Adds a new onboarding email `onboarding_team_to_zulip` for the user
who created the new Zulip organization.
Co-authored by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Adds a new welcome email, `onboarding_zulip_guide`, to be sent four
days after a new user registers with a Zulip organization if the
organization has specified a particular organization type that has
a guide in the corporate `/for/.../` pages. If there is no guide,
then no email is scheduled or sent.
The current `for/communities/` page is not very useful for users
who are not organization administrators, so these onboarding guide
emails are further restricted for those organization types to
only go to new users who are invited/registered as admins for the
organzation.
Adds two database queries for new user registrations: one to get
the organization's type and one to create the scheduled email.
Adds two email logs because the email is sent both to a new user
who registers with an existing organization and to the organization
owner when they register a new organization.
Co-authored by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Previously if `test_forward_address_details` failed, the file
created when setting the `forward_address` may not have been
removed, which would then cause an `EmailNotDeliveredException`
to be raised when then creating a new user in the dev environment.
Wraps the test in a try block, with a finally block for the call
to remove the file.
Previously, this command would reliably fail:
```
tools/test-backend --skip-provision-check --parallel=3
zerver.tests.test_email_log.EmailLogTest.test_forward_address_details
zerver.tests.test_email_log.EmailLogTest.test_generate_and_clear_email_log
zerver.tests.test_example.TestDevelopmentEmailsLog
```
and now it reliably succeeds. :-)
After hours of fiddling/googling/hair-tearing, I found that
mocking-away Django Connection.send_messages() was the best:
- We're testing Zulip and not Django.
- Mocking at this lower level exercises more of our code.
- EmailLogBackEnd._do_send_messages() helper method added to simplify mocking.
Fixes#21925.
EmailLogBackend used to create a new EmailMessage and copy
only certain values from the original EmailMultiAlternatives
object. This resulted in the loss of information and made
it harder to test PRs like
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/17121.
So instead of creating a new EmailMessage, tweak and send the existing
EmailMultiAlternatives object.
This commit removes mock.patch with assertLogs().
* Adds return value to do_rest_call() in outgoing_webhook.py, to
support asserting log output in test_outgoing_webhook_system.py.
* Logs are not asserted in test_realm.py because it would require to users
to be queried using users=User.objects.filter(realm=realm) and the order
of resulting queryset varies for each run.
* In test_decorators.py, replacement of mock.patch is not done because
I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to replace it as it's a return
value of a function.
Tweaked by tabbott to set proper mypy types.
Our test-backend validation confirms that we don't log anything to
stdout in the tests, so the fact that CI passes with this removes
shows there was nothing being logged.
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
mock is just a backport of the standard library’s unittest.mock now.
The SAMLAuthBackendTest change is needed because
MagicMock.call_args.args wasn’t introduced until Python
3.8 (https://bugs.python.org/issue21269).
The PROVISION_VERSION bump is skipped because mock is still an
indirect dev requirement via moto.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Lauryn Menard
Adam Sah
Anders Kaseorg
Vishnu KS
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
rht