`--jsx preserve` and `--removeComments false` are already the default.
`--strict` already implies `--noImplicitAny`, `--noImplicitThis`,
`--alwaysStrict`.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Commit d17b577d0c (#13321) incorrectly
transformed this line, even though I thought my script had a specific
guard against this.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Webpack code splitting will make the inclusion order of CSS files less
obvious, and we need to guarantee that these rules follow the rules
they override.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
ESLint won’t convert these automatically because it can’t rule out a
behavior difference arising from an access to a self-referential var
before it’s initialized:
> var x = (f => f())(() => x);
undefined
> let y = (f => f())(() => y);
Thrown:
ReferenceError: Cannot access 'y' before initialization
at repl:1:26
at repl:1:15
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Because of the separate declarations, ESLint would convert them to
`let` and then trigger the `prefer-const` error.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
This feels a bit more semantically appropriate: it more clearly says
"here's some information: there is no (relevant) recipient", rather
than "no information available". (Both `null` and `undefined` in JS
can have either meaning, but `undefined` especially commonly means
the latter.)
Concretely, it ensures a bit more explicitness where the value
originates: a bare `return;` becomes `return null;`, reflecting the
fact that it is returning a quite informative value.
Also make the implementation more explicit about what's expected here,
replacing truthiness tests with `!== null`. (A bit more idiomatic
would be `!= null`, which is equivalent when the value is well-typed
and a bit more robust to ill-typing bugs. But lint complains about
that version.)
It'd already been the case for some while that calling `stop` had the
same effect as calling `update` (previously `handle_text_input`) with
a falsy recipient. With the API changes in the previous few commits,
this becomes quite natural to make explicit in the API.
This was named after when it gets called from the UI, rather than
after what it can be expected to do.
Naming it after what it's meant to do -- and giving a summary line to
expand on that -- provides a more helpful semantic idea for reasoning
about the function. Doubly so for using the function in a different
client with its own UI, like the mobile app.
The main motivation for this change is to simplify this interface
and make it easier to reason about.
The case where it affects the behavior is when
is_valid_conversation() returns false, while current_recipient
and get_recipient() agree on some truthy value.
This means the message-content textarea is empty -- in fact the
user just cleared it, because we got here from an input event on
it -- but the compose box is still open to some PM thread that we
have a typing notification still outstanding for.
The old behavior is that in this situation we would ignore the
fact that the content was empty, and go ahead and prolong the
typing notification, by updating our timer and possibly sending a
"still typing" notice.
This contrasts with the behavior (both old and new) in the case
where the content is empty and we *don't* already have an
outstanding typing notification, or we have one to some other
thread. In that case, we cancel any existing notification and
don't start a new one, exactly as if `stop` were called
(e.g. because the user closed the compose box.)
The new behavior is that we always treat clearing the input as
"stopped typing": not only in those cases where we already did,
but also in the case where we still have the same recipients.
(Which seems like probably the common case.)
That seems like the preferable behavior; indeed it's hard to see
the point of the "compose_empty" logic if restricted to the other
cases. It also makes the interface simpler.
Those two properties don't seem like a coincidence, either: the
complicated interface made it difficult to unpack exactly what
logic we actually had, which made it easy for surprising wrinkles
to hang out indefinitely.
Returning true from this function means we go on to send, or extend
the lifetime of, a typing notification; returning false means we don't.
It's hard to see why having a partially-entered name in the recipient
box should mean we're *more* inclined to send a typing notification to
the set of recipients that are already entered; if anything, it seems
like it should make us *less* inclined to do so. So we're better off
without this conditional.
The conditional was introduced in commit 72295e94b, as part of a
conversion from user emails to user IDs; there, it seems to replace a
condition that went in the opposite direction, returning *false* if
there were any invalid emails in the recipient box. So perhaps it's
just inverted.
Moreover, the (re-)inverted version would also be wrong: if the user
is typing a PM addressed to some users, and they hit send, the message
will go to those users whether or not they have any unconverted text
in the recipients box. So the typing notifications should too.
The real purpose these two callbacks serve is exactly what an ordinary
parameter is perfect for:
* Each has just one call site, at the top of the function.
* They're not done for side effects; the point is what they return.
* The function doesn't pass them any arguments of its own, or
otherwise express any internal knowledge that doesn't just as
properly belong to its caller.
So, push the calls to these callbacks up into the function's caller,
and pass in the data they return instead.
This greatly simplifies the interface of `handle_text_input` and of
`typing_status` in general.
Users generally don't expect wildcard mentions in muted streams and
topics to be treated as a mention, either for the purposes of desktop
notifications or the unread mention counts.
