We now show before/after, and we don't complicate
our other test that runs in a big loop.
And we take advantage of function injection to
not have to hack into the "real" emoji_codes
structure.
Note that we're simulating the missing emojis
at a slightly higher level, but we already had test
coverage that emoji.get_emoji_name returns
undefined for unknown codepoints.
The main thing here is that we check that the
actual data got put into our data structures.
(In general we want to move away from stubbing
data modules; any place where we stub data modules
is a relic of earlier days, where we were just
trying to set the bar for 100% line coverage,
even though some of the original coverage was
quite shallow.)
I also use real stubs instead of noops for
the calls out to UI-oriented modules.
In passing I tweak some comments in the actual
dispatch code.
With update_emojis, it is pretty easy
to set up the tests with reasonable
data without reaching into internal
data structures.
Also, we can begin the process of
sharing the same data with our
dispatch tests (upcoming).
There was only one place where we weren't
overriding a function, and the use case there
was fairly unique.
Knowing that we're dealing with only functions
will simplify override and allow us to add
features like detecting spurious stubs.
This forces us to more explicitly document at the
top of the file what dependencies we are stubbing,
plus it's less magical.
Also, we may want to do occasional audits of
set_global to clean up places where we mock
things like stream_data, which are probably just
easier to use the real version of now that we
have cleaner APIs to set up stream data.
The modules most affected by this change are our
dispatch-oriented tests--basically, all the
modules that test handling of Zulip events
plus hotkey.js.
$.fn.typeahead, on the other hand, returns the jQuery object back (not
the Typeahead object, which also happens to have a select method), so
this should be converted.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Zulip converts :) to the 1F642 Unicode emoji and promotes the same emoji
in the popular section of the emoji picker.
Previously Zulip has labeled 1F642 as "slight smile". While that name
conforms to the Unicode standard (which describes the code point as
SLIGHTLY SMILING FACE), it didn't match our use case of the emoji.
If a user types :) or selects the first smile in the emoji picker they
probably mean to express a regular "smile" and not a "slight smile",
which raises the question why they are only smiling slightly.
This commit relabels 1F642 as 😄 and our previous 😄 263A as
:smiling_face:. Note that 263A looks different in our three supported
emoji sets, so it is not suited to be our "default smile".
This change does not require a migration since our emoji system stores
both unicode points and names and handles name changes transparently.
Previously, image upload widget delete button CSS class name was
`settings-page-delete-button`.
We can change the CSS class name to `image-delete-button`
so that the name can be more generic.
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Gittenburg
jagansivam28
Tim Abbott