This commit updates the db transaction to be durable for
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed to avoid
addition of any outer atomic block.
While adding any outer atomic block this will raise a runtime error
and we can replace the durable argument with 'savepoint=False'
otherwise we'll have to manually track down the action functions
getting called in that outer atomic block and set the savepoint=False
otherwise it'll lead to creation of savepoints which we don't want.
We can't set savepoint=False before hand to the outermost action
function because it leads to rollback of transaction in tests when
an error is raised in action function.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in
check_remove_custom_profile_field_value which can lead to a
situation where we enqueue events but the function fails at a
later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' in
'notify_realm_custom_profile_fields' which can lead to a situation,
if any db operation is added after the 'send_event' in the action
functions using it, where we enqueue event but the action function
fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
Fixes part of #30489.
This commit adds code to make sure that update events for changing
a user's role, email, etc. are not sent to guests who cannot access
the modified user.
This guarantees that the Realm is always non-None when we hit the
codepath is_static_or_current_realm_url via
do_change_stream_description, so that we can properly skip rewritting
some images.
Fixes#19405
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
To allow `custom_profile_field` to display in user profile popover,
added new boolean field "display_in_profile_summary" in its model class.
In `custom_profile_fields.py`, functions are edited as per conditions,
like currently we can display max 2 `custom_profile_fields` except
`LONG_TEXT` and `USER` type fields.
Default external account custom profile fields made updatable for only
this new field, as previous they were not updatable.
Fixes part of: #21215
To explain the rationale of this change, for example, there is
`get_user_activity_summary` which accepts either a `Collection[UserActivity]`,
where `QuerySet[T]` is not strictly `Sequence[T]` because its slicing behavior
is different from the `Protocol`, making `Collection` necessary.
Similarily, we should have `Iterable[T]` instead of `List[T]` so that
`QuerySet[T]` will also be an acceptable subtype, or `Sequence[T]` when we
also expect it to be indexed.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Prakhar Pratyush
Anders Kaseorg
Shubham Padia
Vector73
Sahil Batra
Zixuan James Li
yogesh sirsat