This fixes the unread mention counts part of the issue.
Fixes part of #13073.
When email address visibility is set to everyone, there is no change in
behavior, but when it is set to "admins-only", we don't show any email
in user profile modal (just like popovers) for everyone but admins.
When email address visibility is set to everyone, there is no change in
behavior, but when it is set to "admins-only", we don't show any email
in popovers for everyone but admins.
This adds the general machinery required, and sets it up for the file
`typing_status.js` as a first use case.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
These indeed used to be strings, but were converted to arrays in
b8250fc61, and these names didn't get updated to match.
A classic example of why type-checking is a great job to get
machines to do. :-)
When a user performs a search that might contain historical public
streams messages that the user has access to (but doesn't because
we're searching the user's own personal history), we add a notice
above the first search result to let the user know that not all
messages may have been searched.
Fixes#12036.
When typing_status adds 10000 to this value, it would previously
obtain wacky strings like
"Fri Oct 04 2019 16:45:59 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)10000"
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The historical behavior of having `Enter` exit was optimized for the
"View source" use case; but `Esc` now handles that reasoanbly, and we
really should make it convenient to type in the user-editable text
box here.
Fixes part 1 of #11834.
This ensures that typing '```java' and pressing enter would result in
getting dropped into a java codeblock instead of javascript codeblock.
We implement this by pushing the exact match of a query to be pushed to
the top of the returned matches in `sort_languages`.
With some comments added by tabbott in the tests explaining the
current reasoning.
Fixes#13109.
Apparently, the changes in fe2adeeee1 to
fix a Firefox focus bug accidentally had the side effect of removing
the topic text box from the area being considered, resulting in the
escape key no longer working to end the message edit from within that
text box.
This is a simple and small commit which will alphabetically order the
entries of the fixtures dropdown menu in the "integrations developer
panel" devtool.
Apparently, the Zulip notifications (and resulting emails) were
correct, but the download links inside the Zulip UI were incorrectly
not including S3 prefix on the URL, making them not work.
While we're at this, we rewrite the somewhat convoluted previous
system for formatting the data export output.
Bootstrap v2.2.0^2~40^2~6 changes this default to false, so this is a
prerequisite to upgrading Bootstrap, and it’s also safer.
This closes an HTML injection path via user full names in the emoji
reaction tooltip. It doesn’t appear to be exploitable for cross-site
scripting because we disallow `>` in full names, and the code happens
to be written such that the next `>` is in a different parser
invocation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
In a gigantic realm where we send several MB of `page_params`, it’s
slightly better to have the rest of the `<body>` available to the
browser earlier, so it can show the “Loading…” spinner and start
fetching subresources.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Precompiling regexes gives a performance increase of around 10-15%
based on tests. See https://jsperf.com/typeahead-regex. This stacks
up when we have a lot of users in an organisation.
This changes the availability icon for bot users to user_circle_green;
previously it was accidentally defaulting to user_circle_empty, making
it appear that bots were never available.
Fixes#13149.
As it turns out, our rerender_the_whole_thing function (used whenever
we were adding messages and discovered that the resulting message list
would be out-of-order) was just broken and scrolled the browser to a
random location.
This caused two user-facing bugs:
* On very fast networks, if two users sent messages at very close to
the same time, we could end up with out-of-order message deliveries,
triggering this code path, which was intended to silently correct
the situation, but failed.
* In some narrows to streams with muted topics in the history but some
recent traffic, the user's browser-cached history might have some
gaps that mean the server fetch we do after narrowing discovers the
history is out-of-order, again triggering the
rerender_the_whole_thing code path.
The fix is to just remove that function, adding a new option to the
well-tested rerender_preserving_scrolltop (which has explicit logic to
preserve the scroll position) instead.
Fixes#12067. Likely also fixes#12498.
This sidesteps tricky escaping issues, and will make it easier to
build a strict Content-Security-Policy.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This sidesteps tricky escaping issues, and will make it easier to
build a strict Content-Security-Policy.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This brings us in line, and also allows us to style these more like
unordered lists, which is visually more appealing.
On the backend, we now use the default list blockprocessor + sane list
extension of python-markdown to get proper list markup; on the
frontend, we mostly return to upstream's code as they have followed
CommonMark on this issue.
Using <ol> here necessarily removes the behaviour of not renumbering
on lists written like 3, 4, 7; hopefully users will be OK with the
change.
Fixes#12822.
Anders Kaseorg
Greg Price
Rohitt Vashishtha
Vishnu KS
Pragati Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Vinit Singh
YashRE42
bartek
Hemanth V. Alluri
clarammdantas
Thomas Ip