ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This also fixes trying to cancel a resend of a
local message.
The problem were was type confusion between
strings and ints.
The function in `rows.js` may feel like overkill,
but I really want to enforce type safety here,
as we usually treat message ids as floats, but
for the local-echo case we're gonna get
strings. I put it in `rows` because we mostly
do a good job of encapsulating the "zid" role
in the DOM there.
By going directly to the DOM here, we avoid
parsing a string to a float and then converting
it right back to a string, which always make
me queasy about float rounding, so one less
moving part.
When we tried to copy/paste multiple rows up to
and including the last row in our view, we'd have
a blueslip error when the `for` loop checked the
condition `rows.id(row) <= ...` after we had
called `row = rows.next_visible(row)` on the last
row. Basically, `rows.id()` would complain
about a non-existent row.
Now we extract that code into `visible_range`, so
that our `while` loop can exit as soon as we found
the last row in the range.
If folks use an overly broad selector for message rows,
they will accidentally include drafts from the drafts
dialog, which won't have zids. More specific selectors
will be more efficient and possibly prevent strange
behaviors.
For testing convenience, we extract the message.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
This commit prepares the frontend code to be consumed by webpack.
It is a hack: In theory, modules should be declaring and importing the
modules they depend on and the globals they expose directly.
However, that requires significant per-module work, which we don't
really want to block moving our toolchain to webpack on.
So we expose the modules by setting window.varName = varName; as
needed in the js files.
Now that we no longer use tables for our message list, we can
more logically group messages together.
(imported from commit 9923a092f91a45fe3ef06f2f00e23e4e3fb62a37)
This experiment has been disabled for everyone for a while: if we
bring something like this back, it is not likely to be exactly the same,
and will be different enough to require a different implementation.
As it is, the summarization code was making a few code paths (rendering
especially) more complex, and is worth removing for simplicity's sake.
(imported from commit 6ac8cdc9f7077a5a1da01ab4268aba3db0bc43f8)
Previously, narrowing would only work from recipient rows, not
other message table rows (e.g. summary rows). This led to the trap
that you could add a narrows_by_recipient class to an element,
expect that narrowing would work, but the actual handler would
break or silently fail if it weren't part of a recipient row.
Now the click handler looks for the closest table row (tr). It's
encapsulated in rows.get_closest_row(), so if we go to a
non-table-based design, it should be easy to address in one
place.
(imported from commit e116b7573c4bb06599ced84a0adcf8dc23d63593)