This was likely initiall created with null=True in
5c5ffd6ea3 just because we didn't have a
plan for backfilling this field, but I verified that Zulip Cloud has
no realms without a name set, and that's the place most likely to have
any form of super-legacy nameless realms.
So we can clean up this aspect of the data model without a special
migration to do something with existing realms with name=None (which I
suspect would have resulted in a 500 anyway).
This fixes a regression where one could end up deactivating all owners
of a realm when trying to synchronize LDAP with the `is_realm_admin`
flag configured in `AUTH_LDAP_USER_FLAGS_BY_GROUP`.
With tweaks by tabbott to add is_moderator as well.
Fixes#18677.
Since 84742a0, all settings are sent in the `user_settings` dictionary
which were previously sent inline with other fields in /register
response.
In order to simplify the process of adding new personal settings, we
want to transition to a world where new settings only need to consider
the `property_types` object, and code that needs to reference the
legacy behavior interacts with an object with `legacy` in its name.
This way, contributors working on new settings don't need to think
about the legacy code paths at all.
See https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/378-api-design/topic/user.20settings.20response.20in.20.2Fregister
to understand this better.
We move the emojiset_choices method from UserProfile class to
UserBaseSettings class because emojiset_choices exists in
UserBaseSettings class and this would be used for realm-level
settings as well along with existing user-level settings.
The `user_activity_interval` worker calls:
```python3
last = UserActivityInterval.objects.filter(user_profile=user_profile).order_by("-end")[0]
`````
Which results in a query like:
```sql
SELECT "zerver_useractivityinterval"."id", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."user_profile_id", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."start", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."end" FROM "zerver_useractivityinterval" WHERE "zerver_useractivityinterval"."user_profile_id" = 12345 ORDER BY "zerver_useractivityinterval"."end" DESC LIMIT 1
```
For users which have at least one matching row, this results in a
query plan like:
```
Limit (cost=0.56..711.38 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=0.078..0.078 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using zerver_useractivityinterval_7f021a14 on zerver_useractivityinterval (cost=0.56..1031399.46 rows=1451 width=24) (actual time=0.077..0.078 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (user_profile_id = 12345)
Rows Removed by Filter: 98
Planning Time: 0.059 ms
Execution Time: 0.088 ms
```
But for users that have just been created, with no matching rows, this
is considerably more expensive:
```
Limit (cost=0.56..711.38 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=10798.146..10798.146 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using zerver_useractivityinterval_7f021a14 on zerver_useractivityinterval (cost=0.56..1031399.46 rows=1451 width=24) (actual time=10798.145..10798.145 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (user_profile_id = 12345)
Rows Removed by Filter: (count of every single row in the table, redacted)
Planning Time: 0.053 ms
Execution Time: 10798.158 ms
```
Regular vacuuming can force the use of the index on `user_profile_id`
as long as there are few enough users, which is fast -- however, at
some point, the query planner decides that is insufficiently specific,
always chooses the effective-whole-table-scan.
Add an index on `(user_profile_id, end)`, which is expected to be
sufficiently specific that it is used even with large numbers of user
profiles.
Ref #19250.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit updates both the stream-level and realm-level message
retention setting to use 'unlimited' instead of 'forever' to set
message retention setting to "retain messages forever".
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
Part of #19272
We still keep refering to this model with "MutedTopic" to reduce the
diff size of this commit. The alias will be removed in the next commit.
This commit skips on renaming the `date_muted` field to something more
general. That will be done in further commits, along with the code and
API changes.
This commit adds can_add_custom_emoji
helper to check whether the user can
add custom emoji or not.
This function will be used further when
add_custom_emoji_policy will be extended
to include all COMMON_POLICY_VALUES.
This commit replaces boolean field add_emoji_by_admins_only with an
integer field add_custom_emoji_policy as we would also add full members
and moderators option for this setting in further commits.
This commit moves "enter_sends" setting to property_types dict.
With this change, changing enter_sends setting also sends an
event of type "update_display_settings" and thus enables us
to live-update the UI.
This field will control whether or not a user wants to sync their
drafts between different clients. Defaults to enabled.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
This makes several changes:
* Fixes a bug where the help text explaining our policies was not displayed.
* No help text was defined for many organization types.
* Copy-edits the help text somewhat.
* Offers all of the organization type options.
* Removes the 100% coverage requirement because it's annoying to test
the e.currentTarget click handler.
We are starting to run into situations where this data could be
quite useful for making future decisions, so it makes to store it
in the database, not just in an email.
Moving forward we are hoping to collect data on org types from our
users, so it makes sense to display the org type on the "Counts"
tab of our /activity page.
This commit adds moderators and full members options for
user_group_edit_policy by using COMMON_POLICY_TYPES.
Moderators do not require to be a member of user group in
order to edit or remove the user group if they are allowed
to do so according to user_group_edit_policy.
But full members need to be a member of user group to edit
or remove the user group.
This will be used to store the missedmessage events received
during the waiting time for email notifications (which is currently
2 minutes, hardcoded).
The change in `test_retention` is because we've set `on_delete=CASCADE`
for the message field this table.
The new query is like so:
```
DELETE FROM "zerver_missedmessageemailentry"
WHERE "zerver_missedmessageemailentry"."message_id" IN (
1545, 1546, 1547, 1548, 1549, 1550, 1551, 1552, 1553
)
```
This reduces loose strings in the codebase, and allows us to not worry
about the exact naming (`stream_email_enabled` or `stream_emails_enabled`?)
and tense (`mentioned` or `mention`?).
Ideally this new class should have been in `lib/notification_data.py`,
which is our file for things like this. But, the next commit requires
using this data in `models.py`, and importing from `notification_data.py`
to `models.py` causes recursive imports.
We add a new class UserBaseSettings and will be moving some of
the user settings to this class from UserProfile and UserProfile
will inherit it.
This is a prep commit for adding RealmUserDefault table which will
be used to set the realm-wide default for user settings like night
mode, etc. Adding UserBaseSettings will help us in avoiding copy
the same fields in RealmUserDefault.
We remove timezone setting from UserProfile.property_types
so that we can directly use UserProfile.property_types for
implementation of realm-default values of various user
settings.
This helper will be used to check whether
the user is allowed to edit user groups or
not. Currently it is not used, but will
be used in next commit where we will
refactor the user_group_edit_policy to use
COMMON_POLICY_TYPES.
This is a follow-up for 98f8d94b25.
For cases when url_format_string is like https://example.com/%%(foo)s/%(bar)s
group_match_regex should only detect `bar` as the intended
parameter and not `foo`.
We now validate the linkifier urls and patterns together, and add
the following additional checks:
1. All groups in the pattern must be used in the URL format string.
2. All groups in the URL format string must be declared in the pattern.
Linkifier pattern is now validated inside the `clean` method.
`filter_pattern_validator` is moved from `clean_fields` to `clean`
method as a safe check. As a result of this, a Puppeteer test case
is updated.
NOTE: The changes here are IN ADDITION to the existing validations.
Fixes#16482.
Co-authored-by: akshatdalton <akshat.dak@students.iiit.ac.in>
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Wesley Aptekar-Cassels
Sahil Batra
Shelly
Dinesh
Alex Vandiver
Eeshan Garg
Mateusz Mandera
Hemanth V. Alluri
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
sahil839
Vishnu KS
akshatdalton
Rohitt Vashishtha