Add `max_int_size` parameter to `to_non_negative_int()` in
decorator.py so it will be able to validate that the integer doesn't
exceed the integer maximum limit.
Fixes#11451
This is important for situations such as with our Zapier app,
where the requesting user may be a bot that would like to access
its owner's subscriptions.
Tweaked by tabbott to eliminate the 2^N growth of cases in
do_get_streams.
We want to use the baseline features of bugdown, but not fancy things
like inline URL previews, since the whole structure of stream
descriptions is to have a single-line thing supporting some
formatting.
The migration part of this change fixes a bug encountered by some
organizations upgrading from older versions of Zulip.
This allows us to have some features using bugdown rendering where
inline image previews will not be rendered (which would be problematic
for e.g. stream descriptions).
Guest users will just get an empty list of default streams; we also
hide the "Default streams" organization view from the guest users UI.
This is for consistency with not providing guest users the full list
of streams in an organization.
Fixing this involves fixing the backend to handle unchanged field
submissions of the Zoom credentials without trying to re-validate the
credentials (for performance) as well as to fetch the already-sent
secret.
We'll use this in the push-notifications code, in a context where
there should definitely already be UserMessage rows if everything's
gone normally... but explicitly checking at the top seems like the
right pattern from a secure-coding perspective.
When a bunch of messages with active notifications are all read at
once -- e.g. by the user choosing to mark all messages, or all in a
stream, as read, or just scrolling quickly through a PM conversation
-- there can be a large batch of this information to convey. Doing it
in a single GCM/FCM message is better for server congestion, and for
the device's battery.
The corresponding client-side logic is in zulip/zulip-mobile#3343 .
Existing clients today only understand one message ID at a time; so
accommodate them by sending individual GCM/FCM messages up to an
arbitrary threshold, with the rest only as a batch.
Also add an explicit test for this logic. The existing tests
that happen to cause this function to run don't exercise the
last condition, so without a new test `--coverage` complains.
Adblock Plus's "Block social media icons tracking" setting blocked
integration logos for social media platforms from loading, so the logos
are renamed to bypass this.
Fixes#11590.
This change should help people discover to distinguish
silent mentions in text as a part of Zulip syntax while
differentiating them from regular mentions.
This optimizes test-backend by skipping webhook
tests when run in default mode.
Tweaked by tabbott to extend the documentation and update the CI
commands.
ACCOUNT_ACTIVATION_DAYS doesn't seems to be used anywhere.
INVITATION_LINK_VALIDITY_DAYS seems to do it's job currently.
(It was only ever used in very early Zulip commits).
We were using a hardcoded relative path, which doesn't work if you're
not running this from the root of the Zulip checkout.
As part of fixing this, we need to make `LOCAL_UPLOADS_DIR` an
absolute path.
Fixes#11581.
Since da8f4bc0e back in August, this control flow has caused
`flags.active_mobile_push_notification` to be cleared if we don't send
these `remove` messages at all, and if we send them directly to GCM...
but not if we send them via the Zulip notification bouncer.
As a result, on a server configured to send `remove` notification-messages
via the bouncer, we accumulate "active" messages and never clear them.
If the user then does `mark_all_as_read`, we end up sending a `remove`
for each of those messages again, and all in one giant burst. We've
seen puzzling bursts of hundreds of removals pass through the bouncer
since turning on removals on chat.zulip.org; it's likely many of them
are caused by this bug.
This issue was made more acute with f4478aad5, which unconditionally
enabled removals.
Test added by tabbott.
This is the only server-side change required for the FCM migration!
Optionally, at some point in the future we might choose to migrate
to the new ("v1") API which FCM also offers. Nothing revolutionary
but there are some nice things about it:
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/migrate-v1
The client-side fix to make these not a problem was in release
16.2.96, of 2018-08-22. We've been sending them from the
development community server chat.zulip.org since 2018-11-29.
We started forcing clients to upgrade with commit fb7bfbe9a,
deployed 2018-12-05 to zulipchat.com.
(The mobile app unconditionally makes a request to a route on
zulipchat.com to check for this kind of forced upgrade, so that
applies to mobile users of any Zulip server.)
So at this point it's long past safe for us to unconditionally
send these. Hardwire the old `SEND_REMOVE_PUSH_NOTIFICATIONS`
setting to True, and simplify it out.
We've for a while had logic to set plan_type to LIMITED when importing
into Zulip Cloud; we need corresponding logic to set it to SELF_HOSTED
when importing into a self-hosted server.
Fixes#11541.
For internal stream messages, most of the time, we have access to
a Stream object. For the few corner cases where we don't, it is a
much cleaner approach to have a separate function that accepts a
stream name than having one multi-option helper that accepts both
names and objects.
This changes the border-radius to 6px for the tabbed display, which is not
in line with the current Zulip style for border-radius (4px). However 6px
really looks a lot better for this (possibly because it's a bigger box than
most of our other boxes?)
If we make a practice on the Zulip server of always explicitly setting
the desired priority, then when an old server doesn't set the priority
we can reasonably have the bouncer make a guess.
Rafid Aslam
Eeshan Garg
Rishi Gupta
Tim Abbott
Greg Price
synicalsyntax
Anders Kaseorg
Challa Venkata Raghava Reddy
Rohitt Vashishtha
Raymond Akornor
sahil839
Vishnu Ks
Abdelhadi Dyouri