We now include whether the message was a private or group private
message; this is particularly important with the new setting to
disable including any message content in these emails (since in that
case, one doesn't know anything about the message types).
@brockwhittaker wrote the original prototype for having
pills in the recipient box when users compose PMs (either
1:1 or huddle). The prototype was test deloyed on our
main realm for several weeks.
This commit includes all the original CSS and HTML from
the prototype.
After some things changed with the codebase after the initial
test deployment, I made the following changes:
* In prior commits I refactored out a module called
`user_pill.js` that implemented some common functions
against a more streamlined version of `input_pill.js`,
and this commit largely integrates with that.
* I made changes in a prior commit to handle Zephyr
semantics (emails don't get validated) and tested
this commit with zephyr.
* I fixed a reload bug by extracting code out to
`compose_pm_pill.js` and re-ordering some
calls to `initialize`.
There are still two flaws related to un-pill-ified text in the
input:
* We could be more aggressive about trying to pill-ify
emails when you blur or tab away.
* We only look at the pills when you send the message,
instead of complaining about the un-pill-ified text.
(Some folks may consider that a feature, but it's
probably surprising to others.)
Add `translate_emoticons` to `prop_types` and `expected_keys`.
Furthermore, create a emoji-translating Markdown inline pattern.
Also use a JavaScript version of `translate_emoticons` and then use
this function during Markdown previews and as a preprocessor. This
is only needed for previews, because usually emoticon translation
happens on the backend after sending.
Add tests for emoticon translation, a settings UI, and a /help/ page
as well.
Tweaked by tabbott to fix various test failurse as well as how this
handles whitespace, requiring emoticons to not have adjacent
characters.
Fixes#1768.
Now, the fixtures.json file:
* Has all keys sorted alphabetically.
* Has a space after every `:`.
The file was generated using json.dumps with the appropriate
formatting parameters.
Note that this is one of the few fixtures that isn't tested against
a running server. But it still makes sense to move it to fixtures.json so
that it is rendered with indenting and a space after every `:` by
the api_code_example extension.
This works simimlar to the "n" key for next topics.
This commit does a few things:
* It wires up the hotkey to an existing function
that could change narrows.
* It adds documentation.
* It adds logic to make sure the compose box does
not open.
@showell helped a bit with the wording of comments here.
Fixes#4874
This commit:
* Removes the unnecessary screenshot.
* Reorders the instructions and combines them in to 4 steps.
* Improves the contents of the webhook-url-with-bot-email-indented.md
macro and makes it more consistent with create-bot-construct-url.md.
* Sets the recommended stream name to "commits", since that's what
the webhook function for Beanstalk expects in
zerver/webhooks/beanstalk/view.py. This allows us to use the
create-stream.md macro.
Previously, we used to raise an exception if the direct dev login code
path was attempted when:
* we were running under production environment.
* dev. login was not enabled.
Now we redirect to an error page and give an explanatory message to the
user.
Fixes#8249.
This commit adds a test for the sample fixture for when an invalid
stream name is passed to a query that expects a valid stream name
as an argument. This is the case with almost all of our queries
documented under the sidebar heading "Streams".
EDIT: Actually, I was wrong. This payload is highly specific to
get-stream-id, so it shouldn't be a part of common-error-payloads
at all.
In templates/zerver/api/delete-queue.md, we have a sample fixture
for when the queue_id passed to client.deregister_queue is not
valid or the event queue in question has already been deleted.
This commit tests that fixture.
Note that this error payload is specific to client.deregister_queue.
In templates/zerver/api/create-user.md, we have a sample fixture
for when a client attempts to create a user with the same email
as an existing user. This commit adds a test for that fixture.
Note that this error payload is specific to client.create_user
and this error payload isn't generated anywhere else.
In templates/zerver/api/add-subscriptions, we have a sample fixture
for when the user being subscribed is already subscribed to a
stream. This commit tests that fixture against a running server.
This commit adds tests for the fixture for when a user is not
authorized (perhaps because the query requires the use of admin
privileges) for a particular query.
In templates/zerver/api/update-message.md, we have a sample fixture
for when a zulip.Client does not have the permission to update/edit
a particular message. This commit adds a test for that fixture.
Also, tools/test-api now also uses a non-admin client for this test,
which might come in handy in the future.
This commit adds tests for the sample fixture for when a required
request argument is missing. Also, it moves the sample fixture
to common-error-payloads.md, since this is an error payload that
is common to most requests (except the ones that don't take any
arguments).
In templates/zerver/api/private-message.md, we have a sample fixture
for when the email address of the PM's recipient is invalid. This
commit makes sure that fixture is tested against a running server.
In templates/zerver/api/stream-message.md, we have a sample fixture
for when the target stream does not exist. This commit adds a test
for that sample fixture.
We make request to check availibity of subdomain which also checks the
subdomain for illegal characters. Duplicating the backend logic in
frontend in this case is thus no longer necessary.
We have a good "Help Center" section in the footer, where a user
may already expect to look for help/support related requests, so
we can replace the navbar spot there with the "Why Zulip" page link.
This commit modifies the Markdown extension in bugdown/api_code_examples.py
to support rendering code examples in multiple languages by specifying
the language like so:
{generate_code_example(python)|doc.md|example}
This makes us one step closer towards adding support for testable
JavaScript code examples.
