Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in
'notify_realm_custom_profile_fields' which can lead to a situation,
if any db operation is added after the 'send_event' in the action
functions using it, where we enqueue event but the action function
fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
The database operations in 'access_user_group_for_setting' and
'check_add_user_group' used in 'add_user_group' view should be
collectively atomic.
This commit adds transaction.atomic decorator for that purpose.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'delete_user_grou' codepath
which can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after
the 'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'edit_user_group' codepath
which can lead to a situation where we enqueue events but the
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_set_zoom_token' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_delete_draft' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_edit_draft' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_create_drafts' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'delete_scheduled_messages'
which can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after
the 'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'edit_scheduled_messages'
which can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after
the 'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in
'try_deliver_one_scheduled_messages' which can lead to a situation
where we enqueue events but the action function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_mark_onboarding_step_as_read'
which can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
This deletes them directly, rather than move them into archival,
because that would be slow, and bloat the archival table in a way
which might interfere with other deletions.
Previously, comment related notifications only displayed the issue
title as a plain string. This commit reformats the issue title to
include a link back to the Jira issue.
Adjusted the Jira documentation for recent changes in their UI
when setting up webhooks, reformatted the note about compatible
Jira version, and added a link to Jira's official webhook guide.
Note that the link in zulip_update_announcements.py is not updated
so that the content in the source code reflects what users actually
received in the update announcement message.
This bug was introduced in da9e4e6e54.
validate validate_plan_for_authentication_methods is already called
inside validate_authentication_methods_dict_from_api, conditionally on
settings.BILLING_ENABLED. This additional, redundant call runs
regardless of BILLING_ENABLED, and thus prevents a self-hosted server
from enabling certain backends in the organization settings UI.
The impact of this is limited - in order to encounter this bug, a
self-hosted server would have to first disable the backend in the UI, as
self-hosted realms are created with all backend flags enabled. A backend
doesn't show up in the org settings UI until it is first enabled in
AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS in settings.py - that's why this is a rare
state. A sequence of steps like this has to be followed to reproduce:
1. Add the backend to AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS in settings.py.
2. Disable the backend in the org settings UI.
3. Now try to re-enable it, which fails due to the bug.
This commit removes create_web_public_stream_policy setting
since web-public channel creation permissions are now
handled by group-based setting.
We still pass "realm_create_web_public_stream_policy" in
"/register" response though for older clients with its
value being set depending on the value of group based
setting. If we cannot set its value to an appropriate enum
corresponding to the group setting, then we set it to
"Admins and moderators" considering that server will not
allow the users without permissions to create web-public
channels but the client can make sure that UI is
available to the users who have permission.
Messages are rendered outside of a transaction, for performance
reasons, and then sent inside of one. This opens thumbnailing up to a
race where the thumbnails have not yet been written when the message
is rendered, but the message has not been sent when thumbnailing
completes, causing `rewrite_thumbnailed_images` to be a no-op and the
message being left with a spinner which never resolves.
Explicitly lock and use he ImageAttachment data inside the
message-sending transaction, to rewrite the message content with the
latest information about the existing thumbnails.
Despite the thumbnailing worker taking a lock on Message rows to
update them, this does not lead to deadlocks -- the INSERT of the
Message rows happens in a transaction, ensuring that either the
message rending blocks the thumbnailing until the Message row is
created, or that the `rewrite_thumbnailed_images` and Message INSERT
waits until thumbnailing is complete (and updated no Message rows).
This migration references the "confirmation" app for the first time,
which means we must have migrated at least part of it by this point.
Set the migration to depend on the latest "confirmation" migration at
the time of this migration.
Migrate the following endpoints from @has_request_variables
to @typed_endpoint:
- get_user_group()
- delete_user_group()
- update_user_group_backend()
- update_subgroups_of_user_group()
- get_is_user_group_member()
- get_user_group_members()
- get_subgroups_of_user_group()
With tweaks from tabbott to avoid calling thunks unnecessarily.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_schedule_messages' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_update_user_status' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were immediately enqueueing event in
'do_remove_alert_words' which can lead to a situation, if any
db operation is added after enqueueing event in future, where the
action function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in 'do_add_alert_words' which
can lead to a situation, if any db operation is added after the
'send_event' in future, where we enqueue events but the action
function fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
GitHub sends two almost identical payloads when a pull
request is reviewed, which results in two duplicative
notification messages.
The payloads have different "action" value, with one
having the "submitted" action, whereas the other is
"edited" and has an empty "changes" dict.
We now ignore the payload with the "edited" action type
and an empty "changes" dict.
Fixes#26145.
Co-authored-by: Pieter CK <pieterceka123@gmail.com>
Prakhar Pratyush
Alex Vandiver
PieterCK
adnan-td
Lauryn Menard
Vector73
Mateusz Mandera
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
bedo
roanster007
Prakhar Pratyush
Kenneth Rodrigues
lumpleme
Tim Abbott