This commit introduces non-intro hotspots.
They are a bit different than intro hotspots in the
following ways:
* All the non-intro hotspots are sent at once instead of
sending them one by one like intro hotspots.
* They only activate when a specific event occurs,
unlike intro hotspot where they activate after the
previous hotspot is read.
Now, the topic wildcard mention follows the following
rules:
* If the topic has less than 15 participants , anyone
can use @ topic mentions.
* For more than 15, the org setting 'wildcard_mention_policy'
determines who can use @ topic mentions.
Earlier, topic wildcard mentions followed the same restriction
as stream wildcard mentions, which was incorrect.
Fixes part of #27700.
This commit updates the backend code to allow changing
can_access_all_users_group setting in development environment
and also adds a dropdown in webapp UI which is only shown in
development environment.
This commit moves a major portion of the 'update_plan`
view to a new shared 'BillingSession.do_update_plan' method.
This refactoring will help in minimizing duplicate code
while supporting both realm and remote_server customers.
This makes it possible for a self-hosted realm administrator to
directly access a logged-page on the push notifications bouncer
service, enabling billing, support contacts, and other administrator
for enterprise customers to be managed without manual setup.
has_billing_access already has the is_realm_owner check:
@property
def has_billing_access(self) -> bool:
return self.is_realm_owner or self.is_billing_admin
We previously did not allow setting signup_notifications_stream and
notifications_stream settings to private streams that admin is not
subscribed to, even when admins have access to metadata of all the
streams in the realm and can see them in the dropdown options as well.
This commit fixes it to allow admins to set these settings to private
streams that the admin is not subscribed to.
Previously, the notifications had "commented" as the action word
for every event.
As part of these changes, we extract a shared comment action function
in GitHub Integration that's used for both issue and discussion
comment events.
Instead of adding the assignee to the end of the message body,
we update the message body where the verb is so that the link
formatting at the end of the message is not broken, for example:
"user_a assigned user_b to [issue #XXX title text is here](link)."
This matches the formatting for the issue assigned message body.
Instead of adding the assignee to the end of the message body,
we update the message body where the verb is so that the link
formatting at the end of the message is not broken, for example:
"user_a assigned user_b to [issue #XXX title text is here](link)."
Also updates the issue title in the test fixture so that it tests
that only the first instance of "assigned" or "unassigned" in the
issue title is updated for the assignee text.
Also adds punctuation to the issue title in the test fixture to
test the expected behavior for titles that end in a value from
`string.punctuation`.
We did not remove the objects for deactivated streams from
subscriptions field in apply_event. We need to do this because
we do not send "subscription/remove" events to subscribers
when deactivating streams.
Guests might lose access to deactivated users if the user
is not involved in any DM with guest. This commit adds
code to send "realm_user/remove" events for such cases.
We now send user creation events to recipient users
when sending DMs if recipients gain access to either
sender or other pariticpating users in the DM.
This commit adds code to send "realm_user/remove" event
when a guest user loses access to a user due to the user
being unsubscribed from one or more streams.
This commit adds code to send user creation events to
guests who gain access to new subscribers and to the
new guest subscribers who gain access to existing
stream subscribers.
The presence and user status update events are only sent to accessible
users, i.e. guests do not receive presence and user status updates for
users they cannot access.
This commit adds code to make sure that update events for changing
a user's role, email, etc. are not sent to guests who cannot access
the modified user.
We do not send the original user data in user creation events
to guests if user access is restricted in realm, as they would
receive the information about user if user is subscribed to some
common streams after account creation.
This commit adds code to update access_user_by_id to raise
error if guest tries to access an inaccessible user.
One notable behavioral change due to this is that we do
not allow guest to mute or unmute a deactivated user if
that user was not involved in DMs.
Pull request comment alerts were previously sent to a topic for an issue,
which resulted in two different topics for the same PR.
Fixes: #26086.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
Updated the repo name and pull request number/title for the new
pull request commit fixture to be the same as the one used for the
other pull request test fixtures (e.g. pull_request__opened) so
that the TOPIC_PR can be used in the subsequent updates.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
This may happen if there are multiple servers with the same UUID
submitting data (e.g. if they were cloned after initial creation), or
if there is one server, but `./manage.py clear_analytics_tables` was
used to truncate the analytics tables.
In the case of `clear_analytics_tables`, the data submitted likely has
identical historical values with new remote `id` values; preserving
the originally-submitted contemporaneous data is the best option. For
the case of submissions from multiple servers, there is no completely
sensible outcome, so the best we can do is detect the case and move
on.
Since we have a lock on the RemoteZulipServer, we know that no other
inserts are happening, so counting before and after will return the
true number of rows inserted (which `bulk_create` cannot do in the
face of `ignore_conflicts`[^1]). We compare this to the expected
number of new inserted rows to detect dropped duplicates.
[^1]: See https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30138.
This reduces the giant load spike at 5 minute past the hour, when all
remote servers currently attempt to submit their records.
We do not wish to slew over a full hour, because we want to ensure
that we do not hold the lock when the next hour's analytics runs. It
is also not necessary to have that much variation; 10 minutes is
picked as an arbitrary "long enough" time to spread requests over.
Earlier, for the emails having latex math like
"$$d^* = +\infty$$", the bad rendering led to the math
being included multiple times in the email body.
This was due to displaying KaTeX HTML without the CSS.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior by replacing
the KaTeX with the raw LaTex source.
Fixes part of #25289.
This is a useful helper using the same API as
send_analytics_to_push_bouncer(), but uploading only realms info. This
is useful to upload realms info without the risk of taking a long time
to process the request due to too much of the *Count analytics data.
The original behavior of this setting was to disable LDAP
authentication for any realms not configured to use it. This was an
arbitrary choice, and its only value was to potentially help catch
typos for users who are lazy about testing their configuration.
Since it makes it a very inconvenient to potentially host multiple
organizations with different LDAP configurations, remove that
behavior.
This commit adds a new option 'DMs, mentions, and followed topics'
to 'desktop_icon_count_display' setting.
The total unread count of DMs, mentions, and followed topics appears
in desktop sidebar and browser tab when this option is configured.
Some existing options are relabeled and renumbered. We finally have:
* All unread messages
* DMs, mentions, and followed topics
* DMs and mentions
* None
Fixes#27503.
While the server implementation has accepted this value for a few
months as part of building the feature, following topics was not a
fully supported feature of the Zulip server before
3f2ab44f94, just before feature
level 219.
So that's probably the correct level to document as the first feature
level at which we recommend that clients supporting the followed
topics feature process the value.
These new models are incomplete and totally untested, but merging this
will provide valuable scaffolding for doing smaller PRs working on
individual gaps, and reveals a clear set of TODOs/refactoring/model
changes needed to support where want to end up.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
Riken Shah
Prakhar Pratyush
Sahil Batra
David Rosa
Mateusz Mandera
Satyam Bansal
Lauryn Menard
Aman Agrawal
Alex Vandiver
Tim Abbott