In this commit we add support for some tags which are also called
void-elements according to
http://w3c.github.io/html/syntax.html#void-elements to be parsed by
our template parser and get tagged as singleton_html_tags.
Fixes: #8387.
This is the first step in cleaning up the bot edit code.
Since the bot edit form appears dynamically, we remove
it from the static HTML scaffold, of which settings_sidebar
is a part of.
We now have a separate page for common error payloads, for example,
the payload for when the client's API key is invalid. All error
payloads that are presented on this page will be tested similarly
to our other non-error sample fixtures.
To generate a code exammple,
{generate_code_example|<api_doc_md>|example} sounds better and
more intuitive than,
{generate_code_example|<api_doc_md>|method}
Users having only account in one realm will not be distracted by realm
name in subject lines of every email. Users who have multiple
accounts in realms can turn this setting on and receive a
corresponding realm name in email's subject.
Tweaked by tabbott to rebase and address a few small issues.
Fixes#5489.
Also refactor the "panels"/banner code to be a bit clearer about how
it's supposed to generically work, using [data-process] as a uniquely
identifying marker.
Fixes: #8166.
[greg: rebased and squashed a series of fixup commits.]
Fixes improper katex rendering in markdown help template. The
rendering was originally correct, but was broken when we upgraded to a
new version of KaTeX with a different HTML/CSS interface.
"Sign up" -- pretty important for people to be able to read that!
There's also the "or" that gets rendered as a big "OR" in a divider --
but that styling is too brittle, so that if "or" becomes e.g. "oder",
the lines stay the length they should be for "or" and the lot of them
wrap. Yuck. Better to leave it as "or" until that's fixed.
If there was a realm on the base URL, its logo and name were being
displayed when registering a new realm (i.e. the page where realm details
are entered, after confirming email). This commit prevents the realm
details from being displayed.
Fixes#8186
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in tools/lib/api_tests.
Now that we have a Markdown extension-based test framework for
generating and testing code examples on our /api pages, we don't
need this macro anymore!
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_example to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This is the last commit in the series of commits for completing the
project of cleaning up our html templates to have 4 space and
valid indentation.
Fixes: #1236.
In this commit we also fix a test which would fail as a result of
doing this cleanup since the test wasn't designed to take into
account the space chars which might occur in the beginning of a
html line.
It makes sense to make our Python and JS API examples more visible
than our curl examples, since Python is what most people will tend
to use.
Also, from a design perspective, an API documentation page that
starts off with a shiny Python example with syntax highlighting
looked much better than having a bland curl example be the first
thing readers see.
In this we change the way 'Sending...' is displayed. Instead of
hardcoding it into the template we make change the paradigm so
that we can have a flexible message about what's happening
rather than just always saying 'Sending...'. For eg. this will
help in the upcoming feature of Scheduled Messages by having this
message say 'Scheduling...'.
This is a server setting so I created the section "Server settings" in the help sidebar for this to go under, and rewrote the copy and retook the images that were originally done by @Privisus due to some issues.
The main cleanup here is to move the examples out of the bulleted
list, which was getting rendered in an ugly/confusing way.
I also removed some redundant text, fixed some typos, and changed
the wording a bit.
This commit documents the get-streams endpoint, which can be
by making a GET request to /api/v1/streams.
Note that in the code examples, JavaScript is missing an example
for how to pass in the `include_` query parameters. That is
because zulip-js's client.streams.retrieve function doesn't take
any arguments and zulip-js does not export any function equivalent
to client.call_endpoint in python-zulip-api/zulip.
The JS module we ask our users to install in the installation
instructions is zulip-js, not zulip. These examples would fail
with the latter. This commit updates the examples to use the
name zulip-js.
This commit does the following:
* Move the Arguments table data from stream-message.md and
private-message.md to a JSON file.
* Add a Markdown extension that allows one to include and render
a table from a JSON file like so:
{generate_arguments_table|arguments.json|private-stream.md}
* Use Bootstrap's .table class to format the table instead of
relying on custom CSS.
The JSON response for when an invalid API key is used to initiate
an API call seems to be identical in every case, so this macro
can be reused all the time.
The JSON response for when an API call to send a message is
successful is the same for both private and stream messages, so
these macros may be used again.
This commit adds the following:
* A table specifying the arguments that are required for this API
call.
* Examples of JSON responses.
This will help us in obsoleting api_endpoints.html.
This commit adds the following:
* A table specifying the arguments that are required for this API
call.
* Examples of JSON responses.
This will help us in obsoleting api_endpoints.html.
This commit splits usage.md into two separate docs,
stream-message.md and private-message.md. The arguments and return
values for sending a stream message are somewhat different from
those of sending a private message, so it made sense to split the
two up for clarity.
Currently, users are warned when mentioning @all and @everyone, but not
when posting on the #announce stream. Confirm with users that they want
to send their message on #announce if over 60 people are going to be
notified.
Fixes#6928.
This reverts commit 5a1869901. I reviewed this change and decided not
to merge it yet, but then I did anyway <_< >_>, along with some others
in the same PR.
When a user with no account tries to login using GitHub/Google auth
they are given an option to register. If the user chooses to
register, a mail is sent for verification and the user has to continue
registration as if they signed up using email. This is confusing and
a bit annoying, so instead of sending email I have changed the
procedure to just redirect to /register where they can start
registration over and proceed normally.
An ideal implementation for this would be to just allow users to
continue registration without email or going back to register.
[greg: tweaked to keep existing user-facing text]