Steve asked me to remove this, since the tictactoe game was always
intended as a proof of concept. Now that we have poll and todo
widgets, the sample code for tictactoe has much less value.
We replace the content and type in test_widgets.py to maintain
coverage.
There is only one PostgreSQL database; the "appdb" is irrelevant.
Also use "postgresql," as it is the name of the software, whereas
"postgres" the name of the binary and colloquial name. This is minor
cleanup, but enabled by the other renames in the previous commit.
This moves the puppet configuration closer to the "roles and profiles
method"[1] which is suggested for organizing puppet classes. Notably,
here it makes clear which classes are meant to be able to stand alone
as deployments.
Shims are left behind at the previous names, for compatibility with
existing `zulip.conf` files when upgrading.
[1] https://puppet.com/docs/pe/2019.8/the_roles_and_profiles_method
There was likely more dependency complexity prior to 97766102df, but
there is now no reason to require that consumers explicitly include
zulip::apt_repository.
Installing an updated linux kernel package, as can happen during the
`apt dist-upgrade` done by the installer, can cause grub to pop up a
prompt to update its configuration file. In an unattended headless
configuration, this will stop the installation.
Explicitly configure apt to be non-interactive, and prefer the newest
configuration, during the install.
We used to send occupy/vacate events when
either the first person entered a stream
or the last person exited.
It appears that our two main apps have never
looked at these events. Instead, it's
generally the case that clients handle
events related to stream creation/deactivation
and subscribe/unsubscribe.
Note that we removed the apply_events code
related to these events. This doesn't affect
the webapp, because the webapp doesn't care
about the "streams" field in do_events_register.
There is a theoretical situation where a
third party client could be the victim of
a race where the "streams" data includes
a stream where the last subscriber has left.
I suspect in most of those situations it
will be harmless, or possibly even helpful
to the extent that they'll learn about
streams that are in a "quasi" state where
they're activated but not occupied.
We could try to patch apply_event to
detect when subscriptions get added
or removed. Or we could just make the
"streams" piece of do_events_register
not care about occupy/vacate semantics.
I favor the latter, since it might
actually be what users what, and it will
also simplify the code and improve
performance.
I think it's important that the callers understand
that bulk_add_subscriptions assumes all streams
are being created within a single realm, so I make
it an explicit parameter.
This may be overkill--I would also be happy if we
just included the assertions from this commit.
In addition to being generally more correct, this works around a bug
in Node.js that causes webpack-dev-server to corrupt the terminal
state when exiting as a background process.
https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/35536
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
It happens that whether you add a reaction or remove
a reaction, we send the exact same fields, just using
a different op code.
This sort of symmetry is actually kind of rare, as
usually "add" events have more fields, and "remove" events
might just send an id of something to remove.
Our openapi schema treats these as two seperate events,
so we are more consistent with it, and it helps our
schema-checking tooling for node fixtures, too.
Note that we now have to exempt the two events from
our openapi checks, due to the is_mirror_dummy field
in the deprecated user block. We can decide how to
handle this later--one possibility is to just add it
as an optional field on the event_schema side.
Note that we make the schema for profile_data
slightly more realistic, but it doesn't actually get
exercised by our current tests (apart from
making sure it's a dict), since we don't have
profile data for our test realm.
We also don't have the optional fields for bots,
since our tests don't exercise that, nor
delivery_email.
So we exempt realm_user_add_event from openapi
checks for now.
When we try to match the openapi specs better, we
will probably want to add a few tests to test_events.
Obviously getting good coverage for adding users
would be nice for all these scenarios:
* delivery_email matters
* bots
* realm has profile fields
This is a prep commit for supporting "presence"
events, where the key of the dictionary is some
arbitrary string like "website" but the value
of the dictionary is another dictionary itself
with keys that are more like variable names.
YashRE42
Aman Agrawal
Vishnu KS
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver
Mateusz Mandera
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott