This commit adds users to the appropriate system user group
based on their role. We also change the user groups when
changing role of the user.
We also add migration to add existing users to the appropriate
user groups.
This commit adds update_users_in_full_members_system_group which
is currently used to update the full members group on changing
role of a user. This function will be modified in next commit such
that it can be used to update full members group on changing
waiting_period_threshold setting of realm.
create_preregistration_user is a footgun, because it takes the realm
from the request. The calling code is supposed to validate that
registration for the realm is allowed
first, but can sometimes do that on "realm" taken from something else
than the request - and later on calls create_preregistration_user, thus
leading to prereg user creation on unvalidated request.realm.
It's safer, and makes more sense, for this function to take the intended
realm as argument, instead of taking the entire request. It follows that
the same should be done for prepare_activation_url.
In these tests, the code ends up with a logged in session when it's
undesired - later on these tests make requests to a different subdomain
- where a logged in session is not supposed to exist. This leads to an
unintended, strange situation where request.user is a user from the old
subdomain but the request itself is to a *different* subdomain. This
throws off get_realm_from_request, which will return the realm from
request.user.realm - which is not what these tests want and can lead to
these tests failing when some of the production code being tested
switches to using get_realm_from_request instead of
get_realm(get_subdomain).
The codepaths for joining an organization via a multi-use invitation
(accounts_home_from_multiuse_invite and maybe_send_to_registration)
weren't validating whether
the organization the invite was generated for matches the organization
the user attempts to join - potentially allowing an attacker with access
to organization A to generate a multi-use invite and use it to join
organization B within the same deployment, that they shouldn't have
access to.
The database value for expiry_date is None for the invite
that will never expire and the clients send -1 as value
in the API similar to the message retention setting.
Also, when passing invite_expire_in_days as an argument
in various functions, invite_expire_in_days is passed as
-1 for "Never expires" option since invite_expire_in_days
is an optional argument in some functions and thus we cannot
pass "None" value.
For aliases that will no longer be listed, see the third column of
grep '^L ' zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.*/site-packages/pytz/zoneinfo/tzdata.zi
Time zones previously set to an alias will be canonicalized on demand.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
While accepting an invitation from a user, there was no condition in
place to check if the user sending the invitation was now
now-deactivated.
Skip sending notifications about newly-joined users to users who are
now disabled.
Fixes#18569.
This commit sets us up for the next commit, which will
save us a very expensive query.
If you are adding 15k users to a stream, and each user
has about 20 existing streams, then we need to retrieve
300k rows from the database to figure out which stream
colors they already have. We don't need all the extra
fields from Subscription, so now we get just the two
values we need for making a color map.
In the next commit we'll eliminate the other use case
for the big query, and I will explain in greater
depth how splitting out the color-picking code can
be a huge win. It is possible that some product decisions
could make this codepath easier. We could also do some
engineering specific to stream colors, such as caching
which colors users have already used.
This does cost us an extra round trip to the database.
This replaces the TERMS_OF_SERVICE and PRIVACY_POLICY settings with
just a POLICIES_DIRECTORY setting, in order to support settings (like
Zulip Cloud) where there's more policies than just those two.
With minor changes by Eeshan Garg.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
The comment explains in more detail, but basically we'd skip
exercising a bit of code in the signup code path if there were no
messages in the last week, resulting in the query count not matching.
A confirmation link takes a user to the check_prereg_key_and_redirect
endpoint, before getting redirected to POST to /accounts/register/. The
problem was that validation was happening in the check_prereg_key_and_redirect
part and not in /accounts/register/ - meaning that one could submit an
expired confirmation key and be able to register.
We fix this by moving validation into /accouts/register/.
This commit updates the error message returned when the maximum
invite limit for the day. We update the error returned by API to
only mention that the limit is reached and add the suggestion
to use multi-use link or contact support in the message shown
in webapp.
This commit removes the existing default_twenty_four_hour_time field in
Realm table which was used to set the twenty_four_hour_time setting of
new user on joining and instead we now use the twenty_four_hour_time
field of RealmUserDefault table for the same.
With some tweaks by tabbott to clarify the documentation.
The test now uses submit_reg_form_for_user, meaning a blank
full_name is posted to /accounts/register/ rather than the
parameter being excluded.
Fixes part of #7564
I had to pass stop_after_reg_form=True, as the call to get_user in
verify_signup fails. I am not sure whether this is the expected
behavior. Also this causes the test to use submit_reg_form_for_user,
meaning a blank password is posted to /accounts/register/ rather than
no password.
Fixes part of #7564
get_user_by_delivery_email should be used, given that the email variable
is the realm email address that the account is being created with, not
the .email field which can be a dummy address based on org settings.
This extends the invite api endpoints to handle an extra
argument, expiration duration, which states the number of
days before the invitation link expires.
For prereg users, expiration info is attached to event
object to pass it to invite queue processor in order to
create and send confirmation link.
In case of multiuse invites, confirmation links are
created directly inside do_create_multiuse_invite_link(),
For filtering valid user invites, expiration info stored in
Confirmation object is used, which is accessed by a prereg
user using reverse generic relations.
Fixes#16359.
SOCIAL_AUTH_SUBDOMAIN was potentially very confusing when opened by a
user, as it had various Login/Signup buttons as if there was a realm on
it. Instead, we want to display a more informative page to the user
telling them they shouldn't even be there. If possible, we just redirect
them to the realm they most likely came from.
To make this possible, we have to exclude the subdomain from
ROOT_SUBDOMAIN_ALIASES - so that we can give it special behavior.
This commit modifies the copy_user_settings code such that instead
of source user profile, we can have two types of sources - a user
profile and RealmUserDefault table of realm and then set the
settings from RealmUserDefault only is there is no user profile
as a source.
We also rename copy_user_settings to copy_default_settings for
clarity.
We set the enable_marketing_emails setting after copying user
settings to override the value selected in registration form.
This change is also necessary because enable_marketing_emails
field is present in RealmUserDefault to avoid copying code
but we do not use this value actually and instead we want
the setting to be set according to the value in registration
form.
We set this setting only for non-bot users since we generally
do not set any settings for bots.
The commit:
1. Adds the new field as nullable.
2. Adds code that'll create new Confirmation with the field set
correctly.
3. For verifying validity of Confirmation object this still uses the old
logic in get_object_from_key() to keep things functioning until we
backfill the old objects in the next step.
Thus this commit is deployable. Next we'll have a commit to run a
backfill migration.
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
Sahil Batra
Mateusz Mandera
Eeshan Garg
parth
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Gilbert Bishop-White
shanukun
Mateusz Mandera
sahil839
Wesley Aptekar-Cassels