For fixed-price plans, we send a reminder email to
sales@zulip.com, 2 months before the end date, to review
the pricing and configure a new fixed-price plan accordingly.
Earlier, we were not configuring the end_date while creating
a fixed-price plan which would result in the automatic renewal
of the plan at the end of billing cycle.
Our plan is to re-evaluate the pricing when we are close to the
end date, then:
1. Schedule a new fixed-price plan with the updated or same price.
2. or Don't do anything - the plan will end on the end_date.
Now, we add an end_date of 1 year from the start date when
creating a fixed-price plan.
This is a prep commit which extracts the write_to_audit_log
code block in `update_end_date_of_current_plan` into a
function named 'write_to_audit_log_plan_property_changed'.
This would be helpful to avoid repetition as we plan to
include another such block when the plan's property
reminder_to_review_plan_email_sent is changed.
Updates the class name used for the sponsorship form container in
the remote support views to be more specific.
Adds a shared "support-form" class for the different forms in the
realm_details template.
Use the same CSS rule for current and next plan information sections.
This commit renames the realm-level setting
'signup_notifications_stream' to 'signup_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
This commit renames the realm-level setting 'notifications_stream'
to 'new_stream_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
5c96f94206 mistakenly appended, rather than prepended, the edit to
the history. This caused AssertionErrors when attempting to view the
history of moved messages, which check that the `last_edit_time`
matches the timestamp of the first edit in the list.
Fix the ordering, and update the `edit_history` for messages that were
affected. We limit to only messages edited since the commit was
merged, since that helps bound the affected messages somewhat.
The logic in the case where there's only one realm and the function
tries to migrate the server's plan to it, had two main unhandled edge
cases that would throw exceptions:
1.
```
remote_realm = RemoteRealm.objects.get(
uuid=realm_uuids[0], plan_type=RemoteRealm.PLAN_TYPE_SELF_MANAGED
)
```
This could throw an exception if the RemoteRealm exists, but has an
active e.g. Legacy plan. Then there'd be no object matching the
plan_type in the query, raising RemoteRealm.DoesNotExist.
2. If the RemoteRealm had e.g. a Legacy plan in the past, that's now
expired, then it'd have a Customer object. Meaning that the attempt
to move the server's customer to the realm:
`server_plan.customer = remote_realm_customer`
would trigger an IntegrityError since a RemoteRealm can't have two
Customer objects.
In simple cases the situation in (2) can still be easily migrated, by
moving the plan from the server's customer to the realm's customer.
This is kind of too specific, allowing testing for only one single error
when accessing signed_auth_url. Instead, this should use a general
pattern, which will allow other tests to use this to assert other kinds
of error responses that may be returned.
It doesn't make sense to run a loop over "all" query results, when those
results are just two, and each of them has its own distinct asserts.
That for loop is there probably due to copying the structure of the
earlier test_transfer_legacy_plan_from_server_to_all_realms test, for
which the loop does make sense.
- Makes "Deployment options" easier to navigate by splitting the
"Reverse proxies" and "System configuration" sections out into
dedicated pages.
Fixes#28928.
Now whenever we initiate sending a message, we save / update its draft,
which is deleted on a successful send. Earlier, we did this only for
locally echoed messages. Hence a non locally echoed message's draft
would remain, if created in the timeframe between initiating send and
receiving the same message from the server, which can be significant
for slow connections.
In 'invoice_plan()', the primary way to not create
an invoice for a plan is to not have any new ledger entry.
This commit adds a 'self.on_paid_plan()' check which is
an extra layer of defense to avoid creating any invoices
for customers not on paid plan. It saves a DB query too.
Just like deactivated realms should be excluded, so should locally
deleted realms.
In particular, failure to exclude locally deleted realms breaks
handle_customer_migration_from_server_to_realms.
Happily, every last CSS property in these styles is already
described for the places <pre> appears in the Zulip UI:
1. In rendered message markdown
2. In the compose preview
3. In the information overlay (Message formatting)