This will eventually let us delete a bit of annoying compatibility
code from the desktop app’s injected JavaScript.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Running the close handler won’t break anything; it’s safe to delete
from a Map while iterating through it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This exists in all versions of the desktop app that we still support,
and will eventually let us delete a bit of annoying compatibility code
from the desktop app’s injected JavaScript.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The condition was removed because in either case we
want to have the stream_row and not the sub/unsub
button, so we can always get the stream_row directly.
When a user is reading messages only in stream or topic narrows, the pointer
can be left far behind. Using this to compute the furthest_read_time causes
the banckruptcy banner to be shown even when a user has been actively
reading messages. This commit switches to using the sent time on the last
message that the user has read to compute the furthest read time.
This hack was important when only the mobile apps (and not the webapp)
were using the unread_msgs data structure and the first_unread
infrastructure. Now that the webapp is using those things, there
aren't leaked ancient unread messages that aren't accessible on the
webapp, so any few users still in this situation can get out of it by
just reading the problematic messages.
I don't think we've had a use for these tools since our unread systems
stabilized shortly after they were written, so it makes sense to just
remove them rather than updating them for the pointer migration.
In Django 2.1, the preferred way to express a nullable BooleanField
changed from NullBooleanField to passing null=True to BooleanField.
This updates our codebase to use the preferred API. Tweaked by
tabbott to update the linter rules.
The migration is a noop for Django accounting only.
Part of #11341.
We had a user have problems with the user
profile menus that you get when you click
on either sender avatars or mention pills.
If a deactivated user had a long enough email
that we would normally want to un-hide the clipboard
icon for them, we would crash inside of
`init_email_clipboard`, because the icon isn't
there for them. If the user didn't have the
console open to see the crash, the symptom
became that you would get multiple cards
visible and kind of "stuck".
I chose to fix this by just making the code
defensive with respect to the absence of the
icon, instead of short-circuiting it for
deactivated users.
It's a bit odd that we still have an element
matching `.user_email_popover` in the profile
card for deactivated users, since that element
doesn't actually include an email, but it instead
says "(This user has been deactivated)". I
considered removing the class, but the CSS
that we use for emails kind of applies here
too.
Testing this is a kind of a pain, as you want
either long emails or to just temporarily hack
this condition to true:
if (this.clientWidth < this.scrollWidth) {
// ...
}
And then test with a deactivated user, of course.
Fixes#14473
This cleans up any messages that might have been exchanged with
`NEW_USER_BOT` or `FEEDBACK_BOT` (cross-realm bots that were last
used, as far as we know, years ago) that have been completely removed
from the codebase.
Details on the algorithm are in the migration code itself.
Fixes#13583.
Previously, the message and event APIs represented the user differently
for the same reaction data. To make this more consistent, I added a
user_id field to the reaction dict for both messages and events. I
updated the front end to use the user_id field rather than the user
dict. Lastly, I updated front end and back end tests that used user
info.
I primarily tested this by running my local Zulip build and
adding/removing reactions from messages.
Fixes#12049.
Some sites don't render correctly unless you are one of the latest browsers.
YouTube Music, for instance, changes the page title to "Your browser is
deprecated, please upgrade.", which makes our URL previews look bad.
This allows to run scripts between extraction and install
process.
It will be used to restore npm caches for production install jobs.
We extract the tarball in the working directory so that yarn.lock and
package.json are available to restore cache.
(And also so the path is deterministic).
Now that we've cleaned up this tool's output, there's no reason to use
an awkward mechanism to hide its output; we can just print it out like
a normal program.
Fixes#14644; resolves#14701.
This ancient migration imports boto, which interferes
with our upgrade to boto3.
> git name-rev f13d6a18ebf13d6a18eb tags/1.6.0~1082
We can safely assume nobody is upgrading from a server on <1.6.0,
since we have no supported platforms in common with those releases.
This ancient migration imports boto, which interferes
with our upgrade to boto3.
> git name-rev 8ae35211b58ae35211b5 tags/1.6.0~1924
We can safely assume nobody is upgrading from a server on <1.6.0,
since we have no supported platforms in common with those releases.
This ancient migration imports boto, which interferes
with our upgrade to boto3.
> git name-rev a32f666f5ca32f666f5c tags/1.6.0~2384
We can safely assume nobody is running servers on <1.6.0; there are no
supported platforms in common with 1.6.0 anyway.
We could anchor the regexes, but there’s no need for the power (and
responsibility) of regexes here.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
In passing, we also get coverage for
list_render.get.
This test also implicitly demonstrates that
you can call `widget.sort` directly from some
external event handler; in other words, you
are not locked into the widget's conventions
for setting up <th> tags.
We now forbid tags of the form `<foo ... />` in most
places, and we also forbid it even for several void
tags.
We make exceptions for tags that are already formatted
in two different ways in our codebase. This is mostly
svg tags, plus these common cases:
- br
- hr
- img
- input
It would be nice to lock down a convention for these,
even though the HTML specification is unopinionated
on these. We'll probably want to stay flexible for
svg tags, since they are sometimes copy/pasted from
other sources (although it's probably rare enough for
them that we can tolerate just doing minor edits as
needed).
If folks put something like '<br/>' in the HTML,
we would think the tag's name was "br/" instead
of "br". I think we were assuming most folks
would write either "<br>" or <br />".
ASIDE:
We should probably have a consistent
preference among these styles:
* <br>
* <br/>
* <br />
I prefer the first.