I think it makes more sense to first tell the user that
the character you are entering is invalid than telling
minimum length requirement is not satisfied.
Fixes#3058.
As we migrate to allow reuse of the same email with multiple realms,
we need to replace the old "no email reuse" validators. Because
stealing the email for a system bot would be problematic, we still ban
doing so.
This commit only affects the realm creation logic, not registering an
account in an existing realm.
In two factor authentication every step adds a unique prefix to the fields,
due to this the name of the form fields differs from the HTML fields. If
we do not do this we will have to change the name in the HTML, which
will cause the change in tests.
This is checked for in the caller of OurAuthenticationForm, which
meant this code was never run. But it is worth having an assertion
here to catch any possible regressions.
Structurally, the main change here is replacing the `clean_username`
function, which would get called when one accessed
self.cleaned_data['username'] with code in the main `clean` function.
This is important because only in `clean` do we have access to the
`realm` object.
Since I recently added full test coverage on this form, we know each
of the major cases have a test; the error messages are unchanged.
The installation admin is not the right person to get support requests from
deactivated users, regardless of the situation.
Also updates the wording to be a bit more concise.
This was basically rewritten by tabbott, because the code is a lot
cleaner after just rewriting the ZulipPasswordResetForm code to no
longer copy the model of the original Django version.
Fixes#4733.
Now that every call site of check_subdomain produces its second
argument in exactly the same way, push that shared bit of logic
into a new wrapper for check_subdomain.
Also give that new function a name that says more specifically what
it's checking -- which I think is easier to articulate for this
interface than for that of check_subdomain.
This should be a pure refactor: the only asymmetry in the behavior
of `check_subdomain` between its two arguments is if one of them
is None, and in this case we have a non-nullable model field on
one side and the return value from `get_subdomain` on the other.
With these swapped, this call site now matches all other
`check_subdomain` call sites in having the second argument come as
the subdomain of some user's realm.
The type of get_subdomain's parameter is non-Optional, and
in fact if passed an argument of None it would promptly
blow up. So this `getattr` can't be serving any purpose.
We're going to end up deleting most of this in the next few commits;
the main goal here is to make it easy to code-review whether we're
breaking anything in replacing the built-in Django form's logic.
Historically, we'd just use the default Django version of this
function. However, since we did the big subdomains migration, it's
now the case that we have to pass in the subdomain to authenticate
(i.e. there's no longer a fallback to just looking up the user by
email).
This fixes a problem with user creation in an LDAP realm, because
previously, the user creation flow would just pass in the username and
password (after validating the subdomain).
This modifies the realm creation form to (1) support a
realm_in_root_domain flag and (2) clearly check whether the root
domain is available inside check_subdomain_available before trying to
create a realm with it; this should avoid IntegrityErrors.
We were doing an unnecessary database query on every user registration
checking the availability of the user's subdomain, when in fact this
is only required for realm creation.
The whole thing is an error, so "message" is a more apt word for the
error message specifically. We abbreviate that as `msg` in the actual
HTTP responses and in the signatures of `json_error` and friends, so
do the same here.
Aditya Bansal
Preston Hansen
Tim Abbott
Vishnu Ks
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Umair Khan
rht
greysome
Rishi Gupta
Greg Price
Vishnu Ks
Greg Price
Jack Zhang