The values of this dictionary used to be raw DOM elements,
but get_row() wraps them again, so there's not a huge
reason to store them as raw DOM elements internally. It
is slightly easier to reason about the code if everything
stays at the jQuery level.
To preserve the old behavior here, we have to do something
that is kind of ugly, but at least it's explicit now. In
the old code, our cache was DOM elements, and if an id
wasn't in the cache, we would sneakily return $(undefined)
with this code in get_row():
return $(this._rows[id]);
And it turns out that $(undefined) is basically just a
zero-element jQuery object. A lot of our code depends
on this behavior and just works around the zero-element
objects as needed with checks like this:
if (this.selected_row()).length === 0) {
// don't try to get offset
}
For now we just preserve this behavior. We could eventually
be more strict here, or at least have aggressive warnings
on cache misses, but we'd need to retrofit code to be
able to call something like `has_rendered_selection()`
and/or deal with `undefined` as the return value for the case
where the selection hasn't been rendered.
Here is some example code that would cause tracebacks if
we just returned `undefined` for cache misses:
rerender_preserving_scrolltop: function () {
// old_offset is the number of pixels between the top of the
// viewable window and the selected message
var old_offset;
var selected_row = this.selected_row();
var selected_in_view = selected_row.length > 0;
if (selected_in_view) {
old_offset = selected_row.offset().top;
}
return this.rerender_with_target_scrolltop(selected_row,
old_offset);
},
This function is more cohesive and always takes in
a jQuery object containing exactly one DOM element,
and it does all stuff at the jQuery level of
abstraction (no raw DOM).
It's a pretty simple extraction--removing the level
of indentation makes the diff a bit noisy.
We shorten the name of the function and avoid having
all the callers call `.get()`. Now we mostly stay
in jQuery "space", which avoids some confusion about
when we're dealing with raw DOM elements and which
will facilitate unit testing.
Changed search pill padding, `.navbar-search` flex-wrap to match with
the CSS refactoring in 66df4e3e84.
The `height: 100%` changes to `.navbar-search` and `.input-append`
make up for the issue in which the pills overflowed in the mobile
view due to `.navbar-search` height being declared 40px explicitly
while the actual heiight in mobile view was shorter.
It's sorta an unusual state to get into, to have a user own a
deactivated bot, when they can't create a bot of that type, but
definitely a valid possibility that we should be checking for.
Fixes#10087.
Currently on zoom out from stream topics, scrollbar didn't scroll back
to opened stream. Because call to scroll-to-stream func isn't called
after all streams view is displayed. So wrong stream element is
passed to func.
Fix this by calling scroll-to-stream func after all-stream-list view
is displayed.
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a BitBucket integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gogs integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a GitHub integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gitlab integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/MR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
Implement this function in 'bulk_import_model'
and 'update_model_ids'.
This lets us save on redundant-feeling arguments in these
frequently-called helper functions.
This deletes the unused Subscription.notifications field and removes
it from some testing and analytics code (which should not have been
using it in the first place).
Fixes#10042.
One of the code examples for GET /users was using the raw call_endpoint
method from our Python bindings, rather than get_members, which has been
specifically designed to interact with this endpoint.
Now all the examples here use the appropiate method.
Whenever a parameter for an endpoint in our REST API has a default
value, it is displayed under the "Description" section of the
arguments table in the docs.
This way, we don't need to explicitly indicate the default values in the
description, thus avoiding duplicate information in the OpenAPI source.
We use these new functions in the message compose typeahead so that they
can also be used in a PM recipients typeahead with both people and user
groups.
We now render the "skin" part of "Stream Settings" before
adding in the actual streams. The new function
populate_stream_settings_left_panel() takes care of adding
the streams. It uses a new template called
`subscriptions.handlebars`.
Splitting out this function will give us more flexibility
for various improvements.
First, we can decide to render the list after we open the
overlay, just to avoid the problem that users don't know why
the modal's opening. (And we could add a loader spinner as
needed.)
Second, we can improve our filter features so that we do
filtering in the data instead of moving DOM rows around,
which is expensive.
Third, we can eventually introduce progressive rendering.
Finally, having the function broken out will make profiling
more precise about where bottlenecks exist.
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Shubham Padia
Rishi Gupta
Anupam Dagar
Yashashvi Dave
Cynthia Lin
Aditya Bansal
Robert Hencke
Eeshan Garg
Sujeet Kausallya Gholap
Abhigyan Khaund
Vishnu Ks
Rhea Parekh
Roman Godov
Yago González
Harshit Bansal