This commit has the following changes -
- Adds dropdown for changing create_web_public_stream_policy and this
dropdown is visible only if settings.WEB_PUBLIC_STREAMS_ENABLED and
enable_spectator_access is set to True. This dropdown is live-udpated
on changing enable_spectator_access setting.
- The web-public stream option in stream creation form and stream privacy
modal is hidden if one of settings.WEB_PUBLIC_STREAMS_ENABLED or
enable_spectator_access is set to False except in stream privacy modal
when the stream is already web-public so that the user is not confused by
none of the options being selected.
- We disable the web-public stream option in stream creation form and
in stream-privacy modals of stream which are not already web-public
when the user is not allowed to create web-public streams as per
create_web_public_stream_policy setting.
- We use on_show parameter to hide or disable the options in stream-privacy
modal because we use the visible property of element to remove the bottom
border from last element in the stream-privacy choices and thus we have
to wait for the modal to be visible.
Fixes#20287. Fixes#20296.
We restrict access of messages from web public streams if
anonymous login is disabled via `enable_spectator_access`.
Display of `Anonymous login` button is now controlled by
the value of `enable_spectator_access`.
Admins can toggle `enable_spectator_access` via org settings in UI.
Users wanted a feature where they could specify
which users can create public streams and which users can
create private streams.
This splits stream creation code into two parts,
public and private stream creation.
Fixes#17009.
This commit replaces 'allow_message_deleting' boolean setting
with an integer setting 'delete_own_message_policy'. We have a
separate dropdown now for deciding which user-roles can delete
messages sent by themselves and the time-limit setting droddown
is different.
This new setting has two options - everyone and admins only. Other
options including moderators will be added further.
We also remove the "Never" option from the original time-limit
dropdown, as admins are always allowed to delete message. This
never option resembled the case of only admins being allowed to
delete but this state is now resembled by setting the dropdown
to "admins only" and we also disable the time-limit dropdown in
this case as admins are allowed to delete irrespective of limit.
Note, this setting is only for deleting messages sent by the
deleting user themselves, and only admins are allowed to delete
messages sent by others as before.
This commit replaces boolean field add_emoji_by_admins_only with an
integer field add_custom_emoji_policy as we would also add full members
and moderators option for this setting in further commits.
This commit replaces the allow_community_topic_editing boolean with
integer field edit_topic_policy and includes both frontend and
backend changes.
We also update settings_ui.disable_sub_settings_onchange to not
change the color of label as we did previously when the setting
was a checkbox. But now as the setting is dropdown we keep the
label as it is and we don't do anything with label when disabling
dropdowns. Also, this function was used only here so we can safely
change this.
This commit divides the user_invite_restriction setting dropdown to
a checkbox and a dropdown.
The checkbox is used for 'realm_invite_required' setting and dropdown
for 'realm_invite_to_realm_policy'.
This separation of UI elements is fine as these two settings are
separate in database also and also helps in removing excess if-else
conditions and switch cases.
The message-editing section of settings is moved from "Organization
Settings" to "Organization Permissions", which feels like a more
natural place for these settings.
This commit adds the dropdown in 'Stream settings' section of organization
permissions page to control who can move messages between streams and
also hides the stream-edit UI in message-edit form accordingly.
Fixes#14499.
This commit adds 'admins and moderators' option in frontend for
invite_to_realm_policy.
The logic for moderator for checking whether user is allowed to invite
others or not was added in previous commit as we use common helper
user_has_permission for all policies.
But the test user_can_invite_others_to_relam is updated for including
moderator role in this commit.
This commit replaces different objects - create_stream_policy_values,
invite_to_realm_policy_values and invite_to_stream_policy_values,
with a single object common_policy_values.
Though invite_to_realm_policy do not use other fields of objects like
description, order, etc. but we can keep it as it is for now as we
would separate this setting from "Are invitations required...."
dropdown and these fields will be used then.
This is a prep commit for commits that will add helper functions in
settings_data for these policies replacing the usage of page_params
object.
There are actually two dropdowns for wildcard mention setting,
which would have been added mistakenly while changing the label
and position during merging the original commit for adding this
setting.
This commit removes the extra dropdown dropdown in Other
Permissions subsection and retains the one in Stream
Permissions subsection.
As a consequence of too many options in the bottom `Other permissions`
subsection, the `Save` button could end up too far up from the bottom,
such that it might appear offscreen on low-height laptops.
We fix this by reorganizing the settings in a way that is both more
intuitive and also ensures that none of the subsections are too tall.
Fixes: #14274.
This change is in series of de-duplication of code in "Other permission"
section for various dropdowns.
Here rather than using "by_anyone" and "disabled" for the `value` attribute
of options, we use actual numeric values. As a result, we don't need to
manually handle to extract the data to be sent to the backend on saving.
This change is in series of de-duplication of code in "Other permission"
section for various dropdowns.
Here rather than using "by_admins_only" and "by_admins_only" for `value`
attribute of options, we use actual numeric values. This helps in
de-duplicating lot of code which is vulnerable to bugs.
For few settings like `waiting_period_threshold` it makes sense to have the
"value" attribute of option to have a value other than the actual setting
value because multiple settings are depending upon this dropdown, so
handling them in JS code makes more sense. But for many settings (which has
integer values), we have followed a wrong trend over the time of
representing every new dropdown with human-readable values and manually
handling them in JS Code, where it makes more sense to use actual setting
value. The result of which is code has become less concise, sensible and
less likely to be mistaken.
This is a preliminary commit for upcoming change where we will use
"bot_creation_policy_values" like approach for many other settings where
dropdown represents the only single setting of integer type.
This experimental setting disables sending private messages in Zulip
in a crude way (i.e. users get an error when they try to send one).
It makes no effort to adjust the UI to avoid advertising the idea of
sending private messages.
Fixes#6617.
Sahil Batra
Aman Agrawal
Alex Dehnert
Ganesh Pawar
sahil839
Pragati Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Siddharth Varshney
Matheus Melo
Anders Kaseorg