Now that a customer discount may require a particular plan tier to
be applied, update the billing code to check the plan tier when
getting the customer default_discount field/information for a new
plan.
For billing schedule changes and displaying billing information for
current plans, we explicitly use the discount set on the current,
active plan and do not check the customer object for these actions.
This will be used to set a required plan tier value to be used with
the default discount that is set on the Customer object or with a
fixed price set on a CustomerPlan object.
Also adds `SWITCH_PLAN_TIER_AT_PLAN_END` for `CustomerPlan`
which will be used to mark status of remote server legacy
plans which are scheduled for an upgrade.
Since Customer already stores the realm it is linked to and
customer is always created to store sponsorship request, we directly
use customer to link to the sponsorship data for the realm.
Renames CustomerPlan.SWITCH_NOW_FROM_STANDARD_TO_PLUS to be more
generic, CustomerPlan.SWITCH_PLAN_TIER_NOW.
Because the plan tier change is immediate, moves the code to end
the current plan with the old tier and create the new plan with
the new tier from `make_end_of_cycle_updates_if_needed` to instead
be in a separate helper function, `switch_plan_tier`.
If the update / add card session is successful, return user to
manual license management page if user was on it before clicking
the add / update card button.
These new models are incomplete and totally untested, but merging this
will provide valuable scaffolding for doing smaller PRs working on
individual gaps, and reveals a clear set of TODOs/refactoring/model
changes needed to support where want to end up.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
The Django convention is for __repr__ to include the type and __str__
to omit it. In fact its default __repr__ implementation for models
automatically adds a type prefix to __str__, which has resulted in the
type being duplicated:
>>> UserProfile.objects.first()
<UserProfile: <UserProfile: emailgateway@zulip.com <Realm: zulipinternal 1>>>
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
With django-stubs, these explicit copies of Django’s implicit id
fields are no longer needed for type checking. An exception is the
BigAutoField AbstractUserMessage.id, which is left alone.
This reverts commit c08ee904d8 (#15641).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Previously, we type the model fields with explicit type annotations
manually with the approximate types. This was because the lack of types
for Django.
django-stubs provides more specific types for all these fields that
incompatible with our previous approximate annotations. So now we can
remove the inline type annotations and rely on the types defined in the
stubs. This allows mypy to infer the types of the model fields for us.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We ran into a bug in production caused by two issues:
- Some users came from orgs that didn't have a website and since
the URL field was required, they submitted invalid URLs.
- We didn't properly respond to invalid form submissions, which
led to UnboundLocalError exceptions in another part of the
code.
This commit solves this by doing the following:
- We now allow blank URLs and have a convenient placeholder text
label that tells users that they may leave the URL field blank.
- This commit refactors the code such that invalid form submissions
result in an informative error message about what exactly went
wrong.
We are starting to run into situations where this data could be
quite useful for making future decisions, so it makes to store it
in the database, not just in an email.
This also fixes a bug in void_all_open_invoices function. If a realm
with a local Customer object but without an associated stripe.Customer
is passed to void_all_open_invoices, then the function will end up
voiding the last 10 invoices created by billing system instead of voiding
no invoices at all. This is because stripe.Invoice.list(customer=None)
return last 10 invoices across all customers.
But this bug won't cauuse any issue in production since
void_all_open_invoices can be only invoked from /support page. And we
show the option to void invoices in support page only if the realm
has a paid plan. And it's not really possible for a realm to have
a paid plan without having an associated stripe_customer_id. Plus I
went through the void events in stripe stream since the PR to add
void invoices was merged and there does not seems to be any suspicious
events.
Lauryn Menard
Prakhar Pratyush
Aman Agrawal
Karl Stolley
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
Zixuan James Li
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu KS
PIG208