This commit uses 'NotificationTriggers' class attributes
instead of directly using loose strings.
This should have been ideally included in the commit
c3319a5231.
The CSS for modals uses "--color-background-color" to set
background color of modal. But the variable is defined in
zulip.css which is not available for portico pages and thus
the email visibility modal was not rendering as expected in
"Terms of service" page.
This commit defines the "--color-background-color" variable
in portico.css such that it is available for portico pages
as well.
`update_recipient_bar_background_color` changes in a paint
after change in theme without using `requestAnimationFrame` to
make sure they happen in the same paint..
Replaced `setTimeout` with `requestAnimationFrame` in
`server_events_dispatch` since `requestAnimationFrame` already
ensures that they happen in the next paint, assuming that was the
intention of `setTimeout` being preset there.
We should make `get_by_user_id` type-safe in the sense that it's caller
should not expect undefined values and hence it's caller should not
need to validate the user ids.
To do this I extracted a method `maybe_get_user_by_id` which is
type-unsafe version of this function which will allow undefined values
and will behave exactly the same as the previous version. So the callers
which expects the undefined values from this function should use this
new function `maybe_get_user_by_id`.
Probably about half of these callers are implicitly iterating through
all users in the people.js data set and thus by construction should
never fail, but it's simpler to just convert all existing callers than
do that audit.
Made this function to avoid having incomplete `people` objects floating
around resulting in better type safety when using TypeScript. This function
has three required parameters - `user_id`, `email` and `full_name` and adds
default values to all other required properties.
Also removed the `user_id` field in case of `stream` type messages in favor
of `id` field because it will help us to form a well-defined object for involved
people.
Used `location.origin` instead of plain `location` because even though
passing just `location` is valid here and works because it has a
stringifier but still it will give us type error when we move this
module to TypeScript because of the expected `string` type here.
Combine nginx and Django middlware to stop putting misleading warnings
about `CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS` when the issue is untrusted proxies.
This attempts to, in the error logs, diagnose and suggest next steps
to fix common proxy misconfigurations.
See also #24599 and zulip/docker-zulip#403.
Having exactly 17 or 18 middlewares, on Python 3.11.0 and above,
causes python to segfault when running tests with coverage; see
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/106092
Work around this by adding one or two no-op middlewares if we would
hit those unlucky numbers. We only add them in testing, since
coverage is a requirement to trigger it, and there is no reason to
burden production with additional wrapping.
If the number of threads is not specified
while profiling then use a single thread. This is
because profiling across multiple threads (earlier
default behaviour) may obscure the accurate
measurement of which functions are the most costly
due to thread blocking.
Signed-off-by: Akshat <akshat25iiit@gmail.com>
It takes about 31ms per page on my box, but 191
help pages adds up quickly. I am not sure how to
optimize this test, but it will be a good litmus
test for a future better markdown processor.
This did not speed up the tests as much as I expected,
but it certainly makes the code easier to read, and
Tim is pretty confident that the zephyr logic is
fairly stable, so it's sufficient to test it on a
subset of representative urls.
dbe930394f changed the
"missing string" from "Log in" to "xyz" for some
unknown reason. The current code makes no sense.
Also, even the original test code here had the common
pitfall of only testing one side of the condition.
Presumably if you are testing that a certain string
is missing in a landing-page scenario, then you also
want to check that it **does** exist in other
scenarios. Otherwise, the flag would have been
named something more generic. Of course, I am mostly
guessing due to lack of comments.
If there is some test logic here that we need to
resurrect, then we should just write a custom test
for the /hello page rather than crufting up
all our helpers.
This removes some confusing default boolean flags, and
it checks both sides of the do-you-want-to-allow-robots
condition, so it's more thorough.
For the two strange exceptions to the normal policy,
I now handle them together in the helper function with
a comment.
I also disentangle the logic to look for og tags from
the robot logic, and this should also lead to more
thorough testing.
The prior name was just strange. This test could really
use a better comment explaining its purpose.
Also, presumably these pages don't always get 404s, so
we should really have the test exercise both conditions.
This makes us correctly run landing page logic where we
didn't before, and, more importantly, lets us skip landing
page logic where we had been erroneously running it.
This speeds up my runs from 35s to 25s.
This commit updates the text on email confirmation page to
make it more clear what's going on and why the user needs
to check their email.
Fixes#25900.
This commit fixes the bug where the edited notice is not displayed
for edited/moved messages when the edit_history is disabled for
the organization. However, this is incorrect because the edited
notice should still be shown for messages that are edited/moved,
even if the edit_history is disabled. This issue occurred because
the edit_history variable was not set in the message object when
the edit_history is disabled. Therefore, in this case, we check
for the availability of last_edit_timestr. If it is available, we
display the edited notice. Since we cannot determine if the message
was moved or edited, we show the edited notice for both cases.
This commit adds code to include can_mention_group_id field to
UserGroup objects passed with response of various endpoints
including "/register" endpoint and also in the group object
send with user group creation event.
Fixes a part of #25927.
This commit adds backend code to check whether a user is allowed
to mention a user group while editing a message as per
can_mention_group setting of that group.
Fixes a part of #25927.
This commit adds backend code to check whether user has permission
to mention a group while sending message as per the can_mention_group
setting of the group.
Fixes a part of #25927.
When c0e9e463fb was merged, the
placeholder text started updating *before* we updated the recipient
information, so it wasn't updating with correct data. This commit
fixes that by moving the onPillCreate() call below the update.
This is logic from 10 years ago (dbc4798594)
that is no longer relevant. It seems like we used to show the
search bar open all the time and only showed the buttons when
there was focus in the search bar. Now we close the search bar
when it's not being used, and no longer need to update button
visibility or disable the search close button.
We now upstream the conversion of legacy tuples
into the callers of do_events_register. For the
codepath that builds the home view, this allows
for cleaner code in the caller. For the /register
endpoint, we have to do the conversion, but that
isn't super ugly, as that's an appropriate place
to deal with legacy formats and clean them up.
We do have to have do_events_register downgrade
the format back to tuples to pass them into
request_event_queue, because I don't want to
change any serialization formats. The conversion
is quite simple, and it has test coverage.
We eliminate 220 zephyr-related checks that are all fairly
expensive.
On my machine this test went from 46s to 23s.
Note that we still get coverage of the zephyr codepath
from other tests.
Prakhar Pratyush
Alex Vandiver
Karl Stolley
Sahil Batra
Aman Agrawal
Lalit
Akshat
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Palash Baderia
evykassirer
Satyam Bansal
Tim Abbott