The term "username" confusingly refers both to the Django concept of
"username" (meaning "the name the user types into the login form") and
a concept the admin presumably already has in their existing
environment; which may or may not be the same thing, and in fact this
is where we document the admin's choice of whether and how they should
correspond. The Django concept in particular isn't obvious, and is
counterintuitive when it means something like an email address.
Explicitly explain the Django "username" concept, under the name of
"Zulip username" to take responsibility for our choice of how it's
exposed in the settings interface. Then use an explicit qualifier,
like "LDAP username", whenever referring to some other notion of
username. And make a pass over this whole side of the instructions,
in particular for consistent handling of these concepts.
Expand on a few things that tend to confuse people (especially the
`%(user)s` thing); move the `LDAPSearchUnion` example out to docs;
adjust the instructions to fit a bit better in their new docs/ home.
This makes it easier to iterate on these, and to expand supplemental
information (like troubleshooting, or unusual configurations) without
further straining the already-dauntingly-long settings.py.
It also makes it easier to consult the instructions while editing the
secrets file, or testing things, etc. -- most admins will find it more
natural to keep a browser open somewhere than a second terminal.
Previously, if someone updated his/her name from accounts page and closed
the modal and then reopen the modal, the page still had the old name as
we use `page_params.full_name` in `accounts-settings.handlebars`. This
commit fixes this bug.
Fixes: #10529.
The companion tool `tools/reset-to-pull-request` has a handy feature
to maintain a local ref tracking the PR: e.g., pr/1234 for PR 1234.
If this were a normal remote-tracking branch maintained by `git fetch`,
it'd get updated on `git push`. Do the same thing here.
This helps keep a view like `gitk --all @` a bit tidier, by causing
merged PRs to stop pointing at side branches of the main history.
Since now we have email notifications for streams messages too, so
there is no direct dependency of
`message_content_in_email_notifications`checkbox on
`enable_offline_email_notifications` setting and neither we can say it's
dependent on `enable_stream_email_notifications` as well because we may
have email notifications set for individual streams. So removing this
checkbox dependency is the best solution here.
Fixes the urgent part of #10397.
It was discovered that soft-deactivated users don't get mobile push
notifications for messages on private streams that they have configured
to send push notifications.
Reason: `handle_push_notification` calls `access_message`, and that
logic assumes that a user who is a recipient of a message has an
associated UserMessage row. Those UserMessage rows are created
lazily for soft-deactivated users, so they might not exist (yet)
until the user comes back.
Solution: Ensure that userMessage row is created for
stream_push_user_ids and stream_email_user_ids in create_user_messages.
At some point as part of the process of supporting renumbering data,
we changed the structure of our file uploads to expect `path` to match
`s3_path`, with both having the relative path within the overall
hierarchy (including the realm ID). This change updates the more
rarely-used S3 export code path to use that model, fixing a crash when
messages reference an Attachment object with a rewritten path_id.
If any user had sent the reply to the welcome bot recommended by our
tutorial, then the Zulip export/import process didn't work properly,
because we weren't including (and then remapping) the recipient ID for
sending PMs to the cross-realm bots. This commit fixes that gap, by
recording the necessary data on the export side, and doing the
appropriate remapping on the import side.
Previously, our realm import logic only did the special remapping
logic for the original notifications_stream_id; when we added the new
signup_notifications_stream_id field, we neglected to handle it in the
same way.
I used line-height: 22px and font-size: 16px in .message-content to take the
screenshots. Requires some additional fiddling for the LaTeX picture, inline
code block, and maybe a few others.