When we populate the buddy list or update it for activity, we now
have buddy_data set a faded flag that is rendered in the template.
This avoids some re-rendering overhead and is on the eventual path
to having our widget be more data-oriented (and all rendering happens
"behind" the widget).
We still do direct DOM updates when the compose state changes or
when we get peer subscription events.
This introduces a generic class called list_cursor to handle the
main details of navigating the buddy list and wires it into
activity.js. It replaces some fairly complicated code that
was coupled to stream_list and used lots of jQuery.
The new code interacts with the buddy_list API instead of jQuery
directly. It also persists the key across redraws, so we don't
lose our place when a focus ping happens or we type more characters.
Note that we no longer cycle to the top when we hit the bottom, or
vice versa. Cycling can be kind of an anti-feature when you want to
just lay on the arrow keys until they hit the end.
The changes to stream_list.js here do not affect the left sidebar;
they only remove code that was used for the right sidebar.
The blur_search() function was removed in this commit:
See da06832837
We now no longer attempt to call it. It's not completely clear
to me what this did before, but we are rewriting a lot of the
keyboard navigation for search anyway.
In this cleanup I make it so that all jQuery selector references
are toward the top of the module, and we do all finds relative
to the container ('#user_presences').
This will make it easier to make a better list abstraction for
the buddy list, for things like progressive rendering.
This was a bit more than moving code. I extracted the
following things:
$widget (and three helper methods)
$input
text()
empty()
expand_column
close_widget
activity.clear_highlight
There was a minor bug before this commit, where we were inconsistent
about trimming spaces. The introduction of text() and empty() should
prevent bugs where users type the space bar into search.
A recent change filtered out offline users from the buddy list
whenever the list size would otherwise exceed 600.
This commit reverts half that change--we can now show 600+ users
again, but only when searching.
This is because we cover the case of `realm_allow_message_editing` by
`realm_msg_edit_limit_setting` after the conversion into dropdown.
This commit also contains a minor variable renaming.
Add realm setting to set time limit for message deleitng.
Set default value of message_content_delete_limit_seconds
to 600 seconds(10 min).
Thanks to Shubham Dhama for rebasing and reworking this. Some final
edits also done by Tim Abbott.
Fixes#7344.
This fixes an issue where with very tall messages (more than about a
screen in height), one would end up scrolled to the bottom of the
message if you clicked on it, which usually felt annoying.
Fixes#8941.
Previously, we did a rerender without first re-computing which
messages were muted; this was incorrect, because whether a message is
muted can change if the topic changes.
Fixes#9241.
This was only called from two places in one function, and we can just
check muting_enabled in the caller.
This refactor is important, because we might need to update muting
after other changes (specifically, message editing to move a topic to
be muted/non-muted).
This is a slight change in the responsive design, moving the 975px
cutoff to 1025px; the main effect is that for windows that just barely
had a right sidebar, we now hide the ride sidebar. This is pretty
beneficial for the user experience specifically in the common size of
1024px, where that sidebar was making things feel a bit too
constrained.
This function replaces part of compose_fade.would_receive_message(),
which has a real janky interface of returning true, false, or
undefined.
We don't need to couple the semantics of compose fading to whether
we help subscribe a mentioned user. They're mostly similar, but they
will probably diverge for things like bots, and the coupling makes
it difficult to do email -> user_id conversions.
One thing that changes here is that we get the stream name from
compose_state, instead of compose_fade.focused_recipient. The
compose_fade code uses focused_recipient for kind of complicated
reasons that don't concern us here.
This coverts the "checkbox" for `realm_allow_message_editing` and
"input" for `realm_message_content_edit_limit_seconds` into a
dropdown with the option for custom time limit option.
If the browser is in the progress of reloading when it finishes
fetching some messages, it's not really a bug, and we shouldn't report
it as such.
This should help make Zulip's browser error reporting less spammy.
If you visit a narrow that has unread messages on it that aren't part
of the home view (e.g. in a muted stream), then we were never calling
`message_util.do_unread_count_updates`, and more importantly,
`unread.process_loaded_messages` on those messages. As a result, they
would be unread, and moving the cursor over them would never mark
those messages as read (which was visible through the little green
marker never disappearing).
I can't tell whether this fixes#8042 and/or #8236; neither of them
exactly fits the description of this issue unless the PM threads in
question were muted or something, but this does feel related.
We consistently either pass a `then_select_id` into narrow.activate,
or were using the select_first_unread option. Now, we just compute
select_first_unread based on the value of then_select_id.
In the very early days of Zulip, we didn't have unread counts; just
the pointer, and the correct behavior when opening a new tab was to
place you near the pointer. That doesn't make any sense now that we
do have unread counts, and this corner case has been a wart for a long
time.
This commit does the main behavior change here. However, there's a
bug we need to fix, where we might end up trying to pre-render a view
of the narrow based on the `all_msg_list` data before `all_msg_list`
is caught up). We need to fix that bug before we can merge this; it
should be possible to determine that using `FetchStatus` on
`all_msg_list`, or with better performance by using the `unread_msgs`
structure to determine whether the message we should be selecting is
present locally.
Fixes#789.
Fixes#9070.
Apparently, we were incorrectly passing through something related to
opts.use_initial_narrow_pointer as the value for `use_first_anchor`.
If you read the logic in narrow.js carefully,
use_initial_narrow_pointer was unconditionally false.
The correct value for this attribute is when we're trying to narrow to
the first unread message in a given context. There are two things to
check:
* then_select_id is -1; i.e. we don't have a specific message ID we're
trying to narrow around.
* select_first_unread is True, i.e. we're trying to narrow to the
first unread message.
A bit more work should allow us to get rid of the second condition,
but I'm not quite confident enough to do that yet.
This prevents us from using const in our JS code, with exceptions
for test code and the portico. Hopefully this is just a temporary
rule until we make our pipelines with work with ES6.
I tried to prevent "let", but that was too noisy.
This adjusts the one false-negative case of using const in a comment.
This change makes a common code path for these two operations:
* clicking on a user
* hitting enter when a user is highlighted
The newer codepath, for the enter key, had some differences that
were just confusing. For example, there's no need to open the
compose box, since that's already handled by the narrowing code.
For possibly dubious reasons, I let each handler still call
popovers.hide_all() on its own, since it makes the code a bit
more consistent with existing code patterns.
If we would have more than 600 people in a buddy list, it's kind of
cumbersome to scroll through it, and it's also expensive to render
it (short of doing progressive rendering, which adds a lot of
complexity).
So, as a short term measure, we filter out offline users whenever the
list would exceed 600 users. Note that if you are doing a search that
narrows to fewer 600 users, the offline users will appear again.
We now have components.toggle simply return an object, without
putting the object into a lookup table. The consumers of the
objects have all been changed to just store the object in their
own module scope.
The diff is a bit hard to read here, but it's mostly de-denting
code and removing these things:
- we don't have opts.name
- we don't have __toggle.lookup
- we don't have keys
- we don't create a sibling object to the prototype object
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Shubham Dhama
YJDave
Akash Nimare
Vishnu Ks
Umair Khan
Sampriti Panda
Utkarsh Patil