This no longer has any rules specific to it. We leave the `postgres`
munin group (which now only contains `postgres_appdb`) as
future-proofing, and so that `postgres_appdb` matches to the puppet
manifest of the same name.
This method is called on a `bitfield.types.BitHandler` object, not a dict; as
such, it is not a runtime failure.
This was missed in 035ed93111 and adjacent commits because it was not
`six.iteritems()` but just a bare `iteritems()` -- having been added
after 9e3c3e14f5 moved all other calls from `iteritems()` to
`six.iteritems()`.
Comment on why this is not a leftover python2-ism.
Grep finds no other remaining callsites to `iteritems` or friends:
```
$ rg '\.iter\w+\(' -t py
zerver/lib/url_preview/preview.py
44: content = next(response.iter_content(1000))
zerver/lib/email_notifications.py
49: for link_info in fragment.iterlinks():
zerver/lib/push_notifications.py
508: nested_levels = len(list(ol.iterancestors('ol')))
zerver/lib/bugdown/__init__.py
1364: parsed = etree.iterparse(StringIO(rendered))
zerver/lib/bugdown/nested_code_blocks.py
47: if parent.text is None and len(list(parent)) == 1 and len(list(parent.itertext())) == 1:
```
Make sure that we use the max password length defined in
RegistrationForm.MAX_PASSWORD_LENGTH when validating the
password for the password reset form.
Fixes#15087.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Previously, we had to fiddle with the generated HTML to update
individual values. Now, we can simply ask the widget to rerender
the row that we updated.
This is done by passing an html_selector function that returns
a selector for the rendered item.
If:
- we do not provide html_selector function
- item is not currently rendered
- new html is not a string.
then the render_item() call is a noop.
We do not shift much of the validation logic here just
yet. This function has been declared at the top of the
file to act as usage docs for the widget as well, in
terms of what combinations of opts are valid and what
are not.
We remove the "GROUP PMs" section that used
to be in the lower right sidebar.
Most of this is straightforward code removal.
A couple quick notes:
- The message fetching code now just
calls `huddle_data.process_loaded_messages`,
which we still need for search suggestions.
We removed `activity.process_loaded_messages`.
- The `huddle_data.process_loaded_messages`
function no longer needs to return `need_resize`.
- In `resize.js` we now just calculate
`res.buddy_list_wrapper_max_height` directly
from `usable_height`.
This fixes the calculation for how far from the
top of the viewport we think #right_sidebar's
top is. To fully explain this commit requires
some background info.
Normally `#right-sidebar` has 50px of top margin
and 0px of top padding. And our `resize.js`
calculations have been accurate for the normal
case.
But when you are in the so-called `.expanded` mode
(i.e. when you're in a narrow window) we split up the
50px as follows:
- 40px margin
- 10px padding
Why don't I make the CSS just be more consistent here?
- If you go to 50px in the "expanded" mode
you mostly cover up the right scrollbar,
except for the 10px gutter that is below
the 40px-tall `.header` section. To fully
cover it we apparently want the padding;
otherwise you see a small, unusable remnant
of the scrollbar which just looks funny.
- If we were to make the "regular" right sidebar
just always have the 40/10 split, then we
would start to diverge from the left sidebar,
which is currently 50/0 as well.
- If we went to make both the left and the right
sidebars 40/10 split, well, that's just an
even riskier change.
So instead I fix the resize calculation:
I just calculate the actual `top` position.
Is any of this actually user-facing?
Yes. Now if a user is a narrow window and
they open the buddy list, we will make
the buddy list 10px smaller to account for
the padding. This makes it less likely for
the invite link to get squeezed out.
We'll use this in the next commit.
Note that there's a minor change in the order
in which we apply new heights--we now
do sidebars before bottom whitespace.
We had a bunch of places where we
were calling `resize.resize_bottom_whitespace`
with no arguments, which has been a no-op
since the below commit that removed support
for our `autoscroll_forever` option:
fa44d2ea69
With the `autoscroll_forever` options things
like opening/closing the compose box could
alter how much bottom whitespace you'd want,
but we stopped supporting that feature in
2017.
Since then bottom_whitespace has just always
been 40% of the viewport size. So we only need
to change it on actual resize events.
It's worth noting that we still call
`resize_bottom_whitespace` indirectly in many
places, via `resize_page_components`, and
the latter actually causes
`resize_bottom_whitespace` to do real work,
but that work is redundant for most of those
codepaths, since they're not triggered by
changes to the viewport. So there are other
opportunities for cleanup.
The `buddy_list_wrapper` has zeros margins, so it's
just noise in the current calculations. You can
verify this pretty easily with console statements,
as well as looking at the code. I tried it with
various permutations of narrow windows and display
settings.
The header is 40px tall, with a 10px gutter
below it, which means the top of our sidebars
are 50px from the top of the viewport.
Now all the places that share these values
use `$header_right` and related values.
This is pretty easy to test out by just doubling
or tripling the two numbers at the top of the
file.
The section for `@media (max-width: 500px)` seems
to have its own smaller values for things like
the `height` of `.header`, so I left it alone.
Siddharth Varshney
Alex Vandiver
Anders Kaseorg
Imran Iqbal
Hemanth V. Alluri
Rohitt Vashishtha
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Steve Howell