It is not clear why 84723654c8 added these lines, are they are not
related to status codes.
Using an explicit `capture_exception` causes the exception in Sentry
to not have a `logger` field, which is quite useful for filtering.
Pass the HttpRequest explicitly through the two webhooks that log to
the webhook loggers.
get_current_request is now unused, so remove it (in the same commit
for test coverage reasons).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Because the third party might not be expecting a 400 from our
webhooks, we now instead use 200 status code for unknown events,
while sending back the error to Sentry. Because it is no longer an error
response, the response type should now be "success".
Fixes#24721.
Adds `is_webhook_view` boolean field to the RequestNotes class so
that (when implemented) `ignored_parameters_unsupported` feature
is not something that is applied to webhooks.
These were useful as a transitional workaround to ignore type errors
that only show up with django-stubs, while avoiding errors about
unused type: ignore comments without django-stubs. Now that the
django-stubs transition is complete, switch to type: ignore comments
so that mypy will tell us if they become unnecessary. Many already
have.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This change incorporate should_rate_limit into rate_limit_user and
rate_limit_request_by_ip. Note a slight behavior change to other callers
to rate_limit_request_by_ip is made as we now check if the client is
eligible to be exempted from rate limiting now, which was previously
only done as a part of zerver.lib.rate_limiter.rate_limit.
Now we mock zerver.lib.rate_limiter.RateLimitedUser instead of
zerver.decorator.rate_limit_user in
zerver.tests.test_decorators.RateLimitTestCase, because rate_limit_user
will always be called but rate limit only happens the should_rate_limit
check passes;
we can continue to mock zerver.lib.rate_limiter.rate_limit_ip, because the
decorated view functions call rate_limit_request_by_ip that calls
rate_limit_ip when the should_rate_limit check passes.
We need to mock zerver.decorator.rate_limit_user for SkipRateLimitingTest
now because rate_limit has been removed. We don't need to mock
RateLimitedUser in this case because we are only verifying that
the skip_rate_limiting flag works.
To ensure coverage in add_logging_data, a new test case is added to use
a web_public_view (which decorates the view function with
add_logging_data) with a new flag to check_rate_limit_public_or_user_views.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This allows us to separate the zilencer paths from other JSON paths,
with explicit type annotation expecting `RemoteZulipServer` as the
second parameter of the handler using
authenticated_remote_server_view.
The test case is also updated to remove a test for a situation that no
longer occurs anymore, since we don't perform subdomain checks on
remote servers.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Doing the dispatch to authenticated_json_view first lets us avoid
messing around with the skip_rate_limiting parameter.
Since rate_limit itself checks user.is_authenticated, there's no
potential downside to doing that check first here.
This refactoring is necessary to separate the expected type annotation
for view functions with different authentication methods. Currently the
signature aren't actually check against view functions because
`rest_path` does not support type checking parameter types, but it will
become useful once we do.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`authenticated_rest_api_view` and `authenticated_json_view` essentially
remove `UserProfile` from the decorated function.
Note that `authenticated_log_and_execute_json` is removed to avoid
duplicating `ParamT` unnecessarily in the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This refactors rate limit related functions from `zerver.decorator` to
zerver.lib.rate_limiter.
We conditionally import `RemoteZulipServer`, `RequestNotes`, and
`RateLimitedRemoteZulipServer` to avoid circular dependency.
Most instances of importing these functions from `zerver.decorator` got
updated, with a few exceptions in `zerver.tests.test_decorators`, where
we do want to mock the rate limiting functions imported in
`zerver.decorator`. The same goes with the mocking example in the
"testing-with-django" documentation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This refactors `rate_limit` so that we no longer use it as a decorator.
This is a workaround to https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/12909 as
`rate_limit` previous expects different parameters than its callers.
Our approach to test logging handlers also needs to be updated because
the view function is not decorated by `rate_limit`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Decorators like `require_server_admin_api` turns user_profile into a
positional-only parameter, requiring the callers to stop passing it as a
keyword argument.
Functions like `get_chart_data` that gets decorated by both
`require_non_guest_user` and `has_request_variables` now have accurate
type annotation during type checking, with the first two parameters
turned into positional-only, and thus the change in
`analytics.views.stats`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This makes `has_request_variables` more generic, in the sense of the return
value, and also makes it more accurate, in the sense of requiring the
first parameter of the decorated function to be `HttpRequest`, and
preserving the function signature without using `cast`.
This affects some callers of `has_request_variables` or the callers of its
decoratedfunctions in the following manners:
- Decorated non-view functions called directly in other functions cannot
use `request` as a keyword argument. Becasue `Concatenate` turns the
concatenated parameters (`request: HttpRequest` in this case) into
positional-only parameters. Callers of `get_chart_data` are thus
refactored.
- Functions to be decorated that accept variadic keyword arguments must
define `request: HttpRequest` as positional-only. Mypy in strict mode
rejects such functions otherwise because it is possible for the caller to
pass a keyword argument that has the same name as `request` for `**kwargs`.
No defining `request: HttpRequest` as positional-only breaks type safety
because function with positional-or-keyword parameters cannot be considered
a subtype of a function with the same parameters in which some of them are
positional-only.
Consider `f(x: int, /, **kwargs: object) -> int` and `g(x: int,
**kwargs: object) -> int`. `f(12, x="asd")` is valid but `g(12, x="asd")`
is not.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`ParamSpec` can be easily applied to many use cases of ViewFuncT with
`Concatenate` to help us get rid of the `cast` calls. This does not
include decorators that require the second argument being
`UserProfile`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
As we refactor this, any decorators that `zulip_login_required` depends
on are also refactored to use `ParamSpec`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This eliminates the possibility of having `request.user` as
`RemoteZulipServer` by refactoring it as an attribute of `RequestNotes`.
So we can effectively narrow the type of `request.user` by testing
`user.is_authenticated` in most cases (except that of `SCIMClient`) in
code paths that require access to `.format_requestor_for_logs` where we
previously expect either `UserProfile` or `RemoteZulipServer` backed by
the implied polymorphism.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
In b46af40bd3,
we set this attribute because back then we might call `rate_limit_user`
on `RemoteZulipServer`.
This is no longer the case as `RemoteZulipServer` now has its own rate
limiting and we never call `rate_limit_user` without an `isinstance` check
for `UserProfile`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We can express the same idea more simply by not passing `user` in
cases where it isn't valid for UserActivity.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This makes it mandatory to narrow the type of the user to `UserProfile`
before calling this helper.
This effectively removes the `request.user` check. We do not call login_page
anywhere else without getting through the authentication middleware.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
It's hard to come up with a realistic story where this would matter:
SHARED_SECRET is generated automatically during server setup at the
same time as SECRET_KEY, which is a required setting, but it seems
preferable to be explicit that this is a required parameter for the
internal_notify authentication model.
Instead of using request.POST to get any potential `secret`
parameter used in `authenticate_notify` for `internal_notify_view`
decorator, moves it to the REQ framework parameters as `req_secret`.
Updates existing tests to explicitly test for a request without
`secret` parameter, which defaults to `None`; this is also tested
in `test_event_system.py`.
The name does not really comply with the actual behavior of
the decorator since it returns True for an unauthenticated user.
This makes it clear that the 2fa check only applies to users that
are already logged in.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This replaces user.is_verified with is_2fa_verified.
The helper does extra checks such that the user being checked for 2fa
authentication status is valid.
`request.user.is_verified` is functionally the same as `is_verified`
from `django_otp.middleware`, except that the former is monkey-patched
onto the user object by the 2FA middleware. We use the latter wrapped
in `is_2fa_verified` instead to avoid accessing the patched attribute.
See also: 6b24d56e59/docs/source/overview.rst (authentication-and-verification)
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This simulates the situation in which the user is not
authenticated (as an AnonymousUser) and have 2FA enabled.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`POST` is an immutable attribute and `_files` is an internal attribute
of `HttpRequest`. With type annotations provided by `django-stubs`, mypy
stops us from modifying these attributes. This uses `cast` and `setattr`
to avoid typing issues.
This is a part of django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We previously parsed any request with method other than {GET, POST} and
Content-Type other than multipart/form-data as if it were
application/x-www-form-urlencoded.
Check that Content-Type is application/x-www-form-urlencoded before
parsing the body that way. Restrict this logic to {DELETE, PATCH,
PUT} (having a body at all doesn’t make sense for {CONNECT, HEAD,
OPTIONS, TRACE}).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
54b6a83412 fixed the typo introduced in 49ad188449, but that does
not clean up existing installs which had the file with the wrong name
already.
Remove the file with the typo'd name, so two jobs do not race, and fix
the typo in the comment.
Alex Vandiver
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
Lauryn Menard
Tim Abbott
Zixuan James Li