly more accurate.
This issue isn't something a system administrator needs to take action
on -- it's a likely minor logic bug around organization
administrators moving topics between streams.
As a result, it shouldn't send error emails to administrators.
This is a hacky fix to avoid spoiler content leaking in emails. The
general idea here is to tell people to open Zulip to view the actual
message in full.
We create a mini-markdown parser here that strips away the fence content
that has the 'spoiler' tag for the text emails.
Our handling of html emails is much better in comparison where we can
use lxml to parse the spoiler blocks.
We include tests for the new implementation to avoid churning the
codebase too much so this can be easily reverted when we are able to
re-enable the feature.
The tests had a bunch of different ways to create
users; now we are consistent. (This is a bit of
a prep step, too, to allow us to easily clean
Hamlet's existing words before each test.)
orientor
Mohit Gupta
palash
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
arpit551
Vishnu KS
Vinit Singh
Mateusz Mandera
Emilio López
Gittenburg
Anders Kaseorg
Rohitt Vashishtha