This commit alone breaks things, needs to be merged with the follow-up
ones.
welcome-bot is removed from the explicit list, because it already is in
settings.INTERNAL_BOTS.
Django’s default FileSystemFinder disallows STATICFILES_DIRS from
containing STATIC_ROOT (by raising an ImproperlyConfigured exception),
because STATIC_ROOT is supposed to be the result of collecting all the
static files in the project, not one of the potentially many sources
of static files.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We rename the send_messages function to generate_and_messages, and
factor out the actual sending part of it into a separate function, which
now gets the name send_messages().
Sending messages one-by-one is significantly slower compared to taking
advantage of the batch-handling code in do_send_messages, so we pass all
the messages to the function in one go. This is memory-hungry if there's
a lot of messages, so we will allow splitting into smaller batches in
the next commit.
The code generating pub_dates for messages would fail to distribute them
across days if tot_messages was too large.
We refactor this code as a separate function (for clarity and to unit
test for the bug we're fixing), and change the structure and naming to a
form that more clearly describes what's happening. We also shift away
from the approach of all the float-to-int conversions as this is in
general tricky and bug prone - django's timedelta() handles floats as
arguments, so we take advantage of that.
Add new custom profile field type, External account.
External account field links user's social media
profile with account. e.g. GitHub, Twitter, etc.
Fixes part of #12302
Rename URL type custom profile field in populate db to avoid confusion
with the "GitHub profile" custom external account profile field we'll
be adding shortly.
This provides a clean warning and 40x error, rather than a 500, for
this corner case which is very likely user error.
The test here is awkward because we have to work around
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/12362.
The hope is that by having a shorter list of initial streams, it'll
avoid some potential confusion confusion about the value of topics.
At the very least, having 5 streams each with 1 topic was not a good
way to introduce Zulip.
This commit minimizes changes to the message content in
`send_initial_realm_messages` to keep the diff readable. Future commits will
reshape the content.
For internal stream messages, most of the time, we have access to
a Stream object. For the few corner cases where we don't, it is a
much cleaner approach to have a separate function that accepts a
stream name than having one multi-option helper that accepts both
names and objects.
If the caller has access to a Stream object, it is wasteful to
query a database for a stream by ID or name. In addition, not
having to go through stream names eliminates various classes of
possible bugs involved with getting a Stream object back.
This adds a new API for sending basic analytics data (number of users,
number of messages sent) from a Zulip server to the Zulip Cloud
central analytics database, which will make it possible for servers to
elect to have their usage numbers counted in published stats on the
size of the Zulip ecosystem.
A key part of this is the new helper, get_user_by_delivery_email. Its
verbose name is important for clarity; it should help avoid blind
copy-pasting of get_user (which we'll also want to rename).
Unfortunately, it requires detailed understanding of the context to
figure out which one to use; each is used in about half of call sites.
Another important note is that this PR doesn't migrate get_user calls
in the tests except where not doing so would cause the tests to fail.
This probably deserves a follow-up refactor to avoid bugs here.
This fixes a lot of spammy output of the form:
2018-11-27 17:46:48.279 INFO [zerver.lib.push_notifications] Sending push notification to user 46
when running populate_db, which is both confusing (since we're not
actually sending push notifications here) and spammy.
Now that we allow multiple users to have registered the same token, we
need to configure calls to unregister tokens to only query the
targeted user_id.
We conveniently were already passing the `user_id` into the push
notification bouncer for the remove API, so no migration for older
Zulip servers is required.
Previously, Zulip did not correctly handle the case of a mobile device
being registered with a push device token being registered for
multiple accounts on the same server (which is a common case on
zulipchat.com). This was because our database `unique` and
`unique_together` indexes incorrectly enforced the token being unique
on a given server, rather than unique for a given user_id.
We fix this gap, and at the same time remove unnecessary (and
incorrectly racey) logic deleting and recreating the tokens in the
appropriate tables.
There's still an open mobile app bug causing repeated re-registrations
in a loop, but this should fix the fact that the relevant mobile bug
causes the server to 500.
Follow-up work that may be of value includes:
* Removing `ios_app_id`, which may not have much purpose.
* Renaming `last_updated` to `data_created`, since that's what it is now.
But none of those are critical to solving the actual bug here.
Fixes#8841.
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Wyatt Hoodes
Yashashvi Dave
Vaibhav
Tim Abbott
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Vishnu Ks
Rishi Gupta
Eeshan Garg
Greg Price
Anders Kaseorg