When I was initially writing the tests to solve issue #10131 in PR
2 schema checkers as I modified the code to send the rendered_value
only when required.
When I was using just 1 schema checker shared between two code paths,
we needed _allow_only_listed_keys. But after shifting to 2 schema
checkers for the two different cases, we no longer needed that flag,
and it's better to remove it for a stronger check.
We had a bug where if you started typing a message
and then used quote/reply (after the fact), we
would overwrite the user's original message.
The bug was kind of subtle--the internal call
to "respond" to the message would select the message
text, and then `smart_insert` would replace the
selection, unless it was Firefox.
Note that we now also allow you to cross-post
replies, which is a plausible scenario, although
possibly unintentional at times, too. I'm erring
on the side of giving the user control here, but
I'll add a warning in the next commit. Our compose
fade feature should also prevent unintentional
mixes here, too.
We often need to go to the server to get raw content.
The exceptions are messages for which we've already
fetched the raw content for some other reason (maybe
a previous quote-and-reply) or which are locally echoed.
Whether we can get the raw content locally or from
the server, the replace_content() logic is the same.
NOTE: If you revert this commit, you want to revert
the immediately prior commit as well. The history
is that Ishan made some improvements to the widget,
but there were some minor bugs. I decided not
to squash the commits together so that the git
history is clear who did what. (In particular, I
want questions about the JS code to come to me if
somebody does `git blame`.)
Anyway...
This is a fairly significant rewrite of the polling
widget, where I clean up the overall structure of
the code (including things from before the prior
fix) and try to polish the prior commit a bit as
well.
There are a few new features:
* We tell "other" users to wait for the poll
to start (if there's no question yet).
* We tip the author to say "/poll foo" (as
needed).
* We add edit controls for the question.
* We don't allow new choices until there's
a question.
This also fixes few unusual UI issues like an invitation got failed when
certain emails can't be invited then the error box is left with "warning"
even when next request got succeed and another case when invitation got
succeed after failing it's still reported with "alert-error" class alert
banner.
It's no longer used, as can be seen in
2d52463b61, in past we use `type` for
specifiying whether status is 'subscriptions-status' or else, which isn't
used now, hence `type` is removed here.
This reverts the temporary fix done in commit
46f4e58782 and replaced it with the fix that
non-admins should be able to see a dropdown to select a non-admin type of
invited user i.e. normal member or guest user.
This commit fixes a bug that caused:
1: A valid full name on an onboarding form to be cleared after an
invalid submission.
2: Incorrectly cleared name populated from LDAP which was janky from
UX perspective.
Ideally we should disable name change for LDAP as next login
will overwrite any changes but I think that can be done in a
separate PR.
Fixes: #10867.
`fakeldap` assumes every attribute to be a multi-value attribute
while making comparison in `_comapare_s()` and so while making
comparisons for password it gives a false positive. The result
of this was that it was possible to login in the dev environment
using LDAP using a substring of the password. For example, if the
LDAP password is `ldapuser1` even entering `u` would log you in.
On the backend, we extend the BlockQuoteProcessor's clean function that
just removes '>' from the start of each line to convert each mention to
have the silent mention syntax, before UserMentionPattern is invoked.
The frontend, however, has an edge case where if you are mentioned in
some message and you quote it while having mentioned yourself above
the quoted message, you wouldn't see the red highlight till we get the
final rendered message from the backend.
This is such a subtle glitch that it's likely not worth worrying about.
Fixes#8025.
These mentions look like regular mentions except they do not
trigger any notification for the person mentioned. These are
primarily to be used when you make a bot take an action and
the bot mentions you, or when you quote a message that mentions
you.
Fixes#11221.
Apparently, zoom's API will (sometimes?) return a 201 (not 200)
created in response to the API request to create a call. We fix this
by using the proper requests check for whether or not the request
failed.
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
sameerchoubey
kunal-mohta
Puneeth Chaganti
Hemanth V. Alluri
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu Ks
Rohitt Vashishtha
ishanrai05
Rishi Gupta
Harshit Bansal
Shubham Jadon
Shubham Dhama
Adarsh Patel
Anders Kaseorg