We were incorrectly reporting active bots as non-active in
popovers, and we had no test coverage for cross-realm bots.
We also rename the function to is_active_user_for_popover,
since the old name, realm_user_is_active_human_or_bot, suggested
the wrong semantics for cross-realm bots.
Last but not least, we only do a blueslip warning if a user id
is not found. When lookups fail, we are pretty confident that
the user is not active, so an error is overkill. We can change
that as part of issue #7120.
Fixes#7153
Wherever possible, we always want to move checking for error
conditions to the views code, so that we don't need to worry about
handling failures with (in this case) a user that's half-created
because a DefaultStreamGroup doesn't exist.
This effectively implements the feature of default stream groups,
except for a UI, nice styling, etc.
Note that we're careful to not have this do anything in an
organization that doesn't have any default stream groups.
This adds two constraints to the image:
1. The `max-width` can not be more than 500px (which prevents it
from being to vertically tall.
2. The `display` is set to `none` below 1024px because the image is
too small at that point to be legible.
This has exactly the same behavior so long as self.subdomain contains
no colon character, ':'; and of course we don't allow those in
subdomains, because they aren't allowed by DNS.
These are just instances that jumped out at me while working on the
subdomains code, mostly while grepping for get_subdomain call sites.
I haven't attempted a comprehensive search, and there are likely
still others left.
I'd much rather see something like
if (thing_is_permissible(user, thing)
or (user_possesses_hammer(user)
and glass_break_requested(thing))):
than
if (thing_is_permissible(user, thing) or
(user_possesses_hammer(user) and
glass_break_requested(thing))):
because the former makes the overall logic much easier to scan.
Similarly for a formula full of arithmetic rather than Boolean
operators. And the actual PEP 8 agrees (though until 2016 it
unfortunately had the opposite advice.)
The upstream linter still applies the backward rule, so disable that.
Now that the old `check_subdomain` has no callers except in
implementing the new, improved interface `user_matches_subdomain`,
inline it into that. Also simplify the Boolean logic a bit.
Now that every call site of check_subdomain produces its second
argument in exactly the same way, push that shared bit of logic
into a new wrapper for check_subdomain.
Also give that new function a name that says more specifically what
it's checking -- which I think is easier to articulate for this
interface than for that of check_subdomain.
This should be a pure refactor: the only asymmetry in the behavior
of `check_subdomain` between its two arguments is if one of them
is None, and in this case we have a non-nullable model field on
one side and the return value from `get_subdomain` on the other.
With these swapped, this call site now matches all other
`check_subdomain` call sites in having the second argument come as
the subdomain of some user's realm.
The type of get_subdomain's parameter is non-Optional, and
in fact if passed an argument of None it would promptly
blow up. So this `getattr` can't be serving any purpose.
It's easier to unit test logic inside of people.js than compose.js.
We allow users to compose emails to any of our cross-realm bots.
Someday we may tighten up which cross-realm bots are valid targets,
since it's not necessarily the case that those bots do anything
useful when you send them messages.
This dictionary includes bots, so the reference to
"people" in the name `realm_people_dict` was misleading.
We omit `realm` for brevity sake--it's usually the case
that folks implementing new features can safely ignore
cross-realm bots, and it's on our roadmap to move those
bots into the realm.
The function name `get_realm_human_user_ids` was a lie--it
includes active bots as well.
The only user of this function is `activity.js`, which wasn't
impacted by the misleading name, because we eventually filter
out bots in the `info_for` function.
It's possible that we actually want to include bots in the right
sidebar, since they can be difficult to discover in other parts
of the UI. Or, if we want to keep the right sidebar as all
human users, we may eventually want to make the logic to exclude
bots happen higher in the stack (but for real, this time).
This changes some text that would display gray when on a blue body
text page; we considered changing the opacity instead, but probably we
should just delete this..
This changes the <ul> styling so that when not nested in a <p>
tag it'll have the standard font-weight (400) and be the same
color as the body text (blue/gray).
Adds support to add "Embedded bot" Service objects. This service
handles every embedded bot.
Extracted from "Embedded bots: Add support to add embedded bots from
UI" by Robert Honig.
Tweaked by tabbott to be disabled by default.
This fixes an exception occurring when engaging an embedded
bot in a PM, makes it respond as itself instead of the sender,
and makes it respond to the PM conversation it is engaded in.
This removes the old blue styled outline around the PM recipient
box that was part of the older bootstrap styling in favor of the
dark outline on :focus that had been implemented for the rest of
the recipient boxes recently.
This creates a dropdown in place of the normal register/login links
you get when logged out, with an option to go to the app or log out if
that appears you click on the avatar.
A bit more work is needed to make this look really good, but it's a
great start.
derAnfaenger
Brock Whittaker
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Vishnu Ks
Sumana Harihareswara
Greg Price
Henrik Pettersson
Abhijeet Kaur
darshanime