The ability to use multiple ports has been removed a long time ago.
And the "optional" note in the help message is in fact incorrect
since `addrport` being `None` is not supported.
The auth attempt rate limit is quite low (on purpose), so this can be a
common scenario where a user asks their admin to reset the limit instead
of waiting. We should provide a tool for administrators to handle such
requests without fiddling around with code in manage.py shell.
Only clear_scheduled_emails previously took a lock on the users before
removing them; make deliver_scheduled_emails do so as well, by using
prefetch_related to ensure that the table appears in the SELECT. This
is not necessary for correctness, since all accesses of
ScheduledEmailUser first access the ScheduledEmail and lock it; it is
merely for consistency.
Since SELECT ... FOR UPDATE takes an UPDATE lock on all tables
mentioned in the SELECT, merely doing the prefetch is sufficient to
lock both tables; no `on=(...)` is needed to `select_for_update`.
This also does not address the pre-existing potential deadlock from
these two use cases, where both try to lock the same ScheduledEmail
rows in opposite orders.
These checks suffer from a couple notable problems:
- They are only enabled on staging hosts -- where they should never
be run. Since ef6d0ec5ca, these supervisor processes are only
run on one host, and never on the staging host.
- They run as the `nagios` user, which does not have appropriate
permissions, and thus the checks always fail. Specifically,
`nagios` does not have permissions to run `supervisorctl`, since
the socket is owned by the `zulip` user, and mode 0700; and the
`nagios` user does not have permission to access Zulip secrets to
run `./manage.py print_email_delivery_backlog`.
Rather than rewrite these checks to run on a cron as zulip, and check
those file contents as the nagios user, drop these checks -- they can
be rewritten at a later point, or replaced with Prometheus alerting,
and currently serve only to cause always-failing Nagios checks, which
normalizes alert failures.
Leave the files installed if they currently exist, rather than
cluttering puppet with `ensure => absent`; they do no harm if they are
left installed.
This is effectively a step closer to what was proposed in
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/18678#discussion_r644490540 when
this code was written in #18678.
If the Customer object has neither of a Stripe id, nor any historical
plans, then there's no real billing association contained in the
existence of the Customer object, and it's safe to delete.
This commit allows to import the following from rocketchat:
* All users
* All public/private channels
* All teams and its public/private channels
* All discussion rooms as topics in their parent channel
* All the messages in all the channels
* All private conversations
* Reactions on messages (except for custom emojis)
* Mentions in messages (except @all, @here mentions)
Zulip identifies users by realm+delivery_email which means that the
Django changepassword command doesn't work well -
since it looks only at the .email field.
Thus we fork its code to our own change_password command.
Commit 81d7dd1fda broke this nearly
eight years ago, so probably nobody cares except the ever-watchful eye
of mypy.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This command was part of the complex migration to introduce the
`unread_msgs` data structure as the source of truth for unreads.
Effectively, it's a migration to remove anomalies that we ran several
times before turning it into the final 0104_fix_unreads.py migration.
Fixes part of #18898.
This command is part of a statsd infrastructure that we stopped
supporting years ago. Its only purpose for some time has been to
provide sample code for how the restart script might trigger a
notification to a graphing system, which doesn't justify maintaining
it.
Fixes part of #18898.
This command was part of early prototyping of the digests feature, and
in particular its purpose is better served via the organization-level
setting to control digest emails for the organization.
Fixes part of #18898.
This command was written to allow generating multiuse invite links
before the "Invite a user" UI supported them. It no longer has a
purpose and can be safely deleted.
Fixes part of #18898.
This command predates there being a normal UI for inviting users to
Zulip. It no longer has a role for which it's a better way to do
things. (Especially with upcoming API documentation for the endpoint).
Fixes part of #18898.
This command was introduced in 2013 via
6d6c3364dc as part of implementing
marking messages as read in a separate process for performance reasons.
We fixed the performance issues and removed that pipeline years ago,
but forgot to delete this.
Fixes part of #18898.
Sometimes the Slack import zip file we get isn't quite the canonical
form that Slack produces -- often because the user has unzip'd it,
looked at it, and re-zip'd it, resulting in extra nested directories
and the like.
For such cases, support passing in a path to an unpacked Slack export
tree.
The `create_user` API and data import tools can result in our having
active users in the database who haven't intentionally created a Zulip
account or agreed to the ToS; we should never email such users.
The check for `TOS_VERSION is not None` is necessary for the
development environment, which has `TERMS_OF_SERVICE` set but not
`TOS_VERSION`.
It's likely that we will want this check in other places as well.
`deliver_scheduled_emails` and `deliver_scheduled_messages` use their
respective tables like a queue, but do not have guarantees that there
was only one consumer (besides the EMAIL_DELIVERER_DISABLED setting),
and could send duplicate messages if multiple consumers raced in
reading rows.
Use database locking to ensure that the database only feeds a given
ScheduledMessage or ScheduledEmail row to a single consumer. A second
consumer, if it exists, will block until the first consumer commits
the transaction.
This makes it parallel with deliver_scheduled_messages, and clarifies
that it is not used for simply sending outgoing emails (e.g. the
`email_senders` queue).
This also renames the supervisor job to match.
Since the invariant we're trying to protect is that every realm has an
active owner, we should check precisely that.
The root bug here, which the parent commit failed to fix properly, is
that we were doing a "greater than" check when we clearly originally
meant a "less than" check -- lower role numbers have more permissions.
Long-term, we probably want to make the filtering options more
generic, but there's little harm in adding an option for a specific
group we're likely to email multiple times.
Add a `--dry-run` flag to send_custom_email management command
in order to provide a mechanism to verify the emails of the recipients
and the text of the email being sent before actually sending them.
Add tests to:
- Check that no emails are actually sent when we are in the dry-run mode.
- Check if the emails are printed correctly when we are in the dry-run mode.
Fixes#17767
model__id syntax implies needing a JOIN on the model table to fetch the
id. That's usually redundant, because the first table in the query
simply has a 'model_id' column, so the id can be fetched directly.
Django is actually smart enough to not do those redundant joins, but we
should still avoid this misguided syntax.
The exceptions are ManytoMany fields and queries doing a backward
relationship lookup. If "streams" is a many-to-many relationship, then
streams_id is invalid - streams__id syntax is needed. If "y" is a
foreign fields from X to Y:
class X:
y = models.ForeignKey(Y)
then object x of class X has the field x.y_id, but y of class Y doesn't
have y.x_id. Thus Y queries need to be done like
Y.objects.filter(x__id__in=some_list)
Mateusz Mandera
PIG208
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver
Tim Abbott
Priyansh Garg
Gaurav Pandey
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Siddharth Asthana
sahil839