Fixes#792. I'm really curious what (if anything) this change does to
our Tornado load numbers.
(imported from commit daf81d2dea81f36ec4a3eb19993169b58681e717)
This cuts the MIT Zephyr home page load time and also #subscriptions
database-sourced load time for me from about a second to about 50ms on
my laptop. The home page still takes about 600ms to load due to
templating.
(imported from commit 1cfd8c750301abe6b6a881be4b2857532be947ec)
The purpose of the validator is to ensure the user isn't active, so
let's correctly test for that here.
(imported from commit 772ddb901098f78750efab274405a10f36c49232)
Previously we checked and bailed when there was a user registered with
an email address, regardless of active status.
This meant that MIT users who had inactive accounts autocreated had
issues where they would be confusingly told they were signed up even
though they had never taken any action on our site directly.
Now we instead check whether there are any current *active* user
accounts with that email address, and proceed with generating an
activation link if the user lacks a corresponding active account.
Security implications of this commit come into play if we start
implementing removing users ability to sign in as deactivation. Since we
lack a user removal story here, this isn't terribly concerning yet and
we'll revist this code when we decide to add such functionality in the
future.
This resolves trac #581 and #631.
(imported from commit c3fb93ce065e63e19b41f63c1f27891b93b75f86)
(And to let you know that it's OK that you have no messages.)
This fixes Trac #850 for the case where you first log in.
(imported from commit 47741856e34f67bfc2cc91bdc21def75ab6fe09d)
The previous select_related didn't properly get the User object,
containing the email address, and thus would make one query per user
with presernce information.
(imported from commit 3341bc5a65387030fa8737b03ca43f79089ef56b)
On my dev machine this cuts /activity load time with lots of users by more than
2/3. I expect the gains will be even greater in production due to the greater
relative cost of database queries.
(imported from commit 0391cb29f66b618b4b99902d9fb9ab0a6cff0cb3)
I don't like monkeypatching in general, but this will give us logging
of how much time is being spent in total on database queries on our
staging and prod instances for each of the views we have -- which
should help a lot with debugging performance problems.
The code being patched is identical in Django 1.5, so I don't expect
any issues upgrading in the near future.
I may work on a patch to upstream Django to support this as well.
(imported from commit 08624c7a30f1fd192a972973e0380dd6a131d84e)
The previous commit stopped the mousewheel event at .bottom_sidebar,
which means it was never getting to our individual scrolling lists.
(imported from commit 92d32c21bb596d0e14d887ff779a857223d45342)
This isn't perfect, because if, e.g. the stream list is super short,
it still takes up lots of space that the user list might want to use,
but it's an acceptable first pass solution, in my view.
(imported from commit 669737d769258c089b40ffea4abee3229902e857)
When DEBUG=False, Django doesn't log the data at all. We can and
should add tracking of that at some point, but it requires patching
Django; so for now just log the data when DEBUG=True.
(imported from commit 2b9e6a4c68009733373724f38debe4e77313fdeb)
This should make it much easier to debug issues where a particular
user is hosing our API, for example.
(imported from commit cbea49fd1e11805cadf564bd9160d3d6bf7e0eca)
This lets us clean up the HTML a little bit in preparation
for a later change which will cause the stream and people
lists to scroll independently of one another.
Also it feels a bit more fun.
(imported from commit b3b49149d7ec2960fd752fe50b41e55d363c1a98)
This is actually a tricky one, because:
* Later, probably if we display an unread count by the person's
name, the action on clicking them might very well be
"Narrow to PMs with that person"
* But for now, while we don't have that, everything about
historical precedent really does strongly suggest that
clicking that person's name is going to get you a PM with
that person.
So we implement that. For now anyway.
(imported from commit 4d461fd6edec122d542c4a97e23f2e400c31122e)
SimpleQueueClient was not thread-safe as the pika method
calls that we are using might disconnect and end up in a bad
state if two threads enqueue messages at the same time.
In order to avoid this, each user of the rabbitmq queue
gets its own instance of a SimpleQueueClient.
(imported from commit 694083b75cd58a60b8de282a8f40eb92a864c5ce)
Note: When deploying, restarting the process-user-activity-commandline script is needed
(imported from commit 63ee795c9c7a7db4a40170cff5636dc1dd0b46a8)
Adds a new db table for storing presences, and an API for setting
an individual user's idleness as well as fetching all idle status
for all users in a realm
(imported from commit 5aad3510d4c90c49470c130d6dfa80f0d36b0057)
Now if you click the timestamp, the popover appears near there, rather than in
the middle of the message.
(imported from commit 285a71fddd5b6d9ac86511e5fe41c811d2663342)
Now that this isn't the object controlling the actions popover, we can set its
title= back to anything we like.
(imported from commit 36d3ecb23fd22cdc9189537820b944442f7bb5c6)
This addresses another usability problem from #470.
I decided it was too confusing to have menu options for both stream and subject
narrowing, so I went with the latter.
(imported from commit 948fca954a265029ceb27c72ae178015d513785d)
Hopefully the text and link-like styling will make it more clear that this
feature exists.
The sender's name is still clickable, but loses the link-like styling since the
popover isn't about the sender. The space between the sender's name and this
link is now active as well.
We also remove the sender's email address that was previously visible on hover.
It's not hard for the name + email + actions link + timestamp to be too long
for one line. The email is still present in the popover.
(imported from commit 3a85f199c42102cac0d217543db0a539935e2914)
We now set a CSS class on the hovered message, which is used to
control email address visibility.
(imported from commit 787e24f71f20aa3a6452e57b94f5ca1a4c8bc32f)
The message timestamp is now always clickable, and the popover contains the
full long-form date and time. This addresses one problem from usability
testing (see #470).
(imported from commit ad502dff128ad1c934fc0d3faaf5e2931c91c37e)
Bootstrap ignored this and instead used the title= attribute, containing the
full timestamp, which seems like what we want.
(imported from commit 8442835d61f89bd0bce75c05e17aabe85e0f417c)
The interface is a little messy because so many of the inputs change
-- we need to better organize all these variables under centralized
'zfilt' and 'zhome' headings.
(imported from commit b247e86bf63ea2ea2c0d42ef23e8af0ce288d5dd)
So here's the reproduction recipe:
(1) Find a narrow that doesn't have any messages since 4 days ago
(2) Directly visit that narrow in your browser (or wait for someone to
do a deploy and thus auto-reload)
(3) Wait until load_old_messages has been called at least once
(4) Un-narrow
(5) Scroll up, and notice that the 400 most recent messages are above
sets of older messages.
The cause is that the code in add_messages assumed that
selected_message_id was within the range of message already in the
home view. This is true in most cases where add_message is being
called, but it is not true in the case that the user was in a narrowed
view containing only very old messages (And thus selected_message_id
would be older than everything in the home view).
We can fix this by tracking persistent_message_id separately and using
that for the relevant test in add_messages.
(imported from commit f0da2561ba68f729343b260adc398029fae6acf7)
Code like this is dangerous:
class SimpleQueue(object):
queues = set()
because all instances will share the same 'queues' set object.
We don't really need multiple instances, but neither is there a reason to break
them. So do the normal Python thing instead.
(imported from commit a56bb8414dd549cfd312c9565df198cf9d20f08a)
Prior to this commit, successfully creating a stream (or unsubscribing
from a stream) didn't clear earlier error messages.
Here's how you could reproduce it:
* Try to subscribe to ""
(You get an error)
* Now unsubscribe from something, or subscribe
to a new stream
(The error message does not go away)
(imported from commit c3c6fa6081df00378182ff0c3499e9d907577c04)
Prior to this commit, we also cleared out all of your checkboxes,
which is frustrating if you wanted to invite another person to the
exact same set of streams.
(imported from commit 389f27ec35dc9bf8c9058c5ffa867929ac90f674)
Tim Abbott
Luke Faraone
Reid Barton
Waseem Daher
Keegan McAllister
Leo Franchi
Jessica McKellar
Jeff Arnold
Zev Benjamin