Activity.js now has the capability to track huddles that
come through in loaded messages and return them in reverse
chronological order by their most recent message. Right
now this only connected to a unit test, not any production
code.
(imported from commit 59957086fa2e454e5711472df091f178217aed2b)
This can be squashed with the prior commit, which inlined this
MIT check into update_users() while trying to avoid other
complications. After inlining the code, it's clear that we
don't need to call the sort_users() line of code for MIT users,
so I moved the MIT guard condition up.
(imported from commit fa5b52e14964ad595b34d40ce6c8450ea93726c5)
Since ui.set_presence_list is only called from activity.js, I am
inlining the code into activity.update_users(). This also allows
us to move ui.presence_descriptions into activity.js, which
is the right home for presence-related things.
(imported from commit 0ff239275c544a86c14d517bc386d06726b81cd9)
The user_info var was mapping users to presence information, and
presence_info is a better name for it. This change is partly tactical,
as it sets us up to inline ui.set_presence_list, which receives
user_list as presence_list and then has a completely different
variable called user_info.
By doing this pre-factoring, the next commit becomes just a pure
code move without more moving parts of renaming variables.
(imported from commit 4b015d19886b43d24905124eb37cd9dd317aa87b)
These engagement data will be useful both for making pretty graphs of
how addicted our users are as well as for allowing us to check whether
a new deployment is actually using the product or not.
This measures "number of minutes during which each user had checked
the app within the previous 15 minutes". It should correctly not
count server-initiated reloads.
It's possible that we should use something less aggressive than
mousemove; I'm a little torn on that because you really can check the
app for new messages without doing anything active.
This is somewhat tested but there are a few outstanding issues:
* Mobile apps don't report these data. It should be as easy as having
them send in update_active_status queries with new_user_input=true.
* The semantics of this should be better documented (e.g. the
management script should print out the spec above)x.
(imported from commit ec8b2dc96b180e1951df00490707ae916887178e)
This helps make our statuses more meaningful and should resolve trac #1534.
As part of this, we lower OFFLINE_THRESHOLD_SECS to 1.1̅6 minutes and
mark the user as idle after 5 minutes.
(imported from commit ee6b1ad203554a84b11e16c4c6195be9df5bcf4f)
There are also one or two places we don't need to use it for security
purposes, but we do so for consistencey.
(imported from commit aa111f5a22a0e8597ec3cf8504adae66d5fb6768)
In a few cases the $.each was doing something imperatively that was
terser and easier to understand by using a different Underscore method,
so a few of these I rewrote.
Some code was using the fact that jQuery sets `this` in the callback to
be the item; I rewrote those to use an explicit parameter.
Some code was using $(some selector).each(callback). I converted these
to _.each($(some selector), callback).
One function, ui.process_condensing, was written to be a jQuery $.each
callback despite being in a totally different module from code using it.
I noticed this and updated the function's args.
(imported from commit bf5922a35f257c168cc09ec1d077415d6ef19a03)
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Luke Faraone
Zev Benjamin
Scott Feeney
Tim Abbott