This guarantees that the Realm is always non-None when we hit the
codepath is_static_or_current_realm_url via
do_change_stream_description, so that we can properly skip rewritting
some images.
Fixes#19405
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Current value of can_remove_subscribers_group field is admins system group
only so behavior is not changed. We would provide support to change this
setting from API and UI in further commits.
This commit sets can_remove_subscribers_group to admins system
group while creating streams as it will be the default value
of this setting. In further we would provide an option to set
value of this setting to any user group while creating streams
using API or UI.
This commit extracts whether a stream is accessible or not
in a new function such that "Subscription" object is passed
by the caller and thus we can use these functions to check
access of multiple streams in a loop without querying the
database in a loop for subscription objects.
This commit renames admin_access_required parameter of
list_to_streams function to unsubscribing_others since that
parameter is used and passed as True only when calling
the function while unsubscribing others and in further
commits we would allow non-admins too to unsubscribe others
based on can_remove_subscribers_group setting.
This commit removes the is_stream_admin property of Subscription
model and also updates check_stream_access_for_delete_or_update
to not return true when is_stream_admin is True.
We also removes the relevant tests.
This change is done as we would not be moving forward with the
stream administrator concept as we have decided to modify the
permissions model as per #19525.
We have now decided to not continue with the stream administrator
concept as we are changing the permissions model to be based on
user groups as per #19525. So, this commit updates the error message
to "Must be an organization administrator".
Add none-checks, rename variables (to avoid redefinition of
the same variable with different types error), add necessary
type annotations.
This is a part of #18777.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <359101898@qq.com>
This commit changes the error message from "Invalid stream id"
to "Invalid stream ID" for cases where invalid stream IDs are
passed to API endpoints to make it consistent with other similar
error messages.
In English, compound adjectives should essentially always be
hyphenated. This makes them easier to parse, especially for users who
might not recognize that the words “web public” go together as a
phrase.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The change to curl_param_value_generators.py warrants a brief
explanation. Stream permission changes now generate a notification
message. Our curl example test for removing a reaction comes after
the two tests for updating the stream permission changes, thus the
hardcoded message ID in that test needs to be incremented by 2 to
account for the two notification messages that now come before it.
This is a part of #20289.
Users wanted a feature where they could specify
which users can create public streams and which users can
create private streams.
This splits stream creation code into two parts,
public and private stream creation.
Fixes#17009.
This is a somewhat subtle function, that deserves a few comments
explaining subtle details of its logic, and there's no good reason to
have multiple copies of that logic that are slightly inconsistent.
Because the main changes here are just checking for invariant
failures, the behavioral change here should be limited to ensuring
deactivated streams are not considered available even if they were
tagged as web public streams before deactivation.
User can now create web public stream via the /subscribe API.
So, when a web public stream present in the API request does not
exist, it will be created now by specifying the is_web_public
parameter. The parameter would have been ignored without this
commit.
The new error message is more clear about why, "User cannot create
stream with this settings." was bad English, and in any case removing
an unnecessary string is always an improvement for translators.
This adds a new class called MessageRenderingResult to contain the
additional properties we added to the Message object (like alert_words)
as well as the rendered content to ensure typesafe reference. No
behavioral change is made except changes in typing.
This is a preparatory change for adding django-stubs to the backend.
Related: #18777
The caller is supposed validate the stream and user realm match, but
since this is a security-sensitive function, we should have this
defensive code to protect against some validation bugs in the caller
leading to this being called incorrectly and returning True.
django.utils.translation.ugettext is a deprecated alias of
django.utils.translation.gettext as of Django 3.0, and will be removed
in Django 4.0.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A bug in the implementation of the can_forge_sender permission
(previously is_api_super_user) resulted in users with this permission
being able to send messages appearing as if sent by a system bots,
including to other organizations hosted by the same Zulip installation.
- The send message API had a bug allowing an api super user to
use forging to send messages to other realms' streams, as a
cross-realm bot. We fix this most directly by eliminating the
realm_str parameter - it is not necessary for any valid current use
case. The email gateway doesn't use this API despite the comment in
that block suggesting otherwise.
- The conditionals inside access_stream_for_send_message are changed up
to improve security. They were generally not ordered very well,
allowing the function to successfully return due to very weak
acceptance conditions - skipping the higher importance checks that
should lead to raising an error.
- The query count in test_subs is decreased because
access_stream_for_send_message returns earlier when doing its check
for a cross-realm bot sender - some subscription checking queries are
skipped.
- A linkifier test in test_message_dict needs to be changed. It didn't
make much sense in the first place, because it was creating a message
by a normal user, to a stream outside of the user's realm. That
shouldn't even be allowed.
We keep the error message same for all cases when a user is not
allowed to create streams for all values of create_stream_policy.
We raise error with different message for guest cases because it
is handled by decorators. We aim to change this behavior in future.
Explaining the details in error message isn't much important as
we do not show errors probably in API only, as we do not the show
the options itself in the frontend.
This commit adds a new option of STREAM_POST_POLICY_MODERATORS
in stream_post_policy which will allow only realm admins and
moderators to post in that stream.
We extract a helper which checks whether to allow the sender to send the
message to a stream according to the stream_post_policy. The purpose
of extracting it out is to avoid additional code for checking the access
for bot owners in case of bot sending the messages and instead calling
the handler two times - one time for sender and one time for bot owner if
sender is a bot.
This commit modifies the has_permission function to include
realm moderator role. Thus this adds a new option of moderators
only for create_stream_policy.
Though this automatically adds this option for invite_to_stream_policy
also, but we will keep other code for showing error and for tests
in a separate commit.
This commit changes the list_to_streams function to raise error
according to create_stream_policy value when a user cannot create
streams instead of same error for all cases.
This commit renames the is_new_member property in models.py
to is_provisional_member which will return true for any user
who is not a full member. We will add a condition in further
commit such that this returns 'False' for a moderator as we
will initially give all the rights to moderator that a full
member has.
We currently not allow new bots to send message in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS', but we should
allow them to send messages if their owner is a full member.
This will make it consistent with behavior in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_ADMINS_ONLY' where we allow non admin
bots with owner as admin to send messages.
According to tests we should not allow bot without owners to
post in streams with STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS.
But the code does not handle this and the related test passes
and raises error for case of bots without owner because the bot
is itself a new member.
This commit fixes this by adding a condition to check if there
is no bot owner and then raise error if there is no owner.
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
Sahil Batra
Zixuan James Li
Eeshan Garg
Alex Vandiver
Shlok Patel
Ganesh Pawar
Tim Abbott
Aman Agrawal
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Mateusz Mandera
sahil839
Steve Howell