Some preliminary work is needed before documenting mobile feature.
Adds Desktop/Web tab and improves wording.
Splits instructions into "Send PM" / "Send group PM".
Documents sending a PM via the user actions menu.
We were not handling hashchange for user group settings
under diffrent conditions. So this commit adds logic for
handling various diffrent cases of hashchange for user
group settings. We also take care that #groups only in
development environment.
This is preparatory commit that does basic UI set up for
user group edit in group settings overlay. This allows us to
write proper hashchange logic for user group settings overlay
under diffrent situations.
The work in this commit will be extended in further commits
to add proper UI and group edit logic.
Add support for creation of user groups using right panel
of new user group settings overlay being developed as part
of https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/19526.
In further commits we will add support for editing user
groups using right panel of the overlay.
This commit also introduces a minor bug related hashchange
for #groups which would be a quick fix once we have UI
for group edit on #groups overlay.
This is a preparatory commit to set up basic UI for right panel
in user group settings overlay. At this point we only ensure
the proper display of the two panels under different screen sizs.
Actual functionality for user group creation and user group
edit will be added in subsquent commits.
Dedicated overlay for user group settings is added as part of
addressing zulip#19526.
The newely added overlay is currently empty and more UI
related to settings is to be added in further commits.
A preparatory commit to have legacy user group settings logic
as we move forward to redesign the user group settings.
This is done so that current user group settings are functional
while we are working on the redesign, and also to make it clear
that most of the code in this file will be deleted and developers
should avoid spending much time on it.
We now set the value inside custom input element of message and delete
limit setting to the original setting value when hiding the input in
process of changing the setting.
This fixes the bug of the save-discard button not hiding on doing
the following changes -
- Change the setting value from Anytime (or any other option) to custom.
- The save-discard widget appears. Now write something in custom input
box.
- Then change the setting value to the original value, which in this
case can be considered Anytime as mentioned above.
The save-discard widget should be hidden after above steps because
the setting value is changed to its already set value, but it does
not without doing the changes in this commit because
check_property_changed returns true for custom input element.
The "Save changes" button was not re-enabled if the initial
setting value was "Anytime" and then setting is changed to
"Custom" (which disabled the button since input is empty) and
then followed by changing to some other option.
This commit fixes the above mentioned bug. This bug was
introduced in #21837 where we added the functionality to
disable the save button.
This is a prep commit so that we can reuse the function to enable
or disable the save button when changing the message edit and delete
setting dropdown.
On changing either one of message edit or delete limit setting
from "Any time" to "Custom", the "Save changes" button is not
enabled even after entering valid input.
We can see this bug if both the edit or delete limit setting is
set to "Anytime" initially and one of the setting is changed to
"Custom".
This is because the custom input for "Any time" case is empty even
though it is hidden and the check for disabling the button was
not checking whether the input is hidden or not.
This commit changes the code to consider the value in custom input
box only if the input is visible, i.e. the dropdown value is set to
"Custom".
This bug was introduced in #21837 where we added the functionality
to disable the save button.
This commit fixes the bug where save-discard was not hidden when message
edit or delete setting is first changed from "Anytime" to any other value
and then again to "Any time". The save-discard widget should be hidden
since the setting is value was "Any time" already.
The bug was because check_property_changed returned true for
"realm_message_content_edit_limit_minutes" and
"realm_message_content_delete_limit_minutes" for above case as value of
setting in page_params for "Any time" case is "null" and
get_input_element_value returned "undefined" as the custom input box is
empty for "Any time" case.
This bug was introduced in #21837 where we changed the input box to be
empty for "Any time" case.
When a message is deleted, if it was the only message in the topic
and it was the previously focused message in recent topics, then
the topic is no longer in the recent topics data.
In this case, we revive the focus to the adjacent message or, if it
was the last message in the view, the focus is reset to the search
bar.
Some legitimate requests in Zulip can take more than 20s to be
processed, and we don't have a current problem where having a 20s
limit here is preventing a problem.
These characters are not allowed and trying to create a Zulip message
with those characters throws a JsonableError in check_stream_topic.
We don't want to reject emails with those chars in the subject, so
it's best to just modify it appropriately.
This commit checks for null values for keys within "attachment" in
the Slack integration's incoming payloads. These keys were expected
to exist optionally previously, and the existence of null values for
these wasn't anticipated. Due to an issue report for such null
values in the payload, their handling is updated appropriately.
The checks for these values are truthiness checks since the strategy
for these values being null or falsy ("", 0) is the same; we don't
process that key-value pair. This is consistent with how Slack handles
this scenario.
For the case where all the attachment fields have null values, Slack
displays this as an empty block with no content, and therefore our
strategy for this is a no-op.
Tests updated.
Since this decorator is only used for methods of
TestServiceBotEventTriggers, we can type the decorated method's
signature accurately without using ParamSpec.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We can express the type of these decorators with Concatenate and ParamSpec
now for tighter type annotations.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This removes ViewFuncT and all the associated type casts with ParamSpec
and Concatenate. This provides more accurate type annotation for
decorators at the cost of making the concatenated parameters
positional-only. This change does not intend to introduce any other
behavioral difference. Note that we retype args in process_view as
List[object] because the view functions can not only be called with
arguments of type str.
Note that the first argument of rest_dispatch needs to be made
positional-only because of the presence of **kwargs.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This module was originally introduced in 2016 to assist adding mypy
annotations to the project. Back then static type checking was not that
established throughout the codebase, so it was helpful to be able to
print out the types for type checking purposes.
This workflow is no longer helpful for improving type annotations right
now, and it has been unused for a while.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Followup to commit fde9b1d366 (#22753).
(This was a misuse of “idempotent”. “Idempotent” means that
performing the request more than once in a row has the same effect as
performing it once; it says nothing about whether the response is
cacheable.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
It’s been unused since commit 2eacc7317d
removed the only caller of abort_all and commit
ef815e9e79 removed abort_all itself.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This was added by commit 7f174213ed, and
appears to have been designed for responses that are *successful* but
falsy. Logically, these should not implicitly represent a failure to
be retried if it were.
Note from tabbott: The background is that this idempotent retry loop
was a hacky workaround for a bug we never understood but saw daily in
production. Especially during server restarts / client reloads,
something would result in 200 responses with no data being seen by the
frontend, despite the Django server not having received/processed the
request. Fortunately, this strange failure mode appears to have
stopped happening in late 2019, so we can delete this hack.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Commit 9aa5082d63 (#20673) incorrectly
changed the name of the error callback passed to channel.get. This
prevented reporting of errors while moving a topic. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
David Rosa
Purushottam Tiwari
Sahil Batra
Lauryn Menard
Matt Keller
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Hari Prashant Bhimaraju
Aman Agrawal
Zixuan James Li
Israel Ebonko
Ganesh Pawar
Anders Kaseorg