This avoids an unnecessary join to UserProfile.
To verify this, you can do `print(queries)` in the
`test_get_custom_profile_fields_from_api` test. It's
kinda noisy, so I excerpted them below...
Before:
SELECT ...
FROM "zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"
INNER JOIN "zerver_userprofile" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."user_profile_id" = "zerver_userprofile"."id")
INNER JOIN "zerver_customprofilefield" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."field_id" = "zerver_customprofilefield"."id")
WHERE "zerver_userprofile"."realm_id" = 2
After:
SELECT ...
FROM "zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"
INNER JOIN "zerver_customprofilefield" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."field_id" = "zerver_customprofilefield"."id")
WHERE "zerver_customprofilefield"."realm_id" = 2'
I don't have any way to measure the two queries with
realistic data, but I would assume the second
query is significantly faster on most of our instances,
since CustomProfileField should be tiny.
The line removed here is a noop, as both sides of the
immediately following conditional reassign the
same variable.
This harmless cruft was the result of the recent commit
1ae5964ab8, which added
support for single-user GETs.
Apparently, the arguments passed to template_database_status were
incorrect for the manual testing development database, in that we
didn't pass a status_dir when calling into that code from provision.
The result was that provisioning before running `test-backend` would
ignore changes to the list of check_files (etc.) made after rebasing,
and vice versa.
The cleanest fix is to compute status_dir from other values passed in;
I'm also going to open a follow-up issue for creating a better overall
interface here.
This adds a new API endpoint for querying basic data on a single other
user in the organization, reusing the existing infrastructure (and
view function!) for getting data on all users in an organization.
Fixes#12277.
This code is a bit flatter and just preps the data
for a single user. There is never any interaction
between the data for user A and user B, so we can
mostly avoid complicated nested data structures
and do most of the data-crunching on a per-user basis.
We also do an explicit sort of the data before
running it through groupby. The explicit sort
simplifies how we calculate `most_recent_info`
and also avoids needing to add `dt` to an intermediate
data structure.
Finally, when it comes to the individual client data,
the code has relied on the assumption that there is
only one row per client, which I believe to be true,
but now the code is more explicit about that.
django-phonenumber-field 2.4.0 adds tighter phone number validation
that rejects +12223334444 for having an invalid area code. This was
reverted in 4.0.0, but django-two-factor-auth still requires <3.99.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This commit includes a new `stream_post_policy` setting,
by replacing the `is_announcement_only` field from the Stream model,
which is done by mirroring the structure of the existing
`create_stream_policy`.
It includes the necessary schema and database migrations to migrate
the is_announcement_only boolean field to stream_post_policy,
a smallPositiveInteger field similar to many other settings.
This change is done to allow organization administrators to restrict
new members from creating and posting to a stream. However, this does
not affect admins who are new members.
With many tweaks by tabbott to documentation under /help, etc.
Fixes#13616.
This flag affects page_params and the
payload you get back from POSTs to this
url:
users/me/presence
The flag does not yet affect the
presence events that get sent to a
client.
This should ensure that folks rebasing past this commit from an older
database model get their database rebuilt in the way that will
match the test_subs.py query count of 40.
We will want to raise RateLimited in authenticate() in rate limiting
code - Django's authenticate() mechanism catches PermissionDenied, which
we don't want for RateLimited. We want RateLimited to propagate to our
code that called the authenticate() function.
As more types of rate limiting of requests are added, one request may
end up having various limits applied to it - and the middleware needs to
be able to handle that. We implement that through a set_response_headers
function, which sets the X-RateLimit-* headers in a sensible way based
on all the limits that were applied to the request.
While the result of this change doesn't completely do what we need, it
does remove a huge amount of duplicated lists of fields. With a bit
more similar work, we should be able to eliminate a broad category of
potential bugs involving Stream and Subscription objects being
represented inconsistently in the API.
Work towards #13787.
This has the side of effect of making new fields we add to Stream be
automatically included, which will help maintain this code as we
upgrade it.
This commit adds is_web_public, history_public_to_subscribers, and
email_notifications fields to the dictionary.
This modifies get_cross_realm_dicts in zerver.lib.users to call
format_user_row. This is done to remove current and prevent future
inconsistencies between in the dictionary formats for get_raw_user_data
and get_cross_realm_dicts.
Implementation substantially rewritten by tabbott.
Fixes#13638.
This moves get_cross_realm_dicts (from zerver.lib.actions),
get_raw_user_data and get_custom_profile_field_values (from
zerver.lib.events) to zerver.lib.users.
This extracts the user_data inner function from get_raw_user_data as a
reusable function. We intend to reuse it for cross-realm user dicts.
A few changes were made while extracting it:
* Renaming the UserProfile argument to acting_user, so we can do loops
over a local user_profile variable.
* Moved it to zerver.lib.users, as that's a more appropriate home for
this function formatting data on users.
* Simplified the calling convention for passing custom profile fields
to reflect the fact that this function processes a single user (and
is expected to be called in a loop).
"Zulip Voyager" was a name invented during the Hack Week to open
source Zulip for what a single-system Zulip server might be called, as
a Star Trek pun on the code it was based on, "Zulip Enterprise".
At the time, we just needed a name quickly, but it was never a good
name, just a placeholder. This removes that placeholder name from
much of the codebase. A bit more work will be required to transition
the `zulip::voyager` Puppet class, as that has some migration work
involved.
Hashir Sarwar
Steve Howell
Vishnu KS
Tim Abbott
akashaviator
Anders Kaseorg
Ryan Rehman
Mateusz Mandera