The previous system for documenting arguments was very ugly if any of
the examples or descriptions were wrong. After thinking about this
for a while, I concluded the core problem was that a table was the
wrong design element to use for API parameters, and we'd be much
better off with individual card-type widgets instead.
This rewrites the API arguments documentation implementation to use a
basic sort of card-like system with some basic styling; I think the
result is a lot more readable, and it's a lot more clear how we would
add additional OpenAPI details (like parameter types) to the
documentation.
This allows us to block use of the desktop app with insecure versions
(we simply fail to load the Zulip webapp at all, instead rendering an
error page).
For now we block only versions that are known to be both insecure and
not auto-updating, but we can easily adjust these parameters in the
future.
Create a new page for desktop auth flow, in which
users can select one from going to the app or
continue the flow in the browser.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@protonmail.com>
We register ZulipRemoteUserBackend as an external_authentication_method
to make it show up in the corresponding field in the /server_settings
endpoint.
This also allows rendering its login button together with
Google/Github/etc. leading to us being able to get rid of some of the
code that was handling it as a special case - the js code for plumbing
the "next" value and the special {% if only_sso %} block in login.html.
An additional consequence of the login.html change is that now the
backend will have it button rendered even if it isn't the only backend
enabled on the server.
Many of them are now automatically generated by autoprefixer, while
others are unnecessary based on .browserslistrc, and some were just
wrong (the linear-gradient based checkerboard pattern in lightbox has
been broken in Firefox for a while).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
`code-section` is a feature of the markdown system, therefore the
associated CSS should be in the `markdown.scss` file. I also refactored
to use SCSS nesting.
I added the `@media (max-width: 500px)` because the text from the inner
content was gong outside the white background on mobile because of the
height of the `.markdown` class for this viewport.
I moved this `.integration-instructions .help-content h3 { margin: 20px
0 ; }` from the `portico.scss` because it should be in `integrations
.scss`.
I removed the `#hubot-integrations` because I didn't find that id
anywhere.
I removed `.portico-landing.integrations ol ul` because `.markdown`
takes care of that left spacing.
The integrations page had css in both `landing-page.scss` and
`portico.scss`. With this commit, the styles are mostly unified into
a single separate file.
Change the display from `block` to `flex` in order to be able to
arrange the elements as wanted. Reset the css of the header elements
only for the description view. Add `font-size: 1.2em` because the font
doesn't need resizing in this case, it needs resizing only when the
title is in the box.
Removed the `padding-bottom` from the `nav` on mobile because it
overlaps the new header and you cannot click the back button from the
integrations.
Fixes: #12365.
We remove the title from `errbot` integration documentation so that
all documentations have the same style. See
https://github.com/zulip/python-zulip-api/pull/515 for a similar
change to integrations where the docs live elsewhere in version control.
We also remove the `margin: 0` from the instruction tip because where
the tip is followed by a list, there is no space between the two; this
change doesn't mess up the other places where the tip is used.
This moves all the stylesheets like stats, billing etc. to another
directory called `static/styles/portico/`, matching the directory
structure of our JavaScript.
Tim Abbott
Siddharth Varshney
vsvipul
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Alexandra Ciobica
Yashashvi Dave
Aman Agrawal
Vaibhav