We want the UserActivity.query field to reflect the name of the
function for REST calls, not the URL, and we accomplish this by
setting request._query to target_function.__name__.
(imported from commit 9df05fef0dffb34483b182b95f8cbc4409083eed)
If request._query is set in the call to update_user_activity(),
we will use that instead of request.META['PATH_INFO'] for
the query field of the UserActivity row we write.
(imported from commit fcee30098e1c7c5cb4195a1e5905fc7b88af804f)
This results in some small behavior changes. First, if a user
has both malformed JSON and an invalid API key, they will now
be informed of the invalid API key, not the malformed JSON,
because the decorator wrapping code executing first. Second,
we call process_client(), which basically builds us a
UserActivity record with the client "API".
(imported from commit fadb523db9bdc82984bdae61833c5c99f1ebd1c0)
This is for webhook API endpoints that only get passed in an api_key,
not an email. An example would be api_jira_webhook, and some of
the code is borrowed from there. The rest of the code is from
authenticated_api_view().
(imported from commit b5b2a4ea52f9b317f00357ef3142c76534fabf20)
Add the number of person-minutes for the last 24 hours to the
realm report on the main tab of /activity.
(imported from commit 2ff46eacc4c8276ab0407fc6ff9f28f5137f1ed2)
When decoding an operand, a + can be converted to a space
only if the operand is not an email address.
(imported from commit 08fc36a579bbe6409137c60c0fa9579fe3ab2c43)
This tab shows how long each user has been on during the last 24
hours, using data from UserActivityInterval. Much of the code
is borrowed from analyze_user_activity.py, but in this version
we set the time interval to be the last 24 hours and sort by
realm and email. I also ensure that it only executes one
query to get all the data (and there's test coverage for that).
(imported from commit 7a2b80f52679054b03c5f5f42b2cda07d5599432)
Waseem is ok with removing the client-specific tabs on the
main /activity page. This reduces the number of queries from
25 to 1. We might eventually restore some of that logic, but
we will do it more efficiently. A lot of the data for
non-website clients is kind of unreliable, anyway.
The page looks kind of funny with only one tab, but that
will be fixed in the next commit.
(imported from commit 54f08f89d5242ad3e045d8ca0d97b86617c15380)
When we don't already have old messages in cache, we need to
fetch data from the database and create dictionaries for the
cache. This commit makes that process work in 50ms, instead
of 130ms, for the data set in test_bulk_message_fetching(),
which is 602 records. Before this commit we had about 132
microseconds of unnecessary churn per message, because we
were fetching DB fields we didn't need and incurring the cost
of the Django ORM. Now we use values() to get only the columns
we need, and we take advantage of previous commits that make
our code less OO and more function-driven, so we can pass the
values directly to build_message_dict() without having to create
objects.
A couple caveats on this commit:
1) I haven't been able to get good measurements on the overall
effect on get_old_messages_backend(). If you kill the cache to
force DB queries, you introduce noise related to sessions and
user profiles.
2) Look at the long comment in this commit related to
re-rendering messages in this codepath. The problem precedes
this commit.
(imported from commit dcb64aa9416f0e9583355ddd6dc3adfa746b9fc7)
Only call a function on the message object in the unfortunate
situation that we are rendering new content in to_dict_uncached().
Long term, it would be nice if this function didn't have side
effects, and we had a better strategy for upgrading rendered
content when bugdown versions change.
(imported from commit 2a323f52af37a6d651c171cb8234fbfa3d25d561)
This function doesn't require the whole UserProfile object to
create the avatar url, and we call it from Message.to_dict_uncached().
(imported from commit e814caab101c4fedd1ba66df041a3408014e4085)
For a bunch of self-dot references, move them to the top. (This
is kind of funny out of context, but it sets us up for future
refactorings.)
(imported from commit 4ebc1c44a633d86772df1828c51180707769c3dc)
If this line of code were ever called, it would crash anyway,
because it would be an unknown type, and Recipient.type_name()
would raise a KeyError.
(imported from commit db38c5f71fb2f0b044a832eb88e53fceb0d8a9cf)
This is a variation of get_display_recipient that takes
values instead of an object, so that it is decoupled from
the Django object system.
(imported from commit 25bed43ecd62f1fe0176d517b7003e7f4c78bc37)
If it's ok for the tests to use memcached, it should be ok
for them to use the in-process cache too.
(imported from commit be43879c3c48f3780317fd5b4139b44d4a1f0ed3)
This is a harmless extraction designed to allow subclasses override
the behavior of how rendered content gets saved.
(imported from commit 9df4ed9f86c857897fcb5f2b6781bfc5a0813